Model-Based Transfer Functions for Efficient Visualization of Medical Image Volumes

  • Daniel Forsberg
  • Claes Lundström
  • Mats Andersson
  • Hans Knutsson
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6688)


The visualization of images with a large dynamic range is a difficult task and this is especially the case for gray-level images. In radiology departments, this will force radiologists to review medical images several times, since the images need to be visualized with several different contrast windows (transfer functions) in order for the full information content of each image to be seen. Previously suggested methods for handling this situation include various approaches using histogram equalization and other methods for processing the image data. However, none of these utilize the underlying human anatomy in the images to control the visualization and the fact that different transfer functions are often only relevant for disjoint anatomical regions.

In this paper, we propose a method for using model-based local transfer functions. It allows the reviewing radiologist to apply multiple transfer functions simultaneously to a medical image volume. This provides the radiologist with a tool for making the review process more efficient, by allowing him/her to review more of the information in a medical image volume with a single visualization. The transfer functions are automatically assigned to different anatomically relevant regions, based upon a model registered to the volume to be visualized. The transfer functions can be either pre-defined or interactively changed by the radiologist during the review process. All of this is achieved without adding any unfamiliar aspects to the radiologist’s normal work-flow, when reviewing medical image volumes.


  1. 1.
    Castillo, R., Castillo, E., Guerra, R., Johnson, V.E., McPhail, T., Garg, A.K., Guerrero, T.: A framework for evaluation of deformable image registration spatial accuracy using large landmark point sets. Physics in Medicine and Biology 54(7), 1849–1870 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Choi, R.J., F.L.R.: Multi-grayscale overlay window. US Patent Application Appl. No.: 12/175,308 (January 2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Forsberg, D., Andersson, M., Knutsson, H.: Adaptive anisotropic regularization of deformation fields for non-rigid registration using the morphon framework. In: ICASSP, Dallas, USA (March 2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hidajat, N., Schroeder, R.J., Cordes, M., Felix, R.: Simultaneous presentation of soft tissue and bone tissue in computed tomography with combined window. Computers in Biology and Medicine 37(11), 1629–1636 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Janssens, G., Jacques, L., de Xivry, J.O., Geets, X., Macq, B.: Diffeomorphic registration of images with variable contrast enhancement. International Journal of Biomedical Imaging (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jin, Y., Fayad, L.M., Laine, A.F.: Contrast enhancement by multiscale adaptive histogram equalization. Presented at the Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference.SPIE, vol. 4478, pp. 206–213 (December 2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    John, A., Huda, W., Scalzetti, E.M., Ogden, K.M., Roskopf, M.L.: Performance of a single lookup table (LUT) for displaying chest CT images. Academic Radiology 11(6), 609–616 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Knutsson, H., Andersson, M.: Morphons: Paint on priors and elastic canvas for segmentation and registration, Joensuu (June 2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lindholm, S., Ljung, P., Lundström, C., Persson, A., Ynnerman, A.: Spatial conditioning of transfer functions using local material distributions. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 16(6), 1301–1310 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lundström, C., Ljung, P., Ynnerman, A.: Local histograms for design of transfer functions in direct volume rendering. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 12(6), 1570–1579 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pizer, S.M.: Intensity mappings to linearize display devices. Computer Graphics and Image Processing 17(3), 262–268 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pizer, S.M., Amburn, E.P., Austin, J.D., Cromartie, R., Geselowitz, A., Greer, T., Romeny, B.T.H., Zimmerman, J.B.: Adaptive histogram equalization and its variations. Comput. Vision Graph. Image Process 39, 355–368 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zuiderveld, K.: Contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization, pp. 474–485. Academic Press Professional, London (1994)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Forsberg
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Claes Lundström
    • 2
    • 3
  • Mats Andersson
    • 1
    • 2
  • Hans Knutsson
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Biomedical EngineeringLinköping UniversitySweden
  2. 2.Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV)Linköping UniversitySweden
  3. 3.Sectra ImtecLinköpingSweden

Personalised recommendations