Adaptable Processes (Extended Abstract)

  • Mario Bravetti
  • Cinzia Di Giusto
  • Jorge A. Pérez
  • Gianluigi Zavattaro
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6722)


We propose the concept of adaptable processes as a way of overcoming the limitations that process calculi have for describing patterns of dynamic process evolution. Such patterns rely on direct ways of controlling the behavior and location of running processes, and so they are at the heart of the adaptation capabilities present in many modern concurrent systems. Adaptable processes have a location and are sensible to actions of dynamic update at runtime. This allows to express a wide range of evolvability patterns for processes. We introduce a core calculus of adaptable processes and propose two verification problems for them: bounded and eventual adaptation. While the former ensures that at most k consecutive errors will arise in future states, the latter ensures that if the system enters into an error state then it will eventually reach a correct state. We study the (un)decidability of these two problems in different fragments of the calculus. Rather than a specification language, our calculus intends to be a basis for investigating the fundamental properties of evolvable processes and for developing richer languages with evolvability capabilities.


Cloud Computing Adaptable Process Eventual Adaptation Parallel Composition Label Transition System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Abdulla, P.A., Cerans, K., Jonsson, B., Tsay, Y.-K.: Algorithmic analysis of programs with well quasi-ordered domains. Inf. Comput. 160(1-2), 109–127 (2000)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Acciai, L., Boreale, M.: Deciding safety properties in infinite-state pi-calculus via behavioural types. In: Albers, S., Marchetti-Spaccamela, A., Matias, Y., Nikoletseas, S., Thomas, W. (eds.) ICALP 2009. LNCS, vol. 5556, pp. 31–42. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baeten, J., Bergstra, J.: Mode transfer in process algebra. Technical Report Report 00/01, Eindhoven University of Technology (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berger, M., Honda, K.: The two-phase commitment protocol in an extended pi-calculus. Electr. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 39(1) (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bravetti, M., Di Giusto, C., Pérez, J.A., Zavattaro, G.: Adaptable processes. Technical report, Univ. of Bologna, (2011), Draft,
  6. 6.
    Bravetti, M., Di Giusto, C., Pérez, J.A., Zavattaro, G.: Steps on the Road to Component Evolvability. Post-proceedings of FACS 2010. LNCS. Springer, Heidelberg (to appear, 2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bravetti, M., Zavattaro, G.: On the expressive power of process interruption and compensation. Math. Struct. in Comp. Sci. 19(3), 565–599 (2009)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bundgaard, M., Godskesen, J.C., Hildebrandt, T.: Bisimulation congruences for homer — a calculus of higher order mobile embedded resources. Technical Report TR-2004-52, IT University of Copenhagen (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Busi, N., Gabbrielli, M., Zavattaro, G.: On the expressive power of recursion, replication and iteration in process calculi. Math. Struct. in Comp. Sci. 19(6), 1191–1222 (2009)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Delzanno, G., Sangnier, A., Zavattaro, G.: Parameterized verification of ad hoc networks. In: Gastin, P., Laroussinie, F. (eds.) CONCUR 2010. LNCS, vol. 6269, pp. 313–327. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Esparza, J.: Some applications of petri nets to the analysis of parameterised systems. Talk at WISP 2003 (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Esparza, J., Finkel, A., Mayr, R.: On the verification of broadcast protocols. In: Proc. of LICS, pp. 352–359 (1999)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Finkel, A., Schnoebelen, P.: Well-structured transition systems everywhere! Theor. Comput. Sci. 256(1-2), 63–92 (2001)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Francalanza, A., Hennessy, M.: A fault tolerance bisimulation proof for consensus (Extended abstract). In: De Nicola, R. (ed.) ESOP 2007. LNCS, vol. 4421, pp. 395–410. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kruskal, J.B.: Well-quasi-ordering, the tree theorem, and vazsonyi’s conjecture. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 95(2), 210–225 (1960)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Milner, R.: Comunication and Concurrency. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1989)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Minsky, M.: Computation: Finite and Infinite Machines. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1967)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nestmann, U., Fuzzati, R., Merro, M.: Modeling consensus in a process calculus. In: Amadio, R.M., Lugiez, D. (eds.) CONCUR 2003. LNCS, vol. 2761, pp. 399–414. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pérez, J.A.: Higher-Order Concurrency: Expressiveness and Decidability Results. PhD thesis, University of Bologna (2010), Draft,
  20. 20.
    Riely, J., Hennessy, M.: Distributed processes and location failures. Theor. Comput. Sci. 266(1-2), 693–735 (2001); An extended abstract appeared in Proc. of ICALP 1997CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sangiorgi, D.: Expressing Mobility in Process Algebras: First-Order and Higher-Order Paradigms. PhD thesis CST–99–93, University of Edinburgh, Dept. of Comp. Sci. (1992)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schmitt, A., Stefani, J.-B.: The kell calculus: A family of higher-order distributed process calculi. In: Priami, C., Quaglia, P. (eds.) GC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3267, pp. 146–178. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wies, T., Zufferey, D., Henzinger, T.A.: Forward analysis of depth-bounded processes. In: Ong, L. (ed.) FOSSACS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6014, pp. 94–108. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mario Bravetti
    • 1
  • Cinzia Di Giusto
    • 2
  • Jorge A. Pérez
    • 3
  • Gianluigi Zavattaro
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory FOCUSUniversità di Bologna / INRIAItaly
  2. 2.INRIA Rhône-AlpesGrenobleFrance
  3. 3.CITI - Dept. of Computer ScienceFCT New University of LisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations