Advertisement

Temporal Specification of Business Processes through Project Planning Tools

  • Camilo Flores
  • Marcos Sepúlveda
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 66)

Abstract

Business Process Management has gained importance within organizations due to the need to streamline their operations. Nevertheless, despite the existence of process modeling standards such as BPMN, nowadays it is difficult to specify complex temporal constraints and relationships among tasks of a given process, which prevents the specification and subsequent automation of processes where these restrictions are relevant. To solve the exposed difficulty, we have resorted to the project planning and management field, developing a BPMN equivalency of all temporal constraints and relationships that can be specified in a standard project planning tool: Microsoft Project. This not only enables a simple interface for specifying complex temporal restrictions in business processes, but also defines an execution semantic for the models developed in the field of project planning, allowing their later automation through process execution engines.

Keywords

Process design methods and methodologies Process design tools Notations and methods BPMN Project planning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Weske, M.: Business process management: A survey. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Weske, M. (eds.) BPM 2003. LNCS, vol. 2678, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gagné, D., Trudel, A.: Time-BPMN. In: Proceedings of 1st International Workshop on BPMN (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wilson, J.: Gantt charts: A centenary appreciation. European Journal of Operational Research 149(2), 430–437 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Object Management Group: Business Process Modeling Notation Beta 1 for Version 2.0, http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0/
  5. 5.
    Gagné, D., Trudel, A.: The Temporal Perspective: Expressing Temporal Constraints and Dependencies. In: Process Models in BPM and Workflow Handbook (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cheng, J., Law, K.H.: Using Process Specification Language for Project Information. In: 3rd International Conference on Concurrent Engineering in Construction, Berkeley, CA, pp. 63–74 (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    BPMI.org, OMG: Business Process Modeling Notation Specification, Final Adopted Specification. Object Management Group (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eder, J., Paganos, E.: Managing Time in Workflow Systems. In: Fischer, L. (ed.) Workflow Handbook 2001, Future Strategies Inc. (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Peltz, C.: Web Services Orchestration and Choreography. IEEE Computer 36 (2003) Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Recker, J., Mendling, J.: On the Translation between BPMN and BPEL:Conceptual Mismatch between Process Modeling Languages. In: Proceedings of Workshops and Doctoral Consortium for the 18th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ouyang, C., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: From BPMN process models to BPEL Web services. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Web Services (ICWS 2006), pp. 285–292 (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Microsoft Corp. MS Project Developer documentation, http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb251741%28v=office.12%29.aspx

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Camilo Flores
    • 1
  • Marcos Sepúlveda
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Science Department, School of EngineeringPontificia Universidad Católica de ChileMaculChile

Personalised recommendations