Advertisement

The Autonomy of Memel

  • Markku SuksiEmail author
Chapter
  • 725 Downloads

Abstract

The Memel Territory that existed in Lithuania between 1924 and 1939 was originally created on the basis of a convention that included the autonomy statute for Memel. The intention was to allow this territory, which was part of Germany until the First World War, and its predominantly German-speaking population govern itself as an autonomous part of Lithuania. The relationship between the Memel Territory and the rest of Lithuania was troubled and experienced a significant complication when the governmental authorities of Memel in 1931 sought direct contacts with governmental authorities of Germany. As a consequence, the Lithuanian authorities carried out a series of counter-measures in the Memel Territory. The legality of the different measures was brought to the PCIJ for resolution. The elements of autonomy touched upon in the Memel case are used as a yardstick for analyzing the extent of autonomy of those current sub-state entities included in the study.

Keywords

Legal Order Veto Power Executive Power Legislative Power Autonomous Entity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Hannum H (1996) Autonomy, sovereignty, and self-determination – the accommodation of conflicting rights, Revisedth edn. University of Pennsylvania Press, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  2. Kalijarvi T (1936) The problem of Memel. Am J Int Law 30:204–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Kalijarvi T (1937) The Memel Statute – its origin, legal nature, and observation to the present day. Robert Hale, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Lapidoth R (1996) Autonomy – flexible solutions to ethnic conflicts. United States Institute of Peace Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  5. Nordquist K-Å (1998) Autonomy as a conflict-solving mechanism – an overview. In: Suksi M (ed) Autonomy: applications and implications. Kluwer Law International, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  6. Plieg E-A (1962) Das Memelland 1920–1939: Deutsche Autonomiebestrebungen im litauischen Gesamtstaat. Holzner-Verlag, WürzburgGoogle Scholar
  7. Robinson J (1934a) Kommentar der Konvention über das Memelgebiet, Band I. Verlag “Spaudos Fondas”, KaunasGoogle Scholar
  8. Robinson J (1934b) Kommentar der Konvention über das Memelgebiet, Band II. Verlag “Spaudos Fondas”, KaunasGoogle Scholar
  9. Rogge A (1928) Die Verfassung des Memelgebiets – Ein Kommentar zur Memelkonvention. Deutsche Rundschau G.m.b.H, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  10. von Freytagh-Loringhoven (1935) Das litauische Statutgerichts-Gezetz vom 13. März 1935. Zeitschrift für osteuropäische Recht 10:520–525Google Scholar
  11. Weiss N (2004) The protection of minorities in a federal state: the case of Germany. In: Tarr GA, Williams RF, Marko J (eds) Federalism, subnational constitutions, and minority rights. Praeger, WestportGoogle Scholar
  12. Wheare KC (1964) Federal government. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of LawAbo Akademi UniversityÅboFinland

Personalised recommendations