Advertisement

Tactical Planning in Flexible Production Networks in the Automotive Industry

  • Kai WittekEmail author
  • Thomas Volling
  • Thomas S. Spengler
  • Friedrich-Wilhelm Gundlach
Conference paper
Part of the Operations Research Proceedings book series (ORP)

Abstract

Today)s automotive markets are characterized by high demand volatility. As a consequence, flexibility to re-allocate production volume within the production networks is required, to match the production capacity for specific models with market demand. The sustained re-allocation of models to production lines to adjust to market demand is no longer a vision, but virtually industry standard. Hence, model plant allocation decisions are no longer a one time long term decision but a more frequent mid term planning task, for which current strategic decision support models are inadequate. Modified planning models are required to handle the increased flexibility. A modeling framework will be presented.

Keywords

Automotive Industry Mixed Integer Linear Programming Production Network Tactical Planning Supply Chain Planning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    G. Askar and J. Zimmermann. Optimal usage of flexibility instruments in automotive plants. In K.-H. Waldmann and U.M. Stocker, editors, Operations Research Proceedings 2006, pages 479–484, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007. Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Bihlmaier, A. Koberstein, and R. Obst. Modeling and optimizing of strategic and tactical production planning in the automotive industry under uncertainty. OR Spectrum, 31(2): 311– 336, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. Fleischmann, S. Ferber, and P. Henrich. Strategic planning of BMW)s global production network. Interfaces, 36(3): 194–208, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. Francas, M. Kremer, S. Minner, and M. Friese. Strategic process flexibility under lifecycle demand. International Journal of Production Economics, 121(2): 427–440, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    P.R. Gneiting. Supply Chain Design fuer modulare Fahrzeugarchitekturen. Eidgenoessisch Technische Hochschule, Zuerich, 2009.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    W. C. Jordan and S. C. Graves. Principles on the benefits of manufacturing process flexibility. Management Science, 41(4): 577–594, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Kauder and H. Meyr. Strategic network planning for an international automotive manufacturer: Balancing flexibility and economical efficiency. OR Spectrum, 31(3): 507–532, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. Meyr. Supply chain planning in the german automotive industry. OR Spectrum, 26(4): 447–470, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. K. Sethi and S. P. Sethi. Flexibility in manufacturing: a survey. The International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, 2(4): 289–328, 1990.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kai Wittek
    • 1
    Email author
  • Thomas Volling
    • 1
  • Thomas S. Spengler
    • 1
  • Friedrich-Wilhelm Gundlach
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Automotive Management and Industrial ProductionTechnische Universität BraunschweigBraunschweigGermany
  2. 2.Volkswagen AGWolfsburgGermany

Personalised recommendations