Situation in France: Ethical Reflection on Research in Nanoscience and Nanotechnology

Chapter

Abstract

By the end of the 1990s, the possible impacts of nanotechnologies on humans and the environment had already come under the spotlight. Owing to the tremendous promise of the development programmes for these technologies, it seemed important to reflect upon a responsible way of implementing them. Even in 1989, as part of the MIT course on Law, Technology and Public Policy, David Forrest spoke in particular on the subject of regulating nanotechnology development, and in February 1999 a seminar was organised in California to devise guidelines on how to control the new risks associated with these recent technological possibilities [1].

References

  1. 1.
    Foresight Institute: www.foresight.org/guidelines/2004oct.html. Foresight Institute’s Worskshop on Molecular Nanotechnology Research Policy Guidelines, Monterey workshop, 19–21 February 1999. Environmental Regulation of Nanotechnology, G.H. Reynolds, Environmental Law Reporter, 6-2001
  2. 2.
    Nanotechnology: Societal implications, maximizing benefit for humanity, December 2003, NSF, United StatesGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    The big down, from genomes to atoms, ETC Group, January 2003Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Benefits, risks, ethical and social aspects of nanotechnology, 4th Nanoforum Report, June 2004Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nanotechnology: Revolutionary opportunities & societal implications, 3rd Joint EC-NST Workshop on Nanotechnology, 31 January 2002, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vers une stratégie européenne en faveur des nanotechnologies, Communication de la Commission COM, 338 (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Fantechi, R. Tomellini (eds.): Proceedings of the EuroNanoForum 2003, DG Research, European Commission, www.euronanoforum2007.de/ENF2003/index.htm
  8. 8.
    Nanotechnologies: A preliminary risk analysis, 1–2 March 2004 Workshop, Health and Consumer Protection Directorate General of the European CommissionGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. Healey, H. Glimell (eds): European workshop on social and economic issues of nanotechnologies and nanosciences, 14–15 April 2004Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Converging technologies: Shaping the future of European societies, European Community, August 2004Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Converging technologies for improving human performance, NSF, United States (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. Baird, A. Nordmann, J. Schummer: Discovering the Nanoscale. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nanotechnologies/Maxiservitude, January 2003, Pièces et Main d’œuvre (PMO)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Manifeste pour la technologie au service de l’homme, INPG, Grenoble, 12 October 2000Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J.P. Dupuy: Pour une évaluation normative du programme nanotechnologique. Communication au Forum européen des comités d’éthique nationaux, Rome, December 2003 and in a special issue of Les Nanotechnologies, Réalités Industrielles, Annales des Mines, February 2004Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    J.P. Dupuy: Complexity and uncertainty: A prudential approach to nanotechnology. Contribution to the workshop Nanotechnology: A preliminary risk analysis, European Commission, March 2004Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nanotech Challenges, Vol. 10, no. 2 (2004), HYLE (International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry) and TECHNE (Research in Philosophy and Technology)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: Opportunities and uncertainties. The Royal Society, July 2004Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    The Social and Economic Challenges of Nanotechnology. ESRC, United Kingdom, July 2003Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nanosciences, nanotechnologies. Rapport de l’Académie des Sciences et de l’Académie des Technologies, April 2004Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nanosciences et progrès médical. Rapport de l’OPECST, J.L. Lorrain and D. Raoul, May 2004Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Questions éthiques posées par les nanosciences, les nanotechnologies et la santé, 1 February 2007, Avis no. 96, CCNEGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lettre des programmes interdisciplinaires de recherche du CNRS. Ultimatech, no. 2, August 1991Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    000 000 001 mètre sous la matière. Le Journal du CNRS no. 151–152, July–August 2002Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nanosciences et nanotechnologies: Une réflexion prospective, May 2005, Mission scientifique, technique et pédagogique, ministère délégué à la RechercheGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Les Nanosciences, collection Focus, CNRS, September 2005Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    La Déferlante nano. Le Journal du CNRS, no. 189, October 2005; Riding the nano wave. CNRS International Magazine no. 2, Spring 2006Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    NanoSci-ERA. NanoScience in the European Research Area, ERA-Net of the Research DG of the European Commission (2004)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
  30. 30.
  31. 31.
