Skip to main content

Efficient CNF Simplification Based on Binary Implication Graphs

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 6695))

Abstract

This paper develops techniques for efficiently detecting redundancies in CNF formulas. We introduce the concept of hidden literals, resulting in the novel technique of hidden literal elimination. We develop a practical simplification algorithm that enables “Unhiding” various redundancies in a unified framework. Based on time stamping literals in the binary implication graph, the algorithm applies various binary clause based simplifications, including techniques that, when run repeatedly until fixpoint, can be too costly. Unhiding can also be applied during search, taking learnt clauses into account. We show that Unhiding gives performance improvements on real-world SAT competition benchmarks.

The 1st author is financially supported by Dutch Organization for Scientific Research (grant 617.023.611), the 2nd author by Academy of Finland (grant 132812) and the 1st and 3rd author are supported by the Austrian Science Foundation (FWF) NFN Grant S11408-N23 (RiSE).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bacchus, F.: Enhancing Davis Putnam with extended binary clause reasoning. In: Proc. AAAI, pp. 613–619. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Eén, N., Biere, A.: Effective preprocessing in SAT through variable and clause elimination. In: Bacchus, F., Walsh, T. (eds.) SAT 2005. LNCS, vol. 3569, pp. 61–75. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Gershman, R., Strichman, O.: Cost-effective hyper-resolution for preprocessing CNF formulas. In: Bacchus, F., Walsh, T. (eds.) SAT 2005. LNCS, vol. 3569, pp. 423–429. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Han, H., Somenzi, F.: Alembic: An efficient algorithm for CNF preprocessing. In: Proc. DAC, pp. 582–587. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Järvisalo, M., Biere, A., Heule, M.J.H.: Blocked clause elimination. In: Esparza, J., Majumdar, R. (eds.) TACAS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6015, pp. 129–144. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Heule, M.J.H., Järvisalo, M., Biere, A.: Clause elimination procedures for CNF formulas. In: Fermüller, C.G., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR-17. LNCS, vol. 6397, pp. 357–371. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Marques-Silva, J.P.: Algebraic simplification techniques for propositional satisfiability. In: Dechter, R. (ed.) CP 2000. LNCS, vol. 1894, pp. 537–542. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Van Gelder, A.: Toward leaner binary-clause reasoning in a satisfiability solver. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 43(1), 239–253 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Li, C.M.: Integrating equivalency reasoning into Davis-Putnam procedure. In: Proc. AAAI, pp. 291–296 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brafman, R.: A simplifier for propositional formulas with many binary clauses. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B 34(1), 52–59 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Aho, A., Garey, M., Ullman, J.: The transitive reduction of a directed graph. SIAM Journal on Computing 1(2), 131–137 (1972)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Biere, A.: Lingeling, Plingeling, PicoSAT and PrecoSAT at SAT Race 2010. FMV Report Series Technical Report 10/1, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. del Val, Á.: Simplifying binary propositional theories into connected components twice as fast. In: Nieuwenhuis, R., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2250, pp. 392–406. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Soos, M.: Cryptominisat 2.5.0, sat race 2010 solver description (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Korovin, K.: iProver – an instantiation-based theorem prover for first-order logic (System description). In: Armando, A., Baumgartner, P., Dowek, G. (eds.) IJCAR 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5195, pp. 292–298. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Groote, J.F., Warners, J.P.: The propositional formula checker HeerHugo. J. Autom. Reasoning 24(1/2), 101–125 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Tarjan, R.: Depth-first search and linear graph algorithms. SIAM J. Computing 1(2) (1972)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Heule, M.J.H., Järvisalo, M., Biere, A. (2011). Efficient CNF Simplification Based on Binary Implication Graphs. In: Sakallah, K.A., Simon, L. (eds) Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing - SAT 2011. SAT 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6695. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21581-0_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21581-0_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21580-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21581-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics