Efficient Algorithms for Distributed Detection of Holes and Boundaries in Wireless Networks

  • Dennis Schieferdecker
  • Markus Völker
  • Dorothea Wagner
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6630)


We propose two novel algorithms for distributed and location-free boundary recognition in wireless sensor networks. Both approaches enable a node to decide autonomously whether it is a boundary node, based solely on connectivity information of a small neighborhood. This makes our algorithms highly applicable for dynamic networks where nodes can move or become inoperative.

We compare our algorithms qualitatively and quantitatively with several previous approaches. In extensive simulations, we consider various models and scenarios. Although our algorithms use less information than most other approaches, they produce significantly better results. They are very robust against variations in node degree and do not rely on simplified assumptions of the communication model. Moreover, they are much easier to implement on real sensor nodes than most existing approaches.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bi, K., Tu, K., Gu, N., Dong, W.L., Liu, X.: Topological hole detection in sensor networks with cooperative neighbors. In: International Conference on Systems and Networks Communication (ICSNC 2006), pp. 31–35 (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Silva, V., Ghrist, R.: Coordinate-free coverage in sensor networks with controlled boundaries via homology. International Journal of Robotics Research 25(12), 1205–1222 (2006)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Deogun, J.S., Das, S., Hamza, H.S., Goddard, S.: An algorithm for boundary discovery in wireless sensor networks. In: Bader, D.A., Parashar, M., Sridhar, V., Prasanna, V.K. (eds.) HiPC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3769, pp. 343–352. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dong, D., Liu, Y., Liao, X.: Fine-grained boundary recognition in wireless ad hoc and sensor networks by topological methods. In: MobiHoc 2009: Proceedings of the Tenth ACM International Symposium on Mobile ad Hoc Networking and Computing, pp. 135–144. ACM, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fang, Q., Gao, J., Guibas, L.J.: Locating and bypassing routing holes in sensor networks. In: INFOCOM 2004. Twenty-third Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fekete, S.P., Kaufmann, M., Kröller, A., Lehmann, N.: A new approach for boundary recognition in geometric sensor networks. In: Proceedings 17th Canadian Conference on Computational Geometry, pp. 82–85 (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fekete, S.P., Kröller, A., Pfisterer, D., Fischer, S., Buschmann, C.: Neighborhood-based topology recognition in sensor networks. In: Nikoletseas, S.E., Rolim, J.D.P. (eds.) ALGOSENSORS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3121, pp. 123–136. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Funke, S.: Topological hole detection in wireless sensor networks and its applications. In: DIALM-POMC 2005: Proceedings of the 2005 Joint Workshop on Foundations of Mobile Computing, pp. 44–53. ACM, USA (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Funke, S., Klein, C.: Hole detection or: how much geometry hides in connectivity? In: SCG 2006: Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry, pp. 377–385. ACM, USA (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ghrist, R., Muhammad, A.: Coverage and hole-detection in sensor networks via homology. In: IPSN 2005: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, pp. 254–260. IEEE Press, USA (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kröller, A., Fekete, S.P., Pfisterer, D., Fischer, S.: Deterministic boundary recognition and topology extraction for large sensor networks. In: 17th Annual ACM–SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA 2006), pp. 1000–1009 (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Martincic, F., Schwiebert, L.: Distributed perimeter detection in wireless sensor networks. Tech. Rep. WSU-CSC-NEWS/03-TR03, Wayne State University (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Saukh, O., Sauter, R., Gauger, M., Marrón, P.J.: On boundary recognition without location information in wireless sensor networks. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (TOSN) 6(3), 1–35 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schieferdecker, D., Völker, M., Wagner, D.: Efficient algorithms for distributed detection of holes and boundaries in wireless networks. Tech. Rep. 2011-08, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Torgerson, W.S.: Multidimensional Scaling: I. Theory and Method. Psychometrika 17(4), 401–419 (1952)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang, Y., Gao, J., Mitchell, J.S.: Boundary recognition in sensor networks by topological methods. In: MobiCom 2006: 12th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, pp. 122–133. ACM, USA (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dennis Schieferdecker
    • 1
  • Markus Völker
    • 1
  • Dorothea Wagner
    • 1
  1. 1.Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)Germany

Personalised recommendations