Introducing Animatronics to HCI: Extending Reality-Based Interaction

  • G. Michael Poor
  • Robert J. K. Jacob
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6762)


As both software and hardware technologies have been improved during the past two decades, a number of interfaces have been developed by HCI researchers. As these researchers began to explore the next generation of interaction styles, it was inevitable that they use a lifelike robot (or animatronic) as the basis for interaction. However, the main use up to this point for animatronic technology had been “edutainment.” Only recently was animatronic technology even considered for use as an interaction style. In this research, various interaction styles (conventional GUI, AR, 3D graphics, and introducing an animatronic user interface) were used to instruct users on a 3D construction task which was constant across the various styles. From this experiment the placement, if any, of animatronic technology in the realitybased interaction framework will become more apparent.


Usability Animatronics Lifelike Robotics Reality-Based Interaction Interaction Styles 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Jacob, R.J., Girouard, A., Hirsheld, L.M., Horn, M.S., Shaer, O., Solovey, E.T., Zigelbaum, J.: Reality-based interaction: A framework for post-WIMP interfaces. In: CHI 2008: Proceeding of the Twenty-sixth Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 201–210. ACM, New York (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    van Dam, A.: Post-WIMP user interfaces. Communications of the ACM 40, 63–67 (1997)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ishii, H., Ullmer, B.: Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. In: CHI 1997: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 234–241. ACM, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schilit, B., Adams, N., Want, R.: Context-aware computing applications. In: Proceedings of Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, pp. 85–90 (1994)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boud, A.C., Baber, C., Steiner, S.J.: Virtual reality: A tool for assembly? Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 9, 486–496 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Iqbal, R., Sturm, J., Kulyk, O., Wang, J., Terken, J.: User-centred design and evaluation of ubiquitous services. In: SIGDOC 2005: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference on Design of Communication, pp. 138–145. ACM, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tang, A., Owen, C., Biocca, F., Mou, W.: Comparative effectiveness of augmented reality in object assembly. In: CHI 2003: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 73–80. ACM, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Norman, D.A., Draper, S.W.: User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah (1986)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Christou, G.: A Knowledge-Based Framework for the Description and Evaluation of Reality-Based Interaction, Ph.D. thesis, Tufts University (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Logan, G.: Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review 95, 492–527 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Coradeschi, S., Ishiguro, H., Asada, M., Shapiro, S., Thielscher, M., Breazeal, C., Mataric, M., Ishida, H.: Human-inspired robots. IEEE Intelligent Systems 21, 74–85 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lockerd, A., Breazeal, C.: Tutelage and socially guided robot learning. In: Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS 2004, vol. 4 (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hoffman, G., Breazeal, C.: Effects of anticipatory action on human-robot teamwork effciency, fluency, and perception of team. In: Proceedings of 24 the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction, pp. 1–8. ACM, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Michael Poor
    • 1
  • Robert J. K. Jacob
    • 2
  1. 1.Computer ScienceBowling Green State UniversityBowling GreenUSA
  2. 2.Computer ScienceTufts UniversityMedfordUSA

Personalised recommendations