The Impact of Individual Differences on E-Learning System Behavioral Intention

  • PeiWen Liao
  • Chien Yu
  • ChinCheh Yi
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 143)

Abstract

This study investigated the impact of contingent variables on the relationship between four predictors and employees’ behavioral intention with e-learning. Seven hundred and twenty-two employees in online training and education were asked to answer questionnaires about their learning styles, perceptions of the quality of the proposed predictors and behavioral intention with e-learning systems. The results of analysis showed that three contingent variables, gender, job title and industry, significantly influenced the perceptions of predictors and employees’ behavioral intention with the e-learning system. This study also found a statistically significant moderating effect of two contingent variables, gender, job title and industry, on the relationship between predictors and e-learning system behavioral intention. The results suggest that a serious consideration of contingent variables is crucial for improving e-learning system behavioral intention. The implications of these results for the management of e-learning systems are discussed.

Keywords

e-learning system behavioral intention quality perceptions 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lu, H.P., Chiou, M.J.: The impact of individual differences on e-learning system satisfaction: A contingency approach. British Journal of Educational Technology 41(2), 307–323 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    DeLone, W.D., McLean, E.R.: Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research 3, 60–95 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    DeLone, W.D., McLean, E.R.: The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems 19, 9–30 (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang, Y.S.: Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems. Information & Management 41, 75–86 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Garland, D., Martin, B.N.: Do gender and learning style play a role in how online courses should be designed? Journal of Interactive Online Learning 4, 67–81 (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ong, C.S., Lai, J.Y.: Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior 22, 816–829 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee, Y.K.: Understanding e-learning consumers: the moderating effects of gender and learner diversity. The Journal of American Academy of Business 11, 223–230 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bagozzi, R.P., Yi, Y.: On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marking Science 16, 74–94 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McDonald, R.P., Ho, M.R.: Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analysis. Psychological Methods 7, 64–82 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • PeiWen Liao
    • 1
    • 2
  • Chien Yu
    • 1
  • ChinCheh Yi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Applied Technology and Human Resource DevelopmentNational Taiwan Normal UniversityR.O.C.
  2. 2.National Taiwan Normal UniversityTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations