Advertisement

Evolution of Goal-Driven Pattern Families for Business Process Modeling

  • Saeed Ahmadi Behnam
  • Daniel Amyot
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 78)

Abstract

Using patterns is a well-known approach for increasing reusability. A pattern-based framework that lays down a foundation for capturing knowledge about business goals and processes and customizing it for specific organizations in a given domain is hence valuable. However, the problems and solutions within a domain are always changing. Consequently, such framework can be useful only if it can evolve over time. In this paper, we propose and formalize a mechanism for evolving a pattern-based framework for goal-driven business process models. We demonstrate its feasibility with an example from the patient safety domain that illustrates how to evolve a pattern family with our extension algorithm.

Keywords

business process models framework goal models healthcare patient safety pattern User Requirements Notation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alencar, F., Marín, B., Giachetti, G., Pastor, O., Castro, J., Pimentel, J.H.: From i* Requirements Models to Conceptual Models of a Model Driven Development Process. In: Persson, A., Stirna, J. (eds.) PoEM 2009. LNBIP, vol. 39, pp. 99–114. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berg, M.: Implementing information systems in health care organizations: myths and challenges. Int. J. of Med Info 64, 143–156 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ostadzadeh, S.S., Aliee, F.S., Ostadzadeh, S.A.: An MDA-Based Generic Framework to Address Various Aspects of Enterprise Architecture. In: Sobh, T. (ed.) Advances in Computer and Information Sciences and Eng., pp. 455–460 (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., Vlissides, J.: Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1995)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Čiukšys, D., Čaplinskas, A.: Ontology-based approach to reuse of business process knowledge. Informacijos Mokslai 42–43, 168–174 (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    URN Virtual Library, http://www.usecasemaps.org/urn/ (2010)
  7. 7.
    Behnam, S.A., Amyot, D., Mussbacher, G.: Towards a Pattern-Based Framework for Goal-Driven Business Process Modeling. In: 8th Int. Conf. on Software Eng. Research, Management and Applications (SERA 2010), pp. 137–145. IEEE CS, Los Alamitos (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    ITU-T – International Telecommunications Union: Recommendation Z.151 (11/08) User Requirements Notation (URN) – Language definition, Switzerland (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Weiss, M., Amyot, D.: Business process modeling with URN. Int. J. of E-Business Research 1, 63–90 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Amyot, D., Horkoff, J., Gross, D., Mussbacher, G.: A Lightweight GRL Profile for i* Modeling. In: Heuser, C.A., Pernul, G. (eds.) ER 2009. LNCS, vol. 5833, pp. 254–264. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M.: A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. Oxford University Press, US (1977)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hoffman, T.: Study: 85% of IT departments fail to meet biz needs. Computer World 11 (October 1999)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fowler, M.: Analysis Patterns: reusable object models. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Buschmann, F.: Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture: A System of Patterns. Wiley, Chichester (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mussbacher, G., Amyot, D., Weiss, M.: Formalizing Patterns with the User Requirements Notation. Design Pattern Formalization Techniques, IGI Global, 302–322 (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Behnam, S.A., Amyot, D., Forster, A.J., Peyton, L., Shamsaei, A.: Goal-Driven Development of a Patient Surveillance Application for Improving Patient Safety. In: Babin, G., Kropf, P., Weiss, M. (eds.) MCETECH 2009. LNBIP, vol. 26, pp. 65–76. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Iida, H.: Pattern-Oriented Approach to Software Process Evolution. In: Int. Workshop on the Principles of Software Evolution, pp. 55–59 (1999)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tran, H.: Modélisation de Procédés Logiciels à Base de Patrons Réutilisables. Thése de doctorat, Université de Toulouse-le-Mirail, France (November 2007)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lapouchnian, A., Yu, Y., Mylopoulos, J.: Requirements-Driven Design and Configuration Management of Business Processes. In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, pp. 246–261. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhao, C., Kong, J., Dong, J., Zhang, K.: Pattern-based design evolution using graph transformation. J. of Visual Languages and Computing 18, 378–398 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhao, C., Kong, J., Zhang, K.: Design pattern evolution and verification using graph transformation. In: 40th Annual HICSS, p. 290a. IEEE CS, Los Alamitos (2007)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dong, J., Zhao, Y., Sun, Y.: Design pattern evolutions in QVT. Software Quality Journal 18, 269–297 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pourshahid, A., Chen, P., Amyot, D., Forster, A.J., Ghanavati, S., Peyton, L., Weiss, M.: Business Process Management with the User Requirements Notation. Electronic Commerce Research 9(4), 269–316 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kuziemsky, C., Liu, X., Peyton, L.: Leveraging Goal Models and Performance Indicators to Assess Health Care Information Systems. In: QUATIC 2010, pp. 222–227. IEEE CS, Los Alamitos (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Saeed Ahmadi Behnam
    • 1
  • Daniel Amyot
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Information Technology and EngineeringUniversity of OttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations