Advertisement

Specifications for Free

  • Andreas Zeller
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6617)

Abstract

Recent advances in software validation and verification make it possible to widely automate the check whether a specification is satisfied. This progress is hampered, though, by the persistent difficulty of writing specifications. Are we facing a “specification crisis”? By mining specifications from existing systems, we can alleviate this burden, reusing and extending the knowledge of 60 years of programming, and bridging the gap between formal methods and real-world software. In this NFM 2011 invited keynote, I present the state of the art in specification mining, its challenges, and its potential, up to a vision of seamless integration of specification and programming.

Keywords

Model Check Symbolic Execution Test Case Generation Seamless Integration Dynamic Invariant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ammons, G., Bodík, R., Larus, J.R.: Mining specifications. In: Proc. POPL 2002, pp. 4–16. ACM, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Burdy, L., Cheon, Y., Cok, D.R., Ernst, M.D., Kiniry, J.R., Leavens, G.T., Leino, K.R.M., Poll, E.: An overview of JML tools and applications. STTT 7(3), 212–232 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clarke, E., Grumberg, O., Jha, S., Lu, Y., Veith, H.: Counterexample-guided abstraction refinement for symbolic model checking. J. ACM 50, 752–794 (2003)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Csallner, C., Tillmann, N., Smaragdakis, Y.: DySy: dynamic symbolic execution for invariant inference. In: Proc. ICSE 2008, pp. 281–290. ACM, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dallmeier, V., Knopp, N., Mallon, C., Hack, S., Zeller, A.: Generating test cases for specification mining. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis, ISSTA 2010, pp. 85–96. ACM, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ernst, M.D., Cockrell, J., Griswold, W.G., Notkin, D.: Dynamically discovering likely program invariants to support program evolution. IEEE TSE 27(2), 99–123 (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Flanagan, C., Leino, K.R.M.: Houdini, an Annotation Assistant for ESC/Java. In: Oliveira, J.N., Zave, P. (eds.) FME 2001. LNCS, vol. 2021, pp. 500–517. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ghezzi, C., Mocci, A., Monga, M.: Synthesizing intensional behavior models by graph transformation. In: Proc. ICSE 2009, pp. 430–440. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Godefroid, P., Klarlund, N., Sen, K.: DART: directed automated random testing. In: Proc. PLDI 2005, pp. 213–223. ACM, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Henkel, J., Diwan, A.: Discovering algebraic specifications from Java classes. In: Cardelli, L. (ed.) ECOOP 2003. LNCS, vol. 2743, pp. 431–456. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McMinn, P.: Search-based software test data generation: a survey. Software Testing, Verification & Reliability 14(2), 105–156 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pacheco, C., Ernst, M.D.: Eclat: Automatic generation and classification of test inputs. In: Gao, X.-X. (ed.) ECOOP 2005. LNCS, vol. 3586, pp. 504–527. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pacheco, C., Lahiri, S.K., Ernst, M.D., Ball, T.: Feedback-directed random test generation. In: Proc. ICSE 2007, pp. 75–84. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Polikarpova, N., Ciupa, I., Meyer, B.: A comparative study of programmer-written and automatically inferred contracts. In: Proc. ISSTA 2009, pp. 93–104. ACM, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shoham, S., Yahav, E., Fink, S., Pistoia, M.: Static specification mining using automata-based abstractions. In: Proc. ISSTA 2007, pp. 174–184. ACM, New York (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas Zeller
    • 1
  1. 1.Saarland UniversitySaarbrückenGermany

Personalised recommendations