Organizational Support for Process Improvement – Results of an International Survey

  • Marion Lepmets
  • Eric Ras
  • Alain Renault
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 155)

Abstract

Organizational support for process improvement initiatives is vital to the success of these improvements. This paper describes and explores the steps of supporting process improvements described in the new international standard ISO/IEC 33014 that is currently being developed.

Keywords

process improvement organizational support organizational readiness ISO/IEC 33014 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Arent, J.: Transforming Software Organizations with the Capability Maturity Model. In: Proceedings of the Product Focused Software Process Improvement at PROFES, pp. 103–113 (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lepasaar, M., Varkoi, T., Jaakkola, H.: Models and success factors of process change. In: Product Focused Software Development and Process Improvement, PROFES (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Paulk, M.C., Weber, C., Chrissis, M.B.: The Capability Maturity Model for Software. In: Elements of Software Process Assessment and Improvement, pp. 3–15. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Varkoi, T.: Software Process Improvement Priorities in Small Enterprises. Information Technology, vol. Licentiate of Technology. Tampere University of Technology, Pori (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Humphrey, S.W.: Managing the Software Process. Software Engineering Institute (1989)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grover, V.: From Business Reengineering to Business Process Change Management: A Longitudinal Study of Trends and Practices. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 46, 36–46 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zahran, S.: Software Process Improvement - Practical Guidelines for Business Success. Addison-Wesley Professional, Reading (1998)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Statz, J.: Measurement for Process Improvement v.1.0. Practical Software and Systems Measurement (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Morten Korsaa, M.B., Messnarz, R., Johansen, J., Vohwinkel, D., Nevalainen, R., Schweigert, T.: The SPI manifesto and the ECQA SPI manager certification scheme. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    ISO/IEC JTC1 SC7: ISO/IEC PDTR 33014.4 - Information technology — Process assessment — Guide for process improvement (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pries-Heje, J., Johansen, J.: Improve IT- A book for improving software projects. Copenhagen (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    ISO/IEC 15504-2, Information technology - Software process assessment - A reference model for processes and process capability. 15504, vol. 2 (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    McFeeley, B.: IDEAL: A User’s Guide for Software Process Improvement (1996)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cunningham, J.B.: Case study principles for different types of cases. Quality and Quantity 31, 401–423 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Barafort, B., Di Renzo, B., Merlan, O.: Benefits Resulting from the Combined Use of ISO/IEC 15504 with the Information Technology Infrastructure Library (ITIL). In: Oivo, M., Komi-Sirviö, S. (eds.) PROFES 2002. LNCS, vol. 2559, pp. 314–325. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jones, C.: The economics of software process improvement. Computer 29, 95–97 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marion Lepmets
    • 1
  • Eric Ras
    • 1
  • Alain Renault
    • 1
  1. 1.Public Research Centre Henri TudorLuxembourgLuxembourg

Personalised recommendations