Advertisement

Privacy Online pp 191-203 | Cite as

Mobile Privacy: Contexts

  • Maren HartmannEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

On the following Wednesday, Facebook announced several changes to its mobile services, including a new product called “Deals” – a platform for local stores and places to offer deals to nearby Facebook users. The users’ location data would be used in the process. The privacy implications were not explicitly addressed in the announcement. This kind of combination of social media and mobility does, however, lead to many questions concerning privacy.

Keywords

Technological Solution Location Privacy Privacy Setting Mobile IPv6 Contextual Integrity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ardagna CA, Cremonini M, Damiani E, De Capitani di Vimercati S, Samarati P (2008) Privacy enhanced location services information. In: Acquisti A et al (eds) Digital privacy: theory, technologies, and practices. Auerbach, New York, pp 307–326Google Scholar
  2. Arendt H (1989/1958) The human condition. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  3. Beckwith R (2003) The human experience. Designing for ubiquity: the perception of privacy. Pervasive Comput 2(2):40–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bourdieu P (1984) Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press, HarvardGoogle Scholar
  5. boyd d (2010) Making sense of privacy and publicity. Talk presented at SXSW, Austin, 13 Mar. http://www.danah.org/papers/talks/2010/SXSW2010.html. Accessed 6 Dec 2010
  6. Dey AK (2001) Understanding and using context. Pers Ubiquit Comput 5(1):4–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Green N, Haddon L (2009) Mobile communications: an introduction to new media. Berg, Oxford/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Nissenbaum H (2010) Privacy in context: technology, policy, and the integrity of social life. Stanford University Press, Palo AltoGoogle Scholar
  9. Perkins C, Johnson D, Arkko J (2010) Mobility support in IPv6. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mext-rfc3775bis-08. Accessed 10 Jan 2011
  10. Privacy International (2007) The 2007 international privacy ranking. http://www.privacyinternational.org/article.shtml?cmd%5B347%5D=x-347-559597. Accessed 6 Dec 2010
  11. Radwanski G (2002) Letter to the honourable Roy Romanow. http://www.priv.gc.ca/media/le_ehr_020627_e.cfm. Accessed 10 Jan 2011
  12. Singh V (2008) Context-awareness: control over disclosure and privacy in a social environment. TKK technical reports in computer science and engineering, Helsinki University of Technology Department of Computer Science and Engineering. http://www.cse.tkk.fi/en/publications/B/1/papers/VSingh_final.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2011
  13. Urry J (2002) Mobility and connections. Unpublished paper. Paris, Apr 2002. http://www.ville-en-mouvement.com/telechargement/040602/mobility.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2011
  14. Urry J (2007) Mobilities. Polity, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. Warren P (2009) The end of privacy? The guardian, 2 Apr 2009. http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/apr/02/google-privacy-mobile-phone-industry. Accessed 29 Jan 2011
  16. Warren SD, Brandeis LD (1890) The right to privacy. Harv Law Rev 4(5)Google Scholar
  17. Weiß R, Groebel J (eds) (2002) Privatheit im öffentlichen Raum. Medienhandeln zwischen Individualisierung und Entgrenzung? Leske & Budrich, OpladenGoogle Scholar
  18. Westin A (1968) Privacy and freedom. Atheneum, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Berlin University of ArtsBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations