Making “Google Docs” User Interface More Accessible for Blind People

  • Giulio Mori
  • Maria Claudia Buzzi
  • Marina Buzzi
  • Barbara Leporini
  • Victor M. R. Penichet
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6616)


Groupware systems are increasingly embedded in our everyday life, both at the office and at home. Thus groupware systems should offer easy interaction for all, including the differently-abled. In this paper we describe the design and implementation of a modified version of Google Docs ( ) interfaces for collaborative editing of documents. Although consisting of only a few Web pages (login, document list, text editing) this modified version shows how it would be possible to enhance interaction via screen reader and voice synthesizer with this popular groupware system, while maintaining its appealing “look&feel”.


Accessibility usability groupware collaborative editing screen reader blind 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Baker, K., Greenberg, S.: Empirical Development of a Heuristic Evaluation Methodology for Shared Workspace Groupware (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Buzzi, M.C., Buzzi, M., Leporini, B., Mori, G., Penichet, V.M.R.: Accessing Google Docs via Screen Reader. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W., Karshmer, A. (eds.) ICCHP 2010. LNCS, vol. 6179, pp. 92–99. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Card, S.K., Moran, T.P., Newell, A.: The Psychology of Human-computer Interaction, pp. 29–97. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London (1983)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    ISO 9241-11. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) - Part 11: Guidance on usability (1998) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Khan, M.A., Israr, N., Hassan, S.: Usability Evaluation of Web Office Applications in Collaborative Writing. In: 2010 International Conference on Intelligent Systems, Modelling and Simulation, Liverpool, United Kingdom, January 27-January 29, pp. 147–151 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kobayashi, M.: Voice Browser for Groupware Systems: VoBG - A Simple Groupware Client for Visually Impaired Students. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W.L., Karshmer, A.I. (eds.) ICCHP 2008. LNCS, vol. 5105, pp. 777–780. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Leporini, B., Andronico, P., Buzzi, M., Castillo, C.: Evaluating a modified Google user interface via screen reader. In: Universal Access in the Information Society, (7/1-2). Springer, Heidelberg (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leporini, B., Paternò, F.: Applying web usability criteria for vision-impaired users: does it really improve task performance? International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction (IJHCI) 24, 17–47 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nielsen, J.: Usability engineering. Morgan Kaufmann, San Diego (1993)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ramakrishnan, R., Goldschmidt, B., Leibl, R., Holschuh, J.: Heuristics for usability assessment for groupware tools in an information management setting (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schoeberlein, J.G., Yuanqiong, W.: Groupware Accessibility for Persons with Disabilities. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) UAHCI 2009. LNCS, vol. 5616, pp. 404–413. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Takagi, H., Asakawa, C., Fukuda, K., Maeda, J.: Accessibility designer: visualizing usability for the blind. In: 6th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, pp. 177–184 (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Takagi, H., Asakawa, C., Itoh, T.: Non-Visual Groupware Client: Notes Reader. In: Proceedings of Center on Disability Technology and Persons with Disabilities Conference. California State University, Berkeley (2000)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thiessen, P., Chen, C.: Ajax Live Regions: Chat as a Case Example. In: Proceedings of the 2007 International World Wide Web Conference, W4A (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    W3C. WAI-ARIA Best Practices. W3C Working Draft, February 4 (2008),
  16. 16.
    W3C. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0, December 5 (2008),
  17. 17.
    Illinois Center for Information Technology and Web Accessibility. ARIA Examples,
  18. 18.
    TinyMCE - Javascript WYSIWYG Editor,
  19. 19.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giulio Mori
    • 1
  • Maria Claudia Buzzi
    • 1
  • Marina Buzzi
    • 1
  • Barbara Leporini
    • 2
  • Victor M. R. Penichet
    • 3
  1. 1.CNR-IITPisaItaly
  2. 2.CNR-ISTIPisaItaly
  3. 3.Computer Systems DepartmentUniversity of Castilla-La ManchaAlbaceteSpain

Personalised recommendations