An Incremental Model of Lexicon Consensus in a Population of Agents by Means of Grammatical Evolution, Reinforcement Learning and Semantic Rules

  • Jack Mario Mingo
  • Ricardo Aler
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6686)

Abstract

We present an incremental model of lexicon consensus in a population of simulated agents. The emergent lexicon is evolved with a hybrid algorithm which is based on grammatical evolution with semantic rules and reinforcement learning. The incremental model allows to add subsequently new agents and objects to the environment when a consensual language has emerged for a steady set of agents and objects. The main goal in the proposed system is to test whether the emergent lexicon can be maintained during the execution when new agents and object are added. The proposed system is completely based on grammars and the results achieved in the experiments show how building a language starting from a grammar can be a promising method in order to develop artificial languages.

Keywords

Swarm Intelligence Grammatical Evolution Language Acquisition and Language Development 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Briscoe, E.J.: Linguistic Evolution through Language Acquisition: formal and computational models. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kirby, S.: Natural Language from Artificial Life. Artificial Life 8(3), 185–215 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chomsky, N.: Three Models for the Description of Language. I.R.E Transactions on Information Theory IT-2, 113–124 (1956)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hashimoto, T., Ikegami, T.: Evolution of Symbolic Grammar Systems. In: Morán, F., Merelo, J.J., Moreno, A., Chacon, P. (eds.) ECAL 1995. LNCS, vol. 929, pp. 812–823. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Werner, G., Dyer, M.: Evolution of Communication in Artificial Organisms. In: Langton, C., et al. (eds.) Artificial Life II, pp. 659–687. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., Redwood City (1991)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yanko, H., Stein, L.: An Adaptive Communication Protocol for Cooperating Mobile Robots. In: Meyer, J.-A., Roitblat, H.-L., Wilson, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the Second Interntational Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior,From Animals to Animats 2, pp. 478–485. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1993)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Steels, L.: The Spontaneous Self-organization of an Adaptive Language. In: Muggleton, S. (ed.) Machine Intelligence 15. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1996)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Maravall, D., de Lope, J., Domínguez, R.: Self-emergence of Lexicon Consensus in a Population of Autonomous Agents by Means of Evolutionary Strategies. In: Corchado, E., Graña Romay, M., Manhaes Savio, A. (eds.) HAIS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6077, pp. 77–84. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vogt, P.: Language Evolution and robotics: Issues on symbol grounding and language acquisition. In: Loula, A., Gudwin, R., Queiroz, J. (eds.) Artificial Cognitive Systems, pp. 176–209. Idea Group, Herschey (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Deacon, T.: The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the human brain. Penguin Books (1997)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Harnard, S.: The symbol grounding problem. Physica D 42, 335–346 (1990)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vogt, P.: Lexicon Grounding on Mobile Robot. Ph. D. Thesis. Vrije Universiteit Brussel (2000)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Arkin, R.: Behaviour-Based Robotic. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Looveren, J.V.: Robotic experiments on the emergence of a lexicon. In: Ben, et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the 13th Belgium-Netherlands Conference on Artificial Intelligence, The Netherlands, Amsterdam (2001)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ryan, C., Collins, J.J., Neill, M.O.: Grammatical Evolution: Evolving Programs for an Arbitrary Language. In: Banzhaf, W., Poli, R., Schoenauer, M., Fogarty, T.C. (eds.) EuroGP 1998. LNCS, vol. 1391, pp. 83–95. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mingo, J.M., Aler, R.: Grammatical Evolution Guided by Reinforcement. IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 1475–1482 (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Watkins, C., Dayan, P.: Q-Learning. Machine Learning 8, 279–292 (1992)MATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mingo, J.M., Aler, R., Maravall, D.: Static and Dynamic Multi-Robot Coverage with Grammatical Evolution guided by Reinforcement Learning and Semantic Rules (Not published)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Aho, A.V., Sethi, R., Ullman, J.D.: Compilers: Principles, Techniques and Tools. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1986)MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jack Mario Mingo
    • 1
  • Ricardo Aler
    • 2
  1. 1.Computer Science DepartmentAutonomous University of MadridSpain
  2. 2.Computer Science DepartmentCarlos III University of MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations