Impact Analysis of Process Improvement on IT Service Quality

  • Marion Lepmets
  • Eric Ras
  • Alain Renault
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 82)

Abstract

Process improvement focuses primarily on the improvement of process management and not explicitly on the improvement of the intrinsic qualities of a service or a product. Similarly to the lack of studies concerning calculations of ROI in process improvement, there is a lack of studies evaluating the impact of process improvement on the intrinsic qualities of products and/or services. The customers are more interested in the quality of the product or service and less in the speed of development or automation of processes. This paper highlights why it is necessary to investigate the impact of process improvement on IT service qualityand describes how the listed research questions will be addressed.

Keywords

Process Improvement IT Service Management IT Service Quality ImpactAnalysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Barafort, B., Di Renzo, B., Merlan, O.: Benefits Resulting from the Combined Use of ISO/IEC 15504 with the Information Technology Infrastructure Library (ITIL). In: Oivo, M., Komi-Sirviö, S. (eds.) PROFES 2002. LNCS, vol. 2559, pp. 314–325. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Herbsleb, J., Carleton, A., Rozum, J., Siegel, J., Zubrow, D.: Benefits of CMMI-Based Software Process Improvement: Initial Results. Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh (1994)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Iversen, J.H.: Data-driven Intervention in SPI Practice. Computer Science. Aalborg University, Aalborg (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kinnula, A.: Software Process Engineering Systems: Models and Industry Cases. University of Oulu, Oulu (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    O’Hara, F.: European Experiences with Software Process Improvement. In: International Conference in Software Engineering, pp. 635–640. ACM, Limerick (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jones, C.: The economics of software process improvement. Computer 29(1), 95–97 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hansen, B., Rose, J., Tjornehoj, G.: Prescription, description, reflection: the shape of the software process improvement field. International Journal of Information Management 24, 457–472 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    St-Jean, M.: TIPA to keep ITIL going and going. In: O’Connor, R.V., Baddoo, N., Cuadrago Gallego, J., Rejas Muslera, R., Smolander, K., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2009. CCIS, vol. 42. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    El Emam, K., Birk, A.: Validating the ISO/IEC 15504 Measure of Software Requirements Analysis Process Capability. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 26, 541–566 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goldenson, D.R., Herbsleb, J.: After the Appraisal: A Systematic Survey of Process Imporvement, Its Benefits, and Factors that Influence Success. Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh (1995)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jiang, J.J., Klein, G., Hwang, H.-G., Huang, J., Hung, S.-Y.: An explanation of the relationship between software development process maturity and project performance. Information and Management 41, 279–288 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Verner, J.M., Evanco, W.M.: In-house Software Development: What Project management Practices Lead to Success. IEEE Software 22, 86–93 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fryer, K.J., Antony, J., Douglas, A.: Critical success factors of continuous improvement in the public sector - A literature review and some key findings. The TQM Magazine 19, 497–517 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Humphrey, S.W.: Managing the Software Process. Software Engineering Institute (1989)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lepasaar, M., Varkoi, T., Jaakkola, H.: Models and success factors of process change. In: Bomarius, F., Komi-Sirviö, S. (eds.) PROFES 2001. LNCS, vol. 2188, p. 68. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rainer, A., Hall, T.: Key success factors for implementing software process improvement: a maturity-based analysis. Journal of Systems and Software 62, 71–84 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zahran, S.: Software Process Improvement - Practical Guidelines for Business Success. Addison-Wesley Professional, Reading (1998)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Börjesson, A., Baaz, A., Pries-Heje, J., Timmeras, M.: Measuring process innovation and improvements. In: McMaster, T., Wastell, D., Ferneley, E., J., D. (eds.) Organizational Dynamics of Technology-Based Innovation: Diversifying the Research Agenda, vol. 235. Springer, Boston (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dyba, T.: An Instrument for Measuring the Key Factors of Success in Software Process Improvement. Empirical Software Engineering 5, 357–390 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Freeman, R.E., Wicks, A.C., Parmar, B.: Stakeholder Theory and The Corporate Objective Revisited. Organization Science 14 (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hall, T., Baddoo, N., Wilson, D.C.: Measurement in Software Process Improvement Programmes: An Empirical Study. In: Dumke, R.R., Abran, A. (eds.) IWSM 2000. LNCS, vol. 2006, pp. 73–82. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lepmets, M.: Evaluation of Basic Project Management Activities - Study in Software Industry. Computer Science. Tampere University of Technology, Pori (2007)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Subramanian, G.H., Jiang, J.J., Klein, G.: Software quality and IS project performance improvements from software development process maturity and IS implementation strategies. Journal of Systems and Software 80, 616–627 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lloyd, V., Rudd, C.: ITIL Service Design. OGC, London (2007)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Polter, S., et al.: ISO/IEC 20000 - An Introduction, 1st edn. Van Haren Publishing, Zaltbommel (2008)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Parasuraman, A., et al.: Refinement and Reassessment of the SERVQUAL Scale. Journal of Retailing 67, 420–450 (1991)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    ISO/IEC JTC1 SC7, ISO/IEC FCD 25010, Systems and software engineering - System and software product Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) - System and software models (2009)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Practical Software and Systems Measurement: A Foundation for Objective Project Management, v. 4.0b1 (2000), www.psmsc.com
  29. 29.
    itSMF Global Survey on Service Management experience, itSMF International (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marion Lepmets
    • 1
  • Eric Ras
    • 1
  • Alain Renault
    • 1
  1. 1.Public Research Centre Henri TudorLuxembourg-KirchbergLuxembourg

Personalised recommendations