Advertisement

Predicting Discussions on the Social Semantic Web

  • Matthew Rowe
  • Sofia Angeletou
  • Harith Alani
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6644)

Abstract

Social Web platforms are quickly becoming the natural place for people to engage in discussing current events, topics, and policies. Analysing such discussions is of high value to analysts who are interested in assessing up-to-the-minute public opinion, consensus, and trends. However, we have a limited understanding of how content and user features can influence the amount of response that posts (e.g., Twitter messages) receive, and how this can impact the growth of discussion threads. Understanding these dynamics can help users to issue better posts, and enable analysts to make timely predictions on which discussion threads will evolve into active ones and which are likely to wither too quickly. In this paper we present an approach for predicting discussions on the Social Web, by (a) identifying seed posts, then (b) making predictions on the level of discussion that such posts will generate. We explore the use of post-content and user features and their subsequent effects on predictions. Our experiments produced an optimum F 1 score of 0.848 for identifying seed posts, and an average measure of 0.673 for Normalised Discounted Cumulative Gain when predicting discussion levels.

Keywords

Support Vector Regression User Feature Content Feature Support Vector Regression Model Discussion Thread 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Adamic, L.A., Zhang, J., Bakshy, E., Ackerman, M.S.: Knowledge sharing and Yahoo Answers: Everyone knows something. In: Proceedings of WWW 2008, pp. 665–674. ACM, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bian, J., Liu, Y., Zhou, D., Agichtein, E., Zha, H.: Learning to Recognize Reliable Users and Content in Social Media with Coupled Mutual Reinforcement. In: 18th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2009) (April 2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bojars, U., Breslin, J.G., Peristeras, V., Tummarello, G., Decker, S.: Interlinking the social web with semantics. IEEE Intelligent Systems 23, 29–40 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boyd, D., Golder, S., Lotan, G.: Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on twitter. In: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1–10 (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F., Gummadi, K.P.: Measuring User Influence in Twitter: The Million Follower Fallacy. In: Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (May 2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goldhaber, M.H.: The Attention Economy and the Net. First Monday 2(4) (1997)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gunning, R.: The Technique of Clear Writing. McGraw-Hill, New York (1952)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hsu, C.-F., Khabiri, E., Caverlee, J.: Ranking Comments on the Social Web. In: International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering, CSE 2009, vol. 4 (August 2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Järvelin, K., Kekäläinen, J.: Cumulated gain-based evaluation of ir techniques. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 20, 422–446 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mishne, G., Glance, N.: Leave a Reply: An Analysis of Weblog Comments. In: Third annual workshop on the Weblogging ecosystem (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ratkiewicz, J., Menczer, F., Fortunato, S., Flammini, A., Vespignani, A.: Characterizing and modeling the dynamics of online popularity. Physical Review Letters (May 2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ritter, A., Cherry, C., Dolan, B.: Unsupervised Modeling of Twitter Conversations. In: Proc. HLT-NAACL 2010 (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Suh, B., Hong, L., Pirolli, P., Chi, E.H.: Want to be retweeted? Large scale analytics on factors impacting retweet in Twitter network. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Second International Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom), pp. 177–184 (August 2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Szabo, G., Huberman, B.A.: Predicting the popularity of online content. ACM Commun. 53(8), 80–88 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthew Rowe
    • 1
  • Sofia Angeletou
    • 1
  • Harith Alani
    • 1
  1. 1.Knowledge Media InstituteThe Open UniversityMilton KeynesUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations