Stitching an Organisation’s Knowledge Together–Communities of Practice as Facilitator for Innovations Inside an Affiliated Group

  • M. A. Weissenberger
  • Dominik Ebert
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 9)

Abstract

A major challenge for innovation inside an affiliated group, such as the Robert Bosch GmbH (Bosch), is to enable an effective knowledge exchange between its subsidiaries. One of the driving forces in Bosch’s internal knowledge transfer is communities of practice (CoP). During the last fifteen years the company has established these experience exchange groups around its most important technical topic areas. By conducting a qualitative study we wanted to find out how these groups influence the handling of knowledge. In addition to the expected results on the identification and the transfer of knowledge, we also discovered that communities of practice advance innovation in an indirect way. Bosch files 15 patents per working day. To establish an evidence, whether communities of pra tice contribute to this knowledge creation, we conducted a second study. Within the study, we analysed the relationship between inventions and communities of practice quantitatively and found a significant correlation.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bortz, J., Lienert, G.A., Boehnke, K.: Verteilungsfreie Methoden in der Biostatistik. Springer, Berlin (2008)Google Scholar
  2. Brown, J.S., Duguid, P.: Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Towards a Unified View of Working, Learning and Innovation. Organ. Sci. 2(1), 40–57 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D.A.: Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Adm. Sci. Q 35(1), 128–152 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Daft, R.L., Lengel, R.H., Trevino, L.K.: Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems. MIS. Q 11(3), 354–366 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kendall, M.G.: A new measure of rank correlation. Biom. 30(1-2), 81–93 (1938)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Lave, J., Wenger, E.: Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991)Google Scholar
  7. Liebowitz, J.: Think of others in knowledge management: making culture work for you. Knowl. Manag. Res. Pract. 6(1), 47–51 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. McDermott, R., Archibald, D.: Harnessing Your Staff’s Informal Networks. Harv. Bus. Rev. 88(3), 82–89 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. Oliver, S., Kandadi, K.R.: How to develop knowledge culture in organizations? A multiple case study of large distributed organizations. J. Knowl. Manag. 10(4), 6–24 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Sollberger, B.A.: Wissenskultur. Erfolgsfaktor für ein ganzheitliches Wissensmanagement. Haupt Verlag, Bern (2006)Google Scholar
  11. Weissenberger-Eibl, M.A.: Wissensmanagement in Netzwerken für Klein- und Mittelbetriebe. In: Ciesinger, K.-G., Holwaldt, J., Klatt, R., Kopp, R. (eds.) Modernes Wissensmanagement in Netzwerken, Perspektiven, Trends und Szenarien, DUV, Wiesbaden (2005)Google Scholar
  12. Weissenberger-Eibl, M.A.: Wissensmanagement in Unternehmensnetzwerken. Konzepte, Instrumente, Erfolgsmuster. Cactus Group Verlag, Kassel (2006)Google Scholar
  13. Weissenberger-Eibl, M.A., Ebert, D.: Die kritische Rolle des Community-of-Practice-Sprechers. Wissensmanagement 12(5), 24–26 (2010)Google Scholar
  14. Wenger, E.: Communities of practice. Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)Google Scholar
  15. Wenger, E., McDermott, R., Snyder, W.: Cultivating communities of practice. A guide to managing knowledge. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. A. Weissenberger
    • 1
  • Dominik Ebert
    • 2
  1. 1.Chair for Innovation and Technology ManagementUniversity of KasselGermany
  2. 2.Robert Bosch GmbHStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations