Developing Protégé to Structure Medical Report

  • Josette Jones
  • Kanitha Phalakornkule
  • Tia Fitzpatrick
  • Sudha Iyer
  • C. Zorina Ombac
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6768)

Abstract

The paper presents a creation of an Ontological framework for the capture, integration and presentation of clinical information embedded in medical reports. The project used a hybrid method of top-down and bottom-up method started by abstracting the concept healthcare event resulting in reusable knowledge structure. The tools employed in the project are Protégé 3.4, add-ins, and MySQL, which were used to structure annotated radiology reports with the focus on the reports pertaining to the heart. Furthermore, the project demonstrated how the relational database was developed from an existing ontology and how its database schema was imported to the ontology framework through Protégé’s DataMaster Plug-in. Then, we presented how to query the knowledge taxonomy in Protégé.

Keywords

Relational Database Resource Description Framework Description Logic Database Schema Unify Medical Language System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ammon, D., Hoffmann, D., Jakob, T., Finkeissen, E.: Developing an architecture of a knowledge-based electronic patient record. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 653–660. ACM, Leipzig (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Astrova, I.: Rules for Mapping SQL Relational Databases to OWL Ontologies (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Astrova, I., Korda, N., Kalja, A.: Storing OWL Ontologies in SQL Relational Databases. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 29 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cuenca Grau, B., Horrocks, I., Motik, B., Parsia, B., Patel-Schneider, P., Sattler, U.: OWL 2: The next step for OWL. Journal of Web Semantics 6(4), 309–322 (2008), doi:10.1016/j.websem.2008.05.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davis, R., Shrobe, H., Szolovits, P.: What is Knowledge Representation? AI Magazine 1993, 17–33 (1993)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Embley, D.W., Olivé, A., Ram, S.: Conceputal modeling. In: ER 2006: Proc. of the 25th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling, Tucson, AZ, USA, November 6-9 (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Friedlin, J., Jones, J., Mahoui, M., Jamieson, P.: Semantic Equivalence and Natural Language Processing of Biomedical Text. JAMIA under reviewGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grimm, S., Hitzler, P., Abecker, A.: Knowledge Representation and OntologiesGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gruber, T.: Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. In: Guarino, N., Poli, R. (eds.) Formal Ontology in Conceptual Analysis and Knowledge Representation, Substantial revision ed. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1993)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Boley, H., Tabet, S., Grosof, B., Deab, M.: SWRL: A Semantic Web Rule Language Combining OWL and RuleML. W3C, May 21 (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jovic, A.: Ontologies in Medical Knowledge RepresentationGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mao, Y., Wu, Z., Tian, W., Jiang, X., Cheung, W.: Dynamic sub-ontology evolution for traditional Chinese medicine web ontology. Journal of Biomedical Informatics (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Minsky, M.: A framework for representing knowledge. Psychology of Computer VisionGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mostowfi, F., Fotouhi, F.: Improving Quality of Ontology: An Ontology Transformation Approach (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nyulas, C., O’Connor, M., Tu, S.: Datamaster-a plug-in for importing schemas and data from relational databases in protégé (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    O’Connor, M.J., Shankar, R., Nyulas, C., Tu, S., Das, A.: Developing a Web-Based Application using OWL and SWRL. Stanford Medical InformaticsGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    O’Connor, M.J., Das, A.K.: A lightweight Model for representing and reasoning with temporal information in Biomedical Ontologies (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    O’Connor, M., Knaublauch, H., Tu, S., Musen, M.: Writing Rules for the Semantic Web Using SWRL and Jess. Stanford Medical Informatics (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Obrst, L., Ceusters, W., Mani, I., Ray, S., Smith, B.: The Evaluation of Ontologies. Semantic Web, 139–158 (2007)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Racer Systems GmbH & Co. KG. RacerPro User’s Guide Version 1.9.2 (October 2007), http://www.racer-systems.com
  21. 21.
    Rothwell, D.J., Cote, R.A., Cordeau, J.P., Boisvert, M.A.: Developing a Standard Data Structure for Medical Language - The SNOMED Proposal. AMIA, 695–699 (1994)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sane, S., Shirke, A.: Generating OWL Ontologies from a Relational Databases for the Semantic Web. In: International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication and Control (ICAC3 2009) (2009)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schulz, S., Stenzorn, H., Boeker, M., Smith, B.: Strengths and Limitations of Formal Ontologies in the Biomedical Domain. RECIIS Rev. Electron. Comun. Inf. Inov. Saude, 1–27 (2009)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stevens, R.: Ontology Based Document Enrichment in Bioinformatics. Comparative and Functional Genomics 3, 42–46 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sure, Y., Staab, S., Studer, R.: Methodology for Development and Employment of Ontology Based Knowledge Management Applications. SIGMOD Record 31(4), 18–23 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Uschold, M., et al.: The Enterprise Ontology. The Knowledge Engineering Review 13, 1–18 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    W3C, Resource Description Framework (RDF), World-Wide Web Consortium (2000), http://www.w3.org/RDF/
  28. 28.
    Zhang, S., Bodenreider, O.: Experience in Aligning Anatomical Ontologies. SInt J. Semant. Web Inf. Syst. 3(2), 1–26 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Josette Jones
    • 1
  • Kanitha Phalakornkule
    • 1
  • Tia Fitzpatrick
    • 1
  • Sudha Iyer
    • 1
  • C. Zorina Ombac
    • 1
  1. 1.School of InformaticsIndiana University-Purdue University IndianapolisIndianapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations