UC 2011: Unconventional Computation pp 201-211 | Cite as
Computation with Narrow CTCs
Conference paper
Abstract
We examine some variants of computation with closed timelike curves (CTCs), where various restrictions are imposed on the memory of the computer, and the information carrying capacity and range of the CTC. We give full characterizations of the classes of languages recognized by polynomial time probabilistic and quantum computers that can send a single classical bit to their own past. Such narrow CTCs are demonstrated to add the power of limited nondeterminism to deterministic computers, and lead to exponential speedup in constant-space probabilistic and quantum computation.
Keywords
Stationary Distribution Core Model Regular Language Input String Language Recognition
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- [Aar05]Aaronson, S.: Quantum computing, postselection, and probabilistic polynomial-time. Proceedings of the Royal Society A 461(2063), 3473–3482 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- [AW02]Ambainis, A., Watrous, J.: Two–way finite automata with quantum and classical states. Theoretical Computer Science 287(1), 299–311 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- [AW09]Aaronson, S., Watrous, J.: Closed timelike curves make quantum and classical computing equivalent. Proceedings of the Royal Society A 465(2102), 631–647 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- [Bac04]Bacon, D.: Quantum computational complexity in the presence of closed timelike curves. Physical Review A 70(032309) (2004)Google Scholar
- [Deu91]Deutsch, D.: Quantum mechanics near closed timelike lines. Physical Review D 44(10), 3197–3217 (1991)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [DS92]Dwork, C., Stockmeyer, L.: Finite state verifiers I: The power of interaction. Journal of the ACM 39(4), 800–828 (1992)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- [Fre81]Freivalds, R.: Probabilistic two-way machines. In: Gruska, J., Chytil, M.P. (eds.) MFCS 1981. LNCS, vol. 118, pp. 33–45. Springer, Heidelberg (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [GHI67]Gray, J.N., Harrison, M.A., Ibarra, O.H.: Two-way pushdown automata. Information and Control 11, 30–70 (1967)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- [GW86]Greenberg, A.G., Weiss, A.: A lower bound for probabilistic algorithms for finite state machines. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 33(1), 88–105 (1986)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- [Her97]Herzog, C.: Pushdown automata with bounded nondeterminism and bounded ambiguity. Theoretical Computer Science 181, 141–157 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- [MTY88]Morris, M.S., Thorne, K.S., Yurtsever, U.: Wormholes, time machines, and the weak energy condition. Physical Review Letters 61(13), 1446–1449 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [She59]Shepherdson, J.C.: The reduction of two–way automata to one-way automata. IBM Journal of Research and Development 3, 198–200 (1959)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- [Sip06]Sipser, M.: Introduction to the Theory of Computation, 2nd edn. Thomson Course Technology, United States of America (2006)MATHGoogle Scholar
- [SY11]Say, A.C.C., Yakaryılmaz, A.: Computation with narrow CTCs. Technical Report arXiv:1007.3624 (2011)Google Scholar
- [YS10]Yakaryılmaz, A., Say, A.C.C.: Succinctness of two-way probabilistic and quantum finite automata. Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science 12(4), 19–40 (2010)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- [YS11a]Yakaryılmaz, A., Say, A.C.C.: Probabilistic and quantum finite automata with postselection. Technical Report arXiv:1102.0666 (2011)Google Scholar
- [YS11b]Yakaryılmaz, A., Say, A.C.C.: Unbounded-error quantum computation with small space bounds. Information and Computation 279(6), 873–892 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011