Controlling Multi-party Interaction within Normative Multi-agent Organizations

  • Olivier Boissier
  • Flavien Balbo
  • Fabien Badeig
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6541)


Multi-party communications taking place within organizations lead to different interaction modes such as (in)direct communication between roles, (in)direct communication restricted to a group, etc. Fully normative organisations need to regulate and control those modes as they do for agents’ behaviors. However, this problem is not well addressed in current organisation model proposals. This paper proposes thus to extend the normative organization model \(\mathcal{M}\)oise in order to specify such interaction modes. This specification has two purposes: (i) to make the multi-agent organization able to monitor the interaction between the agents, (ii) to make the agents able to reason on these modes as they can do on norms. The paper is focused on the first point. We illustrate with a crisis management application how this extension enlarges the scope of expression of the interaction capabilities and how it has been implemented on the Easi interaction model.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bensaid, N., Mathieu, P.: A hybrid architecture for hierarchical agents. In: Veram, B., Yao, X. (eds.) Proceedings of the 1997 International Conference on Computationnal Intelligence and Multimedia Applications (ICCIMA 1997), pp. 91–95. Watson Ferguson & Co. (1997)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Esteva, M., Rodriguez-Aguiar, J.A., Sierra, C., Garcia, P., Arcos, J.L.: On the formal specification of electronic institutions. In: Dignum, F., Sierra, C. (eds.) Proceedings of the Agent-mediated Electronic Commerce. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1191, pp. 126–147. Springer, Berlin (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ferber, J., Gutknecht, O.: A meta-model for the analysis and design of organizations in multi-agents systems. In: Demazeau, Y. (ed.) Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS 1998), pp. 128–135. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hübner, J.F., Sichman, J.S., Boissier, O.: A model for the structural, functional, and deontic specification of organizations in multiagent systems. In: Bittencourt, G., Ramalho, G.L. (eds.) SBIA 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2507, pp. 118–128. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hübner, J., Boissier, O., Bordini, R.: A normative organisation programming language for organisation management infrastructures. In: Padget, J., Artikis, A., Vasconcelos, W., Stathis, K., da Silva, V., Matson, E., Polleres, A. (eds.) COIN@AAMAS 2009. LNCS, vol. 6069, pp. 114–129. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hübner, J., Boissier, O., Kitio, R., Ricci, A.: Instrumenting multi-agent organisations with organisational artifacts and agents. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 20, 369–400 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Saunier, J., Balbo, F.: Regulated multi-party communications and context awareness through the environment. Journal on Multi-Agent and Grid Systems 5(1), 75–91 (2009)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tummolini, L., Castelfranchi, C., Ricci, A., Viroli, M., Omicini, A.: “Exhibitionists” and “Voyeurs” do it better: A shared environment for flexible coordination with tacit messages. In: Weyns, D., Van Dyke Parunak, H., Michel, F. (eds.) E4MAS 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3374, pp. 215–231. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olivier Boissier
    • 1
  • Flavien Balbo
    • 2
    • 3
  • Fabien Badeig
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Ecole Nationale Supérieure des MinesSaint-EtienneFrance
  2. 2.Université Paris-Dauphine - LAMSADEParis 16 CedexFrance
  3. 3.INRETS - GRETIANoisy Le GrandFrance

Personalised recommendations