Election Inversions by the U.S. Electoral College
An election inversion occurs when the candidate (or party) that wins the most votes from an electorate fails to win the most electoral votes (or parliamentary seats) and therefore loses the election. Public commentary commonly uses terms such as “reversal of winners,” “wrong winner,” “divided verdict,” and “misfire” to describe this phenomenon; the academic social choice literature adds such terms as “repre- sentative inconsistency,” “compound majority paradox,” “referendum paradox,” and “majority deficit.” Election inversions can occur under any two-tier electoral system, including the U.S. Electoral College. As is well known, the Electoral College actually produced a “wrong winner” in the 2000 Presidential election, and it has done so twice before.
KeywordsPresidential Election Distribution Effect Electoral College Electoral Vote Popular Vote
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Abbott and Levine(1991).Abbott, D.W., & Levine, J.P. (1991). Wrong winner: the coming debacle in the electoral college. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
- Balinski and Young(1982).Balinski, M.L., and Young, H.P. (1982). Fair representation: meeting the ideal of one man, one vote. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Ball and Leuthold(1991).
- Best(1971).Best, J. (1971). The case against direct election of the president. Ithica: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Burnham(2010).Burnham, W.D. (2010). Voting in American elections. Bethesda: Academica Press.Google Scholar
- Butler(1951).Butler, D.E. (1951). Appendix: An examination of the results. In H. G. Nichols (Ed.), The British general election of 1950. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Congressional(2005).Congressional Quarterly (2005). Guide to U.S. elections. CQ Press.Google Scholar
- Diamond(1992).Diamond, M. (1992). The electoral college and the American idea of democracy. In W. Berns (Ed.), After the people vote: a guide to the Electoral College. Washington, DC: AEI.Google Scholar
- Edwards(2004).Edwards, G.C., III (2004). Why the Electoral College is bad for America. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Felsenthal and Machover(1998).Felsenthal, D.S., & Machover, M. (1998). The measurement of voting power: theory and practice, problems and paradoxes. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Feix et al.(2004)Feix, M.R., Lepelly, D., Merlin, V.R., & Rouet, J.L. (2004). The probability of conflicts in a U.S. Presidential type Elections. Economic Theory, 23, 227–257.Google Scholar
- Fite(1911).Fite, E.D. (1911). The Presidential campaign of 1860. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Garand and Parent(1991).Garand, J.C., & Parent, T.W. (1991). Representation, swing, and bias in U.S. Presidential elections, 1872–1988. American Journal of Political Science, 35, 1011–1031.Google Scholar
- Key(1949).Key, V.O., Jr (1949). Southern politics in state and nation. Random House: New York.Google Scholar
- Laffond and Laine(2000).Laffond, G., & Laine, J. (2000). Representation in majority tournaments.Mathematical Social Sciences, 39, 35–53.Google Scholar
- Lahrach and Merlin(2010).Lahrach, R., & Merlin, V.R. (2010). Assessing the probability of the referendum paradox: the French local election case.Google Scholar
- Longley and Peirce(1996).Longley, L.D., & Peirce, N.R. (1996). The Electoral College Primer. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Niemi and Fett(1947).
- Neubauer and Zeitlin(2003).Neubauer, M.G., & Zeitlin, J. (2003). Outcomes of Presidential elections and House size. PS: Politics and Political Science, 36, 221–224.Google Scholar
- Nurmi(1999).Nurmi, H. (1999). Election paradoxes and how to deal with them. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Nurmi(2001).Nurmi, H. (2001). Referendum paradox in the U.S. Presidential elections. Prepared for presentation at the First General Conference of ECPR, Canterbury.Google Scholar
- Nurmi(2002).Nurmi, H. (2002). Voting procedures under uncertainty. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Peirce and Longley(1981).Peirce, N., & Longley, L.D. (1981). The people’s President: The Electoral College in American history and the direct vote alternative, rev. ed. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Ross(2004).Ross, T. (2004). Enlightened democracy: the case for the Electoral College. Dallas: Colonial Press.Google Scholar
- Schattschneider(1942).Schattschneider, E.E. (1942). Party government. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar