Advertisement

A Case Study of the Design and Evaluation of a Persuasive Healthy Lifestyle Assistance Technology: Challenges and Design Guidelines

  • Jie Xu
  • Ping-yu Chen
  • Scott Uglow
  • Alison Scott
  • Enid Montague
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6768)

Abstract

Technology can be used as an intervention of unhealthy lifestyles, but designing such a technology is challenging – usability as well as the ability of changing the user’s behavior needs to be considered. The design and evaluation process of a future generation persuasive healthy lifestyle assistance technology which involves physiology, environment monitoring, and automation was studied in this paper.Several challenges were identified and design guidelines were developed for designing such a technology which is used as an intervention of the user’s unhealthy lifestyle.

Keywords

persuasive technology case study lifestyle 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Marcus, A., Jean, J.: Going Green at Home: The Green Machine. Information Design Journal 17, 235–245 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kroeze, W., Werkman, A., Brug, J.: A systematic review of randomized trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored education on physical activity and dietary behaviors. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 31, 205–223 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chatterjee, S., Price, A.: Healthy living with persuasive technologies: Framework, Issues, and Challenges. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 16, 171 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Holtzblatt, K., Jones, S.: Contextual Inquiry: A Participatory Technique for System Design. In: Schuler, D., Namioka, A. (eds.) Participatory Design: Principles and Practices, pp. 177–210. Lawrence Erlbaum, N.J. (1993)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Van der Lelie, C.: The value of storyboards in the product design process. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 10, 159–162 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Snyder, C.: Paper prototyping. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wright, P., Monk, A.: The use of think-aloud evaluation methods in design. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 23, 55–57 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bardram, J., Bossen, C., Lykke-Olesen, A., Nielsen, R., Madsen, K.H.: Virtual video prototyping of pervasive healthcare systems. In: Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, pp. 167–177. ACM, London (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grudin, J.: Why CSCW applications fail: problems in the design and evaluationof organizational interfaces. In: Conference Why CSCW Applications Fail: Problems in the Design and Evaluationof Organizational Interfaces, pp. 85–93. ACM, New York (1988)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lazzaro, N.: Why We Play: Affect and the Fun of Games: Designing Emotions for Games, Entertainment Interface and Interactive Products. In: Sears, A., Jacko, J.A. (eds.) The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook, pp. 679–700. Lawrence Erlbaum, N.Y. (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Baranowski, T., Buday, R., Thompson, D., Baranowski, J.: Playing for real: video games and stories for health-related behavior change. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 34, 74 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Krukowski, R., Harvey-Berino, J., Kolodinsky, J., Narsana, R., DeSisto, T.: Consumers not use or understand calorie labeling in restaurants. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 106, 917–920 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moallem, A.: Excellence in ease of use with rich functionality how enterprise software applications with rich functionality can be built to excel in ease of use. In: Conference Excellence in ease of use with rich functionality how enterprise software applications with rich functionality can be built to excel in ease of use, pp. 672–681. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reeves, M., Rafferty, A.: Healthy lifestyle characteristics among adults in the United States, 2000. Archives of Internal Medicine 165, 854 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jie Xu
    • 1
  • Ping-yu Chen
    • 1
  • Scott Uglow
    • 1
  • Alison Scott
    • 1
  • Enid Montague
    • 1
  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering BuildingUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations