Advertisement

Grid Technologies for Satellite Data Processing and Management Within International Disaster Monitoring Projects

  • Nataliia Kussul
  • Andrii Shelestov
  • Sergii Skakun
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter describes the use of Grid technologies for satellite data processing and management within international disaster monitoring projects carried out by the Space Research Institute NASU-NSAU, Ukraine (SRI NASU-NSAU). This includes the integration of the Ukrainian and Russian satellite monitoring systems at the data level, and the development of the InterGrid infrastructure that integrates several regional and national Grid systems. A problem of Grid and Sensor Web integration is discussed with several solutions and case-studies given. This study also focuses on workflow automation and management in Grid environment, and provides an example of workflow automation for generating flood maps from images acquired by the Advanced Synthetic Aperture Radar (ASAR) instrument aboard the Envisat satellite.

Keywords

Synthetic Aperture Radar Synthetic Aperture Radar Image Certificate Authority Grid Service Global Forecast System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Shelestov, A., Kravchenko, O., Ilin, M.: Distributed visualization systems in remote sensing data processing GRID. Int. J. Inf. Tech. Knowl. 2(1), 76–82 (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allcock, W., Bresnahan, J., Kettimuthu, R., Link, M.: The Globus Striped GridFTP Framework and Server. In: Proceedings of ACM/IEEE SC 2005 Conf on Supercomputing. (2005). doi: 10.1109/SC.2005.72Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Butler, R., Engert, D., Foster, I., Kesselman, C., Tuecke, S., Volmer, J., Welch, V.: A national-scale authentication infrastructure. IEEE Comp. 33(12), 60–66 (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alfieri, R., Cecchini, R., Ciaschini, V., dell’Agnello, L., Frohner, Á., Gianoli, A., Lõrentey, K., Spataro, F.: VOMS, an authorization system for virtual organizations. Lect. Notes Comp. Sci. 2970, 33–40 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kussul, N., Shelestov, A., Skakun, S., Kravchenko, O.: Data assimilation technique for flood monitoring and prediction. Int. J. Inf. Theor. Appl. 15(1), 76–84 (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kussul, N., Shelestov, A., Skakun, S.: Grid system for flood extent extraction from satellite images. Earth Sci. Informatics 1(3–4), 105–117 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fusco, L., Cossu, R., Retscher, C.: Open grid services for Envisat and Earth observation applications. In: Plaza, A.J., Chang, C.-I. (eds.) High Performance Computing in Remote Sensing, pp 237–280, 1st edn. Taylor & Francis, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Feller, M., Foster, I., Martin, S.: GT4 GRAM: A functionality and performance Study. http://www.globus.org/alliance/publications/papers/TG07-GRAM-comparison-final.pdf(2007). Accessed 30 Aug 2010
  9. 9.
    Moe, K., Smith, S., Prescott, G., Sherwood, R.: Sensor web technologies for NASA Earth science. In: Proceedings of 2008 IEEE Aerospace Conference, pp. 1–7 (2008). doi:10.1109/AERO.2008.4526458Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mandl, D., Frye, S.W., Goldberg, M.D., Habib, S., Talabac, S.: Sensor webs: Where they are today and what are the future needs? In: Proceedings of Second IEEE Workshop on Dependability and Security in Sensor Networks and Systems (DSSNS 2006), pp. 65–70 (2006). doi: 10.1109/DSSNS.2006.16Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Foster, I.: The Grid: A new infrastructure for 21st century science. Phys. Today 55(2), 42–47 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shelestov, A., Kussul, N., Skakun, S: Grid technologies in monitoring systems based on satellite data. J. Automation Inf. Sci. 38(3), 69–80 (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chu, X., Kobialka, T., Durnota, B., Buyya, R.: Open sensor web architecture: Core services. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Intelligent Sensing and Information Processing (ICISIP), pp. 98–103. IEEE, New Jersey (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Botts, M., Percivall, G., Reed, C., Davidson, J.: OGC sensor web enablement: Overview and high level architecture (OGC 07–165) Accessible via http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifactid=25562(2007) Accessed 30 Aug 2010
  15. 15.
    Humphrey, M., Wasson, G., Jackson, K., Boverhof, J., Rodriguez, M., Bester, J., Gawor, J., Lang, S., Foster, I., Meder, S., Pickles, S., McKeown, M.: State and events for web services: A comparison of five WS-resource framework and WS-notification implementations. In: Proceedings of 4th IEEE International Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing (HPDC-14), Research Triangle Park, NC (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Foster, I.: Globus Toolkit Version 4: Software for Service-Oriented Systems. In: IFIP International Conference on Network and Parallel Computing, LNCS, vol. 3779, pp. 2–13. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Williams, D.N., et al.: Data management and analysis for the Earth System Grid. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 125, 012072 (2008). doi: 10.1088/1742–6596/125/1/012072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kussul, N., Shelestov, A., Skakun, S.: Grid and sensor web technologies for environmental monitoring. Earth Sci. Informatics 2(1–2), 37–51 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mandl, D.: Experimenting with sensor webs using Earth observing 1. IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nataliia Kussul
    • 1
  • Andrii Shelestov
    • 1
  • Sergii Skakun
    • 1
  1. 1.Space Research Institute NASU-NSAUKyivUkraine

Personalised recommendations