    Nanobiotechnologies: des avancées pour les sciences du vivant. Dossier de Biofutur 249, November 2004Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Le nanomonde, de la science aux applications. Clefs CEA, no. 52, summer 2005Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    L. Laurent, J.C. Petit: Nanosciences and its convergence with other technologies: New Golden Age or Apocalypse? HYLE 11, 45–76 (2005)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    L. Laurent, J.C. Petit: Les nanotechnologies doivent-elles nous faire peur? Editions Le Pommier Paris (2005)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    E. Klein: La science nous menace-t-elle? Editions Le Pommier, Paris (2003)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    E. Klein, A. Grinbaum, V. Bontems: Le débat sur les nanosciences: enjeux pour le CEA. DSM-LARSIM, CEA, June 2007Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Le nanomonde, CEA Jeunes no. 18 (2008)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Code de bonne conduite pour une recherche responsable en nanosciences et nanotechnologies, Recommandation de la Commission, 7 February 2008Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    J.P. Dupuy, F. Roure: Les nanotechnologies: éthique et prospective industrielle. CGM and CGTI (2004)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    F. Roure: New ethics for nanosciences and the future of information technology? Let the limits move. In: Nanosciences and the long-term future of information technology, European Science Foundation, 2006Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    ELSA studies of nanosciences and nanotechnology, MEMO to the COST NST Advisory Group, Roger Strand, 16 November 2001Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Enjeux éthiques des nanosciences et des nanotechnologies, avis du COMETS du CNRS, 12 October 2006 www.cnrs.fr/fr/organisme/ethique/comets/docs/ethique_nanos_061013.pdf
  43. 43.
    Les Nanomatériaux. Effets sur la santé de l’homme et sur l’environnement, AFSSET, July 2006Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Nanotechnologies, nanoparticules. Quels dangers, quels risques? Report by the CPP, May 2006Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Y. de Kerorguen: Le débat sur les nanotechnologies prend de l’ampleur. La Tribune, 20 October 2006Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    G. Toulouse: Ethique des sciences: une étape majeure? La Croix, 28 November 2006Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    S. Hasendahl: Faut-il avoir peur des nanosciences? Le Quotidien du Médecin, 15 January 2007Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Touche pas ma planète, Debates on nanotechnologies in January 2006 and December 2006 with Corinne Lepage on Direct 8Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Séminaire interministériel sur les risques liés aux nanomatériaux et nanotechnologies, Direction Générale de la santé, Paris, 19 October 2006Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Les nanotechnologies: risques potentiels, enjeux éthiques, compte rendu de l’audition publique, OPECST, 7 November 2006Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Nanotechnologies: le point sur les débats, des orientations pour demain, Cahier d’Acteurs, Cité des sciences et de l’industrie, March 2007Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    J.C. André: Réflexions autour de la nano-éthique et de la nano-normalisation, INRS, September 2005Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    J.C. André: Vers le développement d’une recherche durable ou vers une (ré)humanisation des sciences et des artefacts. Environnement, Risques & Santé 7, 47–54 (2008)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    P.B. Joly (ed.): Démocratie locale et maîtrise sociale des nanotechnologies, report for La métro de Grenoble, September 2005Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    N. Baya Laffite, P.B. Joly: Nanotechnology and society: Where do we stand in the ladder of citizen participation? CIPAST Newsletter, March 2008Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Democratic technologies? Final report of the Nanotechnology Engagement Group, Involve 2007, www.nanowerk.com/nanotechnology/reports/reportpdf/report105.pdf
  57. 57.
    How to best engage the general public in nanotechnology? OECD Conference, Delft, The Netherlands, 30 October 2008Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    D. Boy: Vers une démocratisation des choix scientifiques et techniques? Deux mille cinquante, PUF, 7, April 2008Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    D. Boy: Pourquoi avons-nous peur de la technologie? Sciences PO Les Presses, Paris (2007)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Thèses sur les nanotechnologies, a+, Académies suisses des Sciences (2008)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    The ethics and politics of nanotechnology, UNESCO (2006)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    G. Collins: Nanosciences et science-fiction. Pour la Science, no. 290, December 2001Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Technology assessment on converging technologies. Literature and vision assessment, Document for the workshop: Converging technologies in the 21st century: heaven, hell or down to earth? STOA, European Parliament, June 2006Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Comité d’éthique des sciences du CNRS (COMETS)ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations