Amaranths were a fundamental crop of pre-Columbian times and currently are an attractive alternative for crop production in dry and semi-dry areas where major crops perform poorly. To be competitive, amaranth cultivars should be improved on traits where other crops have made significant gains. Some of these traits may be found today or may be selected in the future in their very successful relatives, the Amaranthus weeds. This chapter attempts to present the research conducted on amaranth weeds in a way thought useful for amaranth breeders. Emphasis is placed on gene flow research as an important aspect when considering the availability of interspecific gene pools. We discuss the use and findings with early molecular marker technologies, and we explore the possibilities presented by the increasing genomic resources being generated with both domesticated and non-domesticated Amaranthus species. Also, a brief section is included discussing the evolution of herbicide resistance in Amaranthus weeds, and its potential relevance to the domesticated species.


  1. Baltensperger DD, Weber LE, Nelson LA (1992) Registration of ‘Plainsman’ grain amaranth. Crop Sci 32:1510–1511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Basu C, Halfhill MD, Mueller TC, Stewart NC (2004) Weed genomics: new tools to understand weed biology. Trends Plant Sci 9:391–398PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bejosano FP, Corke H (1998) Protein quality evaluation of Amaranthus wholemeal flours and protein concentrates. J Sci Food Agric 76:100–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brenner DM, Widrlechner MP (1998) Amaranthus seed regeneration in plastic tents in greenhouses. FAO Plant Genet Resour Newsl 116:1–4Google Scholar
  5. Brenner DM, Baltensperger DD, Kulakow PA, Lehmann JW, Myers RL, Slabbert MM, Sleugh BB (2000) Genetic resources and breeding in Amaranthus. In: Janick J (ed) Plant breeding reviews, vol 19. Wiley, New York, USA, pp 227–285Google Scholar
  6. Budin JT, Breene WM, Putnam DH (1996) Some compositional properties of seeds and oils of eight Amaranthus species. J Am Chem Soc 73:475–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chan KF, Sun M (1997) Genetic diversity and relationships detected by isozyme and RAPD analysis of crop and wild species of Amaranthus. Theor Appl Genet 95:865–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Costea M, Tardif FJ (2003) Conspectus and notes on the genus Amaranthus (Amaranthaceae) in Canada. Rhodora 105:260–281Google Scholar
  9. Culpepper AS, Grey TL, Vencill WK, Kichler JM, Webster TM, Brown SM, York AC, Davis JW, Hanna WW (2006) Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) confirmed in Georgia. Weed Sci 54:620–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Culpepper AS, Whitaker JR, MacRae AW, York AC (2008) Distribution of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Georgia and North Carolina during 2005–2006. J Cotton Sci 12:306–310Google Scholar
  11. Grant WF (1959) Cytogenetic studies in AmaranthusIII. Chromosome numbers and phylogenetic aspects. Can J Genet Cytol 1:313–328Google Scholar
  12. Greizerstein EJ, Poggio L (1995) Meiotic studies of spontaneous hybrids of Amaranthus: genome analysis. Plant Breed 114:448–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grubben GJ, van Sloten DH (1981) Genetic resources of amaranths: a global plan of action. International Board of Plant Genetic Resources, Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  14. Hauptli H, Jain S (1984) Genetic structure of landrace populations of the New World amaranths. Euphytica 33:875–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heap I (2010) The international survey of herbicide resistant weeds. Accessed 29 June 2010
  16. Holm LG, Plucknett DL, Pancho JV, Herberger JP (1991) The world’s worst weeds: distribution and biology. Krieger, Malabar, FL, USAGoogle Scholar
  17. Holm L, Doll J, Holm E, Pancho J, Herberger J (1997) World weeds: natural histories and distribution. Wiley, New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  18. Jofre-Garfias AE, Villegas-Sepúlveda N, Cabrera-Ponce JL, Adame-Alvarez RM, Herrera-Estrella L, Simpson J (1997) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Amaranthus hypochondriacus: light- and tissue-specific expression of a pea chlorophyll a/b-binding protein promoter. Plant Cell Rep 16:847–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kauffman CS (1992) Realizing the potential of grain amaranth. Food Rev Int 8:5–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Khoshoo TN, Pal M (1972) Cytogenetic patterns in Amaranthus. Chrom Today 3:259–267Google Scholar
  21. Kirkpatrick BA (1995) Interspecies relationships within the genus Amaranthus (Amaranthaceae). PhD Dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USAGoogle Scholar
  22. Lanoue KZ, Wolf PG, Browning S, Hood EE (1996) Phylogenetic analysis of restriction site variation in wild and cultivated Amaranthus species (Amaranthaceae). Theor Appl Genet 93:722–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee JR, Hong GY, Dixit A, Chung JW, Ma KH, Lee JH, Kang HK, Cho YH, Gwag JG, Park YJ (2008) Characterization of microsatellite loci developed for Amaranthus hypochondriacus and their cross-amplifications in wild species. Conserv Genet 9:243–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee RM, Thimmapuram J, Thinglum KA, Gong G, Hernandez AG, Wright CL, Kim RW, Mikel MA, Tranel PJ (2009) Sampling the waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) genome using pyrosequencing technology. Weed Sci 57:463–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Legleiter TR, Bradley KW (2008) Glyphosate and multiple herbicide resistance in waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) populations from Missouri. Weed Sci 56:582–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lehmann JW, Clark RL, Frey KJ (1991) Biomass heterosis and combining ability in interspecific and intraspecific matings of grain amaranths. Crop Sci 31:1111–1116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mallory MA, Hall RV, Mcnabb AR, Pratt DB, Jellen EN, Maughan PJ (2008) Development and characterization of microsatellite markers for the grain amaranths. Crop Sci 48:1098–1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maughan PJ, Sisneros N, Luo M, Kudrna D, Ammiraju JSS, Wing RA (2008) Construction of an Amaranthus hypochondriacus bacterial artificial chromosome library and genomic sequencing of herbicide target genes. Crop Sci 48:S85–S94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mosyakin SL, Robertson KR (2003) Amaranthus. In: Flora of North America. North of Mexico. Oxford University Press, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  30. Murray MJ (1940) The genetics of sex determination in the family Amaranthaceae. Genetics 25:409–431PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Norsworthy JK, Griffith GM, Scott RC, Smith KL, Oliver LR (2008) Confirmation and control of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Arkansas. Weed Technol 22:108–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pal M, Khoshoo TN (1972) Evolution and improvement of cultivated amaranths. V. Inviability, weakness, and sterility in hybrids. J Hered 73:467Google Scholar
  33. Pal M, Khoshoo TN (1973) Evolution and improvement of cultivated amaranths VII. Cytogenetic relationships in vegetable amaranths. Theor Appl Genet 43:343–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pal M, Pandey RM, Khoshoo TN (1982) Evolution and improvement of cultivated amaranths. J Hered 73:353–356Google Scholar
  35. Paredes-López O (1994) Amaranth: biology, chemistry, and technology. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, USAGoogle Scholar
  36. Patzoldt WL, Tranel PJ, Hager AG (2005) A waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) biotype with multiple resistance across three herbicide sites of action. Weed Sci 53:30–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Patzoldt WL, Hager AG, McCormic JS, Tranel PJ (2006) A codon deletion confers resistance to herbicides inhibiting protoporphyrinogen oxidase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:12329–12334PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pratt DB, Clark LG (2001) Amaranthus rudis and A. tuberculatus – one species or two? J Torr Bot Soc 128:282–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ranade SA, Kumar A, Goswami M, Farooqui N, Sane PV (1997) Genome analysis of amaranths: determination of inter- and intra-species variations. J Biosci 22:457–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sauer JD (1957) Recent migration and evolution of the dioecious amaranths. Evolution 11:11–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sauer JD (1967) The grain amaranths and their relatives: a revised taxonomic and geographic survey. Ann MO Bot Gard 54:102–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sauer JD (1972) The dioecious amaranths: a new species name and major range extensions. Madroño 21:425–434Google Scholar
  43. Steckel LE (2007) The dioecious Amaranthus spp.: here to stay. Weed Technol 21:567–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tranel PJ, Trucco F (2009) 21st century weed science: a call for Amaranthus genomics. In: Stewart CN Jr (ed) Weedy and invasive plant genomics. Blackwell, Ames, IA, USA, pp 53–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tranel PJ, Wassom JJ, Jeschke MR, Rayburn AL (2002) Transmission of herbicide resistance from a monoecious to a dioecious weedy Amaranthus species. Theor Appl Genet 105:674–679PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Transue DK, Fairbanks DJ, Robison LR, Andersen WR (1994) Species identification by RAPD analysis of grain amaranth genetic resources. Crop Sci 34:1385–1389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Trucco F, Jeschke MR, Rayburn AL, Tranel PJ (2005a) Amaranthus hybridus can be pollinated frequently by A. tuberculatus under field conditions. Heredity 94:64–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Trucco F, Jeschke MR, Rayburn AL, Tranel PJ (2005b) Promiscuity in weedy amaranths: high frequency of female tall waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) x smooth pigweed (A. hybridus) hybridization under field conditions. Weed Sci 53:46–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Trucco F, Tatum T, Rayburn AL, Tranel PJ (2005c) Fertility, segregation at a herbicide resistance locus, and genome structure in BC1 hybrids between two important weedy Amaranthus species. Mol Ecol 14:2717–2728PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Trucco F, Hager AG, Tranel PJ (2006a) Acetolactate synthase mutation conferring imidazolinone-specific herbicide resistance in Amaranthus hybridus. J Plant Physiol 163:475–479PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Trucco F, Tatum T, Robertson KR, Rayburn AL, Tranel PJ (2006b) Morphological, reproductive, and cytogenetic characterization of Amaranthus tuberculatus × A. hybridus F1 hybrids. Weed Technol 20:14–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Trucco F, Tatum T, Rayburn AL, Tranel PJ (2009) Out of the swamp: Unidirectional hybridization with weedy species may explain Amaranthus tuberculatus’ prevalence as a weed. New Phytol 184:819–827PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tucker JM, Sauer JD (1958) Aberrant Amaranthus populations of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California. Madroño 14:252–261Google Scholar
  54. Uriyapongson J, Rayas-Duarte P (1994) Comparison of yield and properties of amaranth starches using wet and dry-wet milling processes. Cereal Chem 71:571–577Google Scholar
  55. Wassom JJ, Tranel PJ (2005) Amplified fragment length polymorphism-based genetic relationships among weedy Amaranthus species. J Hered 96:410–416PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wetzel DK, Horak MJ, Skinner DZ (1999) Use of PCR-based molecular markers to identify weedy Amaranthus species. Weed Sci 47:518–523Google Scholar
  57. Zheleznov AV, Solonenko LP, Zheleznova NB (1997) Seed protein of the wild and cultivated Amaranthus species. Euphytica 97:177–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto de Agrobiotecnología RosarioRosarioArgentina
  2. 2.Department of Crop SciencesUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations