Identifying Molecular Organic Codes in Reaction Networks

  • Dennis Görlich
  • Peter Dittrich
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5777)

Abstract

Studying semantics is strongly connected to studying codes that link signs to meanings. Here we suggest a formal method to identify organic codes at a molecular level. We define a molecular organic code with respect to a given reaction network as a mapping between two sets of molecular species called signs and meanings, respectively, such that (a) this mapping can be realized by a third set of molecular species, the codemaker and (b) there exists alternative sets of molecular species, i.e., alternative codemakers, implying different mappings between the same two sets of signals and meanings. We discuss theoretical implications of our definition, demonstrate its application on two abstract examples, and show that it is compatible to Barbieri’s definition of organic codes. Our approach can be applied to differentiate the semantic capacity of molecular sub-systems found in the living world. We hypothesize that we find an increasing capacity when going from metabolism to protein networks to gene regulatory networks. Finally we hypothesize that during the chemical and Darwinian evolution of life the capacity for molecular organic codes increased by the discovery and incorporation of those reaction systems that contain many molecular organic codes.

Keywords

Molecular Species Genetic Code Gene Regulatory Network Reaction Network Organic Code 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Küppers, B.O.: Information and the Origin of Life. MIT Press, Cambridge (1990)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shannon, C.E.: A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell Systems Technical Journal 27, 379–423, 623–656 (1948) (reprinted with corrections)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arndt, C.: Information Measures: Information and Its Description in Science and Engineering. Signals and Communication Technology, vol. 1. Springer, Berlin (2004)MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yockey, H.P.: Information Theory, Evolution, and the Origin of Life. Cambridge University Press, New York (2005)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Anderson, D.R.: Model Based Inference in the Life Sciences. Springer, Berlin (2008)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barbieri, M. (ed.): Biosemiotics: Information, Codes and Signs in Living Systems. Nova Science Publisher, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barbieri, M. (ed.): The Codes of Life: The Rules of Macroevolution, 1st edn. Biosemiotics, vol. 1. Springer, Netherlands (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Favareau, D. (ed.): Essential Readings in Biosemiotics. Biosemiotics, vol. 3. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barbieri, M.: The Organic Codes: An introduction to Semantic Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Barbieri, M.: Biosemiotics: a new understanding of life. Naturwissenschaften 95(7), 577–599 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Faria, M.: Signal transduction codes and cell fate. In: Barbieri, M. (ed.) The Codes of Life: The Rules of Macroevolution, pp. 265–283. Springer, Dodrecht (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gabius, H., Andre, S., Kaltner, H., Siebert, H.: The sugar code: functional lectinomics. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta-General Subjects 1572(2-3), 165–177 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Turner, B.M.: Cellular memory and the histone code. Cell 111(3), 285–291 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Turner, B.M.: Defining an epigenetic code. Nat. Cell. Biol. 9(1), 2–6 (2007)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fontana, W., Buss, L.W.: ’The arrival of the fittest’: Toward a theory of biological organization. Bull. Math. Biol. 56, 1–64 (1994)MATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Speroni di Fenizio, P., Dittrich, P., Ziegler, J., Banzhaf, W.: Towards a theory of organizations. In: German Workshop on Artificial Life (GWAL 2000), Bayreuth, April 5-7 (2000)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Szathmáry, E.: Coding coenzyme handles: a hypothesis for the origin of the genetic code. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90(21), 9916–9920 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yarus, M., Caporaso, J.G., Knight, R.: Origins of the genetic code: the escaped triplet theory. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 74, 179–198 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Koonin, E.V., Novozhilov, A.S.: Origin and evolution of the genetic code: the universal enigma. IUBMB Life 61(2), 99–111 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Adami, C., Ofria, C., Collier, T.C.: Evolution of biological complexity. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 4463–4468 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dittrich, P., Speroni di Fenizio, P.: Chemical organization theory. Bull. Math. Biol. 69(4), 1199–1231 (2007)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dennis Görlich
    • 1
  • Peter Dittrich
    • 1
  1. 1.Bio Systems Analysis Group, Jena Centre for Bioinformatics (JCB) and Department of Mathematics and Computer ScienceFriedrich-Schiller University JenaJenaGermany

Personalised recommendations