Assessing Safety of Object Pushing Using the Principle of Reversibility
This article presents an implementation of an innovative safety module for a robot control architecture. It applies the principle of reversibility to assess intrinsic safety of actions and to adapt robot’s behavior. The underlying idea is that all reversible actions are intrinsically safe. A practical experiment is conducted to demonstrate that a robot control architecture can develop complex safe behaviors. This is accomplished by using the safety module in conjunction with human-based knowledge and sufficiently high level of perception. A robot is placed in a room with a movable object while the safety module analyzes movements of the robot and the object. As the result, the robot can identify, for example, that pushing object into a corner is irreversible and thus unsafe.
KeywordsReversibility safety abstract principles roboethics
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.IFR Statistical Department, http://www.worldrobotics.org/downloads/PR_2010-09-14_service_EN.pdf
- 4.Arkin, R.C.: Governing lethal behavior: Embedding ethics in a hybrid deiberative/reactive robot architecture. Tech. Rep. GIT-GVU-07-11, Georgia Tech. (2007)Google Scholar
- 5.Kruusmaa, M., Gavshin, Y., Eppendahl, A.: Don’t do things you can’t undo: Reversibility models for generating safe behaviours. In: ICRA 2007, pp. 1134–1139 (2007)Google Scholar
- 6.Gavshin, Y., Kruusmaa, M.: Comparative experiments on the emergence of safe behaviours. In: TAROS 2008, pp. 65–71 (2008)Google Scholar
- 8.Xavier, J., Pacheco, M., Castro, D., Ruano, A., Nunes, U.: Fast line, arc/circle and leg detection from laser scan data in a player driver. In: ICRA 2005, pp. 3930–3935 (2005)Google Scholar
- 9.Arkin, R., Ulam, P.: An ethical adaptor: Behavioral modification derived from moral emotions. In: CIRA 2009, pp. 381–387 (2009)Google Scholar
- 10.Gerkey, B., Vaughan, R., Howard, A.: The player/stage project: Tools for multi-robot and distributed sensor systems. In: ICAR 2003, pp. 317–323 (2003)Google Scholar