Crowd-Powered TV Viewing Rates: Measuring Relevancy between Tweets and TV Programs

  • Shoko Wakamiya
  • Ryong Lee
  • Kazutoshi Sumiya
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6637)

Abstract

Due to the advance of many social networking sites, social analytics by aggregating and analyzing crowds’ life logs are attracting a great deal of attention. In the meantime, there is an interesting trend that people watching TVs are also writing Twitter messages pertaining to their opinions. With the utilization of bigger and broader crowds over Twitter, surveying massive audiences’ lifestyles will be an important aspect of exploitation of crowd-sourced data. In this paper, for better TV viewing rates in the light of the evolving TV lifestyles beyond home environments, we propose a TV rating method by means of Twitter where we can easily find crowd voices relative to TV watching. In the experiment, we describe our exploratory survey to exploit a large amount of Twitter messages to populate TV programs and on-line video sites.

Keywords

TV Viewing Rates Micro-blogging Social Network 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F., Gummadi, K.P.: Measuring User Influence on Twitter: The Million Follower Fallacy. In: Proc. of the 4th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, ICWSM 2010 (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Diakopoulos, N.A., Shamma, D.A.: Characterizing debate performance via aggregated twitter sentiment. In: Proc. of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2010), pp. 1195–1198 (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    French, J.C., Powell, A.L., Schulman, E.: Applications of approximate word matching in information retrieval. In: Proc. of the 6th International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM 1997 (1997)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fujisaka, T., Lee, R., Sumiya, K.: Monitoring Geo-Social Activities through Micro-Blogging Sites. In: Proc. of the 1st International Workshop on Social Networks and Social Media Mining on the Web, SNSMW 2010 (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., Tseng, B.: Why we twitter: understanding micro-blogging usage and communities. In: Zhang, H., Spiliopoulou, M., Mobasher, B., Giles, C.L., McCallum, A., Nasraoui, O., Srivastava, J., Yen, J. (eds.) WebKDD 2007. LNCS, vol. 5439, pp. 56–65. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Krishnamurthy, B., Gill, P., Arlitt, M.: A few chirps about twitter. In: Proc. of the 1st Workshop on Online Social Networks (WOSN 2008), pp. 19–24 (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    O’Connor, B., Balasubramanyan, R., Routedge, B., Smith, N.: From Tweets to Polls: Linking Text Sentiment to Public Opinion Time Series. In: Proc. of the 4th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, ICWSM 2010 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sawai, R., Ariyasu, K., Fujisawa, H., Kanatsugu, Y.: TV Program Recommendation Method Using SNS Based on Collaborative Filtering, IPSJ SIG Technical Reports, Vol. 2010-DBS-151, No. 43 (2010) (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhao, D., Rosson, M.B.: How and why people Twitter: the role that micro-blogging plays in informal communication at work. In: Proc. of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP 2009), pp. 243–252 (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zobel, J., Moffat, A.: Inverted files for text search engines. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR 2006) 38(2), Article 6 (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shoko Wakamiya
    • 1
  • Ryong Lee
    • 2
  • Kazutoshi Sumiya
    • 2
  1. 1.Graduate School of Human Science and EnvironmentUniversity of HyogoJapan
  2. 2.School of Human Science and EnvironmentUniversity of HyogoJapan

Personalised recommendations