How End-User Development Will Save Composition Technologies from Their Continuing Failures

  • Fabio Casati
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6654)


In this paper I discuss the motivation behind the continuing failure of composition technologies (workflows, service composition, mashups)over the past two decades, as well as the repeated mistakes we (the IT community, including companies) keep making. I then argue that, despite this, we do need these technologies, now more than ever, and that EUD is the driver behind this need, so the non-programmer has to be the target user for these platforms. Next, I share ideas as well as research results on how to design and develop composition tools that can be “programmed” by end user to define fairly complex logic both in the case of process-oriented applications and of mashups. These ideas are instantiated in a set of principles as well as in composition languages and tools developed in cooperation with our research and industrial partners. 


Service Composition Model Business Process Complex Logic XPath Expression Composition Logic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Alonso, et al.: Web Services. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Casati, F.: How End-User Development Will Save Composition Technologies from their Constant Failures, Available from
  3. 3.
    Recker, J., Safrudin, N., Rosemann, M.: How novices model business processes. In: Hull, R., Mendling, J., Tai, S. (eds.) BPM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6336, pp. 29–44. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chowdhury, R., et al.: Wisdom-Aware Computing: On the Interactive Recommendation of Composition Knowledge. In: WESOA 2010 (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Greenshpan, O., Milo, T., Polyzotis, N.: Autocompletion for Mashups. In: VLDB 2009 (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Namoun, A., Nestler, T., DeAngeli, A.: Service Composition for Non Programmers: Prospects, Problems, and Design Recommendations. In: ECOWS 2010 (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wong, J., Hong, J.I.: Making mashups with marmite: towards end-user programming for the web. In: CHI 2007 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mehandjiev, N., Lecue, F., Wajid, U., Namoun, A.: Assisted Service Composition for End-Users. In: ECOWS 2010 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fabio Casati
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information Engineering and Computer ScienceUniversity of TrentoItaly

Personalised recommendations