The Impact of EU Law and Globalization on Consular Assistance and Diplomatic Protection



This chapter deals with the impact of both Europeanization and globalization on some specific aspects of what was once called “international administrative law”, namely consular assistance and diplomatic protection. First of all, the international conventions on consular assistance and diplomatic protection are briefly summarized. Second, the impact of Europeanization is evaluated, taking into account both the horizontal (the right to consular and diplomatic protection from authorities of member states other than those of citizenship) and the vertical dimension (the right to consular and diplomatic protection from European authorities). Finally, the impact of globalization is considered. It is argued in this respect that the changes observed in these specific sectors could exemplify some more general phenomena. On the one hand, globalization increases the international dimension of domestic administrative law, by widening the part of domestic administrative law that regulates situations having a link with foreign legal systems. On the other hand, globalization decreases the degree of specificity of that part of domestic law, submitting the exercise of “foreign affairs” administrative functions to the general requirements of the rule of law.


  1. Attanasio M, Malara C, Nicolosi SF (2009) Il Judicial Review del rifiuto statale di agire in protezione diplomatica. In: La protezione diplomatica: sviluppi e prospettive, Giappichelli, TorinoGoogle Scholar
  2. Battini S (2003) Amministrazioni senza Stato. Giuffré, MilanGoogle Scholar
  3. Borchard EM (1913) Basic elements of diplomatic protection of citizens abroad. Am J Int Law 7: 497 ff.Google Scholar
  4. Borsi U (1912) Carattere ed oggetto del diritto amministrativo internazionale. Rivista di diritto internazionale 1912:384 ff.Google Scholar
  5. Cassese S (1997) Stato nazione e funzione pubblica. Giornale di diritto amministrativo 3:88 ff.Google Scholar
  6. Cerulli Irelli V (2009) Politica e amministrazione tra atti “politici” e atti “di alta amministrazione”. Diritto pubblico 14:101 ff.Google Scholar
  7. Cossalter P (2010) Preface. In: Cassese S (ed) Au-delà de l’État. Bruylant, BruxellesGoogle Scholar
  8. Dugard J (2005) Diplomatic protection and human rights: the draft articles of the International Law Commission. Australian Year Book of International Law 24:75 ff.Google Scholar
  9. Forcese C (2007) The obligation to protect: the legal context for diplomatic protection of Canadians abroad. University of New Brunswick Law Journal 57:101 ff.Google Scholar
  10. Gaudemet Y (2001) Traité de droit administratif. Tome 1, Droit administratif general, 16th edn. Montchrestien, ParisGoogle Scholar
  11. Geyer F (2007) The external dimension of EU citizenship. Arguing for effective protection of citizens abroad. Ceps Policy Brief, n. 136, July 2007, Electronic copy available at:
  12. Guicciardi E (1937) L’atto politico. Archivio di diritto pubblico 1937: 265 ff. and 486 ff.Google Scholar
  13. Kunzli A (2006a) Exercising diplomatic protection: the fine line between litigation, demarches and consular assistance. ZaoRV 66:321 ff.Google Scholar
  14. Kunzli A (2006b) Restricting discretion: judicial review of diplomatic protection. Nordic J Int Law 75:280 ff.Google Scholar
  15. Lord Justice Richards (2006) The International Dimension of Judicial Review, The 2006 Gray’s Inn Reading at Barnard’s Inn (Gresham College). Available at the site: http/
  16. MacLean R (1999a) The European community’s trade barrier regulation takes shape, is it living up to expectations? J World Trade 33:69 ff.Google Scholar
  17. MacLean R (1999b) Success for private complainants under the EU’s trade barriers regulation. J Int Econ Law 2:519 ff.Google Scholar
  18. McNelis N (1998) The European Union Trade barriers regulation: a more effective instrument. J Int Econ Law 1:149 ff.Google Scholar
  19. Mattarella BG (2005) Umberto Borsi e il diritto amministrativo internazionale. Rivista italiana di diritto pubblico comunitario 15:933 ff.Google Scholar
  20. Mavroidis PC, Zdouc W (1998) Legal means to protect private parties’ interests in the WTO – the case of the EC New Trade Barriers Regulation. J Int Econ Law 1:407 ff.Google Scholar
  21. Neumeyer K (1910, 1922, 1930, 1936) Internationales Verwaltungsrecht, Verlag für Recht und Gesellschaft. Munich, Zurich, vol 1, 1910, vol 2, 1922, vol 3 I, 1936, vol 3 II, 1930, vol 4, 1936Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.La Tuscia University of ViterboRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations