Advertisement

Assessment of Economic Management of Overlay Traffic: Methodology and Results

  • Ioanna Papafili
  • George D. Stamoulis
  • Rafal Stankiewicz
  • Simon Oechsner
  • Konstantin Pussep
  • Robert Wojcik
  • Jerzy Domzal
  • Dirk Staehle
  • Frank Lehrieder
  • Burkhard Stiller
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6656)

Abstract

Overlay applications generate huge amounts of traffic in the Internet, which determines a problem for Internet Service Providers, since it results in high charges for inter-domain traffic. Traditional traffic management techniques cannot deal successfully with overlay traffic. An incentive-based approach that employs economic concepts and mechanisms is required in order to deal with the overlay traffic in a way that is mutually beneficial for all stakeholders of the Future Internet. This "TripleWin" situation is the target of Economic Traffic Management (ETM). A wide variety of techniques are employed by ETM for optimizing overlay traffic management considering performance requirements of overlay and underlay networks together with cost implications for ISPs. However, the assessment of ETM requires an innovative methodology. In this article this methodology is described and major results are presented as obtained accordingly from the evaluation of different ETM mechanisms.

Keywords

Economic Traffic Management socio-economics TripleWin performance cost incentives Internet Service Providers overlays 

References

  1. 1.
    Liu, Y., Zhang, H., Gong, W., Towsley, D.: On the Interaction Between Overlay and Underlay Routing. In: IEEE INFOCOM 2005, Barcelona, Spain (April 2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Oechsner, S., Soursos, S., Papafili, I., Hoßfeld, T., Stamoulis, G.D., Stiller, B., Callejo, M.A., Staehle, D.: A framework of economic traffic management employing self-organization overlay mechanisms. In: Hummel, K.A., Sterbenz, J.P.G. (eds.) IWSOS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5343, pp. 84–96. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    SmoothIT Project (December 2010), http://www.smoothit.org
  4. 4.
    Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (ALTO) Requirements: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-alto-reqs-06 (work in progress) (October 2010)
  5. 5.
    Papafili, I., Stamoulis, G.D.: A Markov Model for the Evaluation of Cache Insertion on Peer-to-Peer Performance. In: EuroNF NGI Conference, Paris (June 2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lehrieder, F., Dán, G., Hoßfeld, T., Oechsner, S., Singeorzan, V.: The Impact of Caching on BitTorrent-like Peer-to-peer Systems. In: IEEE International Conference on Peer-to-Peer Computing P2P 2010, Delft, The Netherlands (August 2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bindal, R., Cao, P., Chan, W., Medval, J., Suwala, G., Bates, T., Zhang, A.: Improving Traffic Locality in BitTorrent via Biased Neighbor Selection. In: 26th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, Montreal, Canada (June 2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Oechsner, S., Lehrieder, F., Hoßfeld, T., Metzger, F., Pussep, K., Staehle, D.: Pushing the Performance of Biased Neighbor Selection through Biased Unchoking. In: 9th International Conference on Peer-to-Peer Computing (P2P’09), Seattle, USA (September 2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    The SmoothIT Project: Deliverable 2.3 — ETM Models and Components and Theoretical Foundations (Final) (October 2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Racz, P., Oechsner, S., Lehrieder, F.: BGP-based Locality Promotion for P2P Applications. In: 19th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN 2010), Zürich, Switzerland (August 2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lehrieder, F., Oechsner, S., Hoßfeld, T., Staehle, D., Despotovic, Z., Kellerer, W., Michel, M.: Mitigating Unfairness in Locality-Aware Peer-to-Peer Networks. International Journal of Network Management (IJNM), Special Issue on Economic Traffic Management (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hoßfeld, T., Lehrieder, F., Hock, D., Oechsner, S., Despotovic, Z., Kellerer, W., Michel, M.: Characterization of BitTorrent Swarms and their Distribution in the Internet, to appear in the Computer Networks (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cohen, B.: Incentives Built Robustness in BitTorrent. In: Kaashoek, M.F., Stoica, I. (eds.) IPTPS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2735, Springer, Heidelberg (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Papafili, I., Soursos, S., Stamoulis, G.D.: Improvement of BitTorrent Performance and Inter-domain Traffic by Inserting ISP-owned Peers. In: ICQT’09, Aachen, Germany (May 2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    SmoothIT Project: Deliverable 2.4 — Performance, Reliability, and Scalability Investigations of ETM Mechanisms (August 2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Papafili, I., Stamoulis, G.D., Lehrieder, F., Kleine, B., Oechsner, S.: Cache Capacity Allocation to Overlay Swarms. In: Bettstetter, C., Gershenson, C. (eds.) IWSOS 2011. LNCS, vol. 6557, Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pussep, K., Kuleshov, S., Groß, C., Soursos, S.: An Incentive-based Approach to Traffic Management for Peer-to-Peer Overlays. In: 3rd Workshop on Economic Traffic Management (ETM 2010), Amsterdam, The Netherlands (September 2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2011

Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ioanna Papafili
    • 1
  • George D. Stamoulis
    • 1
  • Rafal Stankiewicz
    • 2
  • Simon Oechsner
    • 3
  • Konstantin Pussep
    • 4
  • Robert Wojcik
    • 2
  • Jerzy Domzal
    • 2
  • Dirk Staehle
    • 3
  • Frank Lehrieder
    • 3
  • Burkhard Stiller
    • 5
  1. 1.Athens University of Economics and BusinessAthensGreece
  2. 2.AGH University of Science and TechnologyKrakowPoland
  3. 3.Julius-Maximilian Universität WürzburgWürzburgGermany
  4. 4.Technische Universität DarmstadtGermany
  5. 5.University of ZürichZürichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations