Advertisement

Assessing Safety of Object Pushing Using the Principle of Reversibility

  • Yuri Gavshin
  • Maarja Kruusmaa
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6678)

Abstract

This article presents an implementation of an innovative safety module for a robot control architecture. It applies the principle of reversibility to assess intrinsic safety of actions and to adapt robot’s behavior. The underlying idea is that all reversible actions are intrinsically safe. A practical experiment is conducted to demonstrate that a robot control architecture can develop complex safe behaviors. This is accomplished by using the safety module in conjunction with human-based knowledge and sufficiently high level of perception. A robot is placed in a room with a movable object while the safety module analyzes movements of the robot and the object. As the result, the robot can identify, for example, that pushing object into a corner is irreversible and thus unsafe.

Keywords

Reversibility safety abstract principles roboethics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Veruggio, G., Operto, F.: Roboethics: Social and ethical implications of robotics. In: Siciliano, B., Khatib, O. (eds.) Springer Handbook of Robotics, pp. 1499–1524. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sawyer, R.J.: Robot ethics. Science 318(5853), 1037 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arkin, R.C.: Governing lethal behavior: Embedding ethics in a hybrid deiberative/reactive robot architecture. Tech. Rep. GIT-GVU-07-11, Georgia Tech. (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kruusmaa, M., Gavshin, Y., Eppendahl, A.: Don’t do things you can’t undo: Reversibility models for generating safe behaviours. In: ICRA 2007, pp. 1134–1139 (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gavshin, Y., Kruusmaa, M.: Comparative experiments on the emergence of safe behaviours. In: TAROS 2008, pp. 65–71 (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Corchado, E., Abraham, A., de Carvalho, A.C.P.L.F.: Hybrid intelligent algorithms and applications. J. Inf. Sci. 180(14), 2633–2634 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Xavier, J., Pacheco, M., Castro, D., Ruano, A., Nunes, U.: Fast line, arc/circle and leg detection from laser scan data in a player driver. In: ICRA 2005, pp. 3930–3935 (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Arkin, R., Ulam, P.: An ethical adaptor: Behavioral modification derived from moral emotions. In: CIRA 2009, pp. 381–387 (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gerkey, B., Vaughan, R., Howard, A.: The player/stage project: Tools for multi-robot and distributed sensor systems. In: ICAR 2003, pp. 317–323 (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuri Gavshin
    • 1
  • Maarja Kruusmaa
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for BioroboticsTallinn University of TechnologyEstonia

Personalised recommendations