Using Pseudo Feedback to Improve Cross-Lingual Ontology Mapping

  • Bo Fu
  • Rob Brennan
  • Declan O’Sullivan
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6643)

Abstract

Translation techniques are often employed by cross-lingual ontology mapping (CLOM) approaches to turn a cross-lingual mapping problem into a monolingual mapping problem which can then be solved by state of the art monolingual ontology matching tools. However in the process of doing so, noisy translations can compromise the quality of the matches generated by the subsequent monolingual matching techniques. In this paper, a novel approach to improve the quality of cross-lingual ontology mapping is presented and evaluated. The proposed approach adopts the pseudo feedback technique that is similar to the well understood relevance feedback mechanism used in the field of information retrieval. It is shown through the evaluation that pseudo feedback can improve the matching quality in a CLOM scenario.

Keywords

Cross-Lingual Ontology Mapping Pseudo Feedback 

References

  1. 1.
    Nirenburg, S., Raskin, V.: Ontological Semantics, Formal Ontology, and Ambiguity. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems, pp. 151–161 (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bateman, J.A.: Ontology Construction and Natural Language. In: Workshop on Formal Ontology in Conceptual Analysis and Knowledge Representation (1993)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Noy, N.F., McGuinness, D.L.: Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. Technical Report SMI-2001-0880, Stanford Medical Informatics (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Caracciolo, C., Sini, M., Keizer, J.: Requirements for the Treatment of Multilinguality in Ontologies within FAO. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on OWL: Experiences and Directions (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kerremans, K., Temmerman, R., Tummers, J.: Representing Multilingual and Culture-Specific Knowledge in a VAT Regulatory Ontology: Support from the Termontography Method. In: Chung, S. (ed.) OTM-WS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2889, pp. 662–674. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen, H., Wang, Y., Wang, H., Mao, Y., Tang, J., Zhou, C., Yin, A., Wu, Z.: Towards a Semantic Web of Relational Databases: a Practical Semantic Toolkit and an In-Use Case from Traditional Chinese Medicine. In: Cruz, I., Decker, S., Allemang, D., Preist, C., Schwabe, D., Mika, P., Uschold, M., Aroyo, L.M. (eds.) ISWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4273, pp. 750–763. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nichols, E., Bond, F., Tanaka, T., Fujita, S., Flickinger, D.: Multilingual Ontology Acquisition from Multiple MRDs. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Ontology Learning and Population, pp. 10–17 (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Buitelaar, P., Cimiano, P., Haase, P., Sintek, M.: Towards Linguistically Grounded Ontologies. In: Aroyo, L., Traverso, P., Ciravegna, F., Cimiano, P., Heath, T., Hyvönen, E., Mizoguchi, R., Oren, E., Sabou, M., Simperl, E. (eds.) ESWC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5554, pp. 111–125. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Peters, W., Montiel-Ponsoda, E., Aguado de Cea, G.: Localizing Ontologies in OWL. In: Proceedings of the OntoLex 2007 Workshop (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang, S., Isaac, A., Schopman, B., Schlobach, S., Van der Meij, L.: Matching Multi-lingual Subject Vocabularies. In: Agosti, M., Borbinha, J., Kapidakis, S., Papatheodorou, C., Tsakonas, G. (eds.) ECDL 2009. LNCS, vol. 5714, pp. 125–137. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Trojahn, C., Quaresma, P., Vieira, R.: A Framework for Multilingual Ontology Mapping. In: Proceedings of the 6th edn of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, pp. 1034–1037 (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang, X., Zhong, Q., Li, J., Tang, J., Xie, G., Li, H.: RiMOM Results for OAEI 2008. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Ontology Matching, pp. 182–189 (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Trojahn, C., Quaresma, P., Vieira, R.: An API for Multi-lingual Ontology Matching. In: Proceedings of the 7th Conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation, pp. 3830–3835 (2010) ISBN 2-9517408-6-7Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fu, B., Brennan, R., O’Sullivan, D.: Cross-Lingual Ontology Mapping – An Investigation of the Impact of Machine Translation. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Yu, Y., Ding, Y. (eds.) ASWC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5926, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fu, B., Brennan, R., O’Sullivan, D.: Cross-Lingual Ontology Mapping and Its Use on the Multilingual Semantic Web. In: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on the Multilingual Semantic Web, CEUR, vol. 571, pp. 13–20 (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liang, A., Sini, M.: Mapping AGROVOC & the Chinese Agricultural Thesaurus: Defini-tions, Tools Procedures. New Review of Hypermedia & Multimedia 12(1), 51–62 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ngai, G., Carpuat, M., Fung, P.: Identifying Concepts Across Languages: A First Step towards A Corpus-based Approach to Automatic Ontology Alignment. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, vol. 1, pp. 1–7 (2002)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pazienta, M., Stellato, A.: Linguistically Motivated Ontology Mapping for the Semantic Web. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Italian Semantic Web Workshop, pp. 14–16 (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jung, J.J., Håkansson, A., Hartung, R.: Indirect Alignment between Multilingual Ontologies: A Case Study of Korean and Swedish Ontologies. In: Håkansson, A., Nguyen, N.T., Hartung, R.L., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds.) KES-AMSTA 2009. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5559, pp. 233–241. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pazienza, M.T., Stellato, A.: Exploiting Linguistic Resources for Building Linguistically Motivated Ontologies in the Semantic Web. In: Proceedings of OntoLex Workshop 2006: Interfacing Ontologies and Lexical Resources for Semantic Web Technologies (2006)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bouma, G.: Cross-lingual Ontology Alignment using EuroWordNet and Wikipedia. In: Proceedings of the 7th Conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2010), pp. 1023–1028 (2010) ISBN 2-9517408-6-7Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Suárez-Figueroa, M.C., Gómez-Pérez, A.: First Attempt Towards A Standard Glossary of Ontology Engineering Terminology. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Terminology and Knowledge Engineering (2008)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ruthven, I., Lalmas, M.: A survey on the use of relevance feedback for information access systems. Knowledge Engineering Review 18(2), 95–145 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Duan, S., Fokoue, A., Srinivas, K.: One size does not fit all: Customizing Ontology Alignment using User Feedback. In: Patel-Schneider, P.F., Pan, Y., Hitzler, P., Mika, P., Zhang, L., Pan, J.Z., Horrocks, I., Glimm, B. (eds.) ISWC 2010, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6497. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Euzenat, J., Shvaiko, P.: Ontology Matching. Springer, Berlin (2007)MATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ichise, R.: Evaluation of Similarity Measures for Ontology Mapping. In: Hattori, H., Kawamura, T., Idé, T., Yokoo, M., Murakami, Y. (eds.) JSAI 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5447, pp. 15–25. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhao, G., Zheng, J., Meersman, R.: An Architecture Framework for Ontology Development. In: Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference (2003)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dou, D., McDermott, D., Qi, P.: Ontology Translation on the Semantic Web. Journal on Data Semantics II, 35–57 (2004)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nerbonne, J., Heeringa, W., Kleiweg, P.: Edit Distance and Dialect Proximity. In: Time Warps, String Edits and Macromolecules: The Theory and Practice of Sequence Comparison, 2nd edn., pp. v–xv. CSLI, Stanford (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bo Fu
    • 1
  • Rob Brennan
    • 1
  • Declan O’Sullivan
    • 1
  1. 1.Knowledge and Data Engineering Group, School of Computer Science and StatisticsTrinity College DublinIreland

Personalised recommendations