Advertisement

Voice-Leading Prototypes and Harmonic Function in Two Chorale Corpora

  • Ian Quinn
  • Panayotis Mavromatis
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6726)

Abstract

We describe a data representation for voice leading between two sonorities in a chorale texture, and a similarity measure for these voice leadings. These tools are used in an empirical study of the relationship between voice leading and harmonic function in a corpus of Bach chorales and a corpus of Lutheran chorales from a hundred years earlier. Common voice-leading types in the corpora are subjected to a cluster analysis that is readily interpreted in terms of harmonic functional syntax. We are thus able not only to read a theory of harmony directly out of a corpus, but to do so without building in a priori notions of chord structure, rootedness, or even key. The cluster analysis also clarifies important syntactic differences between the pre-tonal (modal) corpus and the Bach (tonal) corpus.

Keywords

Corpus Analysis Voice Leading Tonality Modality Harmonic Function Clustering 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Rameau, J.-P.: Traité de l’harmonie réduite à ses principes naturels, Paris (1722)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tymoczko, D.: Progressions fondamentales, functions, degrés, une grammaire de l’harmonie tonale élémentaire. Musurgia 10, 35–64 (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rohrmeier, M., Cross, I.: Statistical Properties of Tonal Harmony in Bach’s Chorales. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition, pp. 619–627. ICMPC, Sapporo (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Conklin, D.: Representation and Discovery of Vertical Patterns in Music. In: Anagnostopoulou, C., Ferrand, M., Smaill, A. (eds.) ICMAI 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2445, pp. 32–42. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Quinn, I.: Are Pitch-Class Profiles Really Key for Key? Zeitschrift der Gesellschaft der Musiktheorie 7, 151–163 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Osiander, L.: Fünfftzig Geistliche Lieder und Psalmen, Nürnberg (1586)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Praetorius, H., et al.: Melodeyen Gesangbuch, Hamburg (1604)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hassler, H.L.: Kirchengesäng, Nürnberg (1608)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schein, J.: Cantional oder Gesangbuch Augspurgischer Confession, Leipzig (1627)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bach, J.S., Riemenschneider, A. (eds.): 371 Harmonized Chorales and 69 Chorale Melodies with Figured Bass. Schirmer, New York (1941)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Forte, A.: The Structure of Atonal Music. Yale University Press, New Haven (1973)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zipf, G.K.: The Psycho-biology of Language. Houghton-Mifflin, Boston (1935)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Meeùs, N.: Toward a Post-Schoenbergian Grammar of Tonal and Pre-tonal Harmonic Progressions. Music Theory Online 6(1) (2000)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Agmon, E.: Functional Harmony Revisited: A Prototype-Theoretic Approach. Music Theory Spectrum 17, 196–214 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ian Quinn
    • 1
  • Panayotis Mavromatis
    • 2
  1. 1.Yale UniversityUSA
  2. 2.New York UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations