A Method for Robust Index Tracking

  • Denis KarlowEmail author
  • Peter Rossbach
Conference paper
Part of the Operations Research Proceedings book series (ORP)


In today’s Portfolio Management many strategies are based on the investment into indices. This is a consequence of various empirical studies that show that the allocation over asset classes, countries etc. provides a greater performance contribution than the selection of single assets. For every portfolio containing indices as components the problem is that an index cannot be purchased directly. So it has to be rebuilt. This is called index tracking. The goal is to approximate the risk and return profile of an index. There exist different approaches to track indices [6]. One widely used approach is sampling, where the index is reproduced by a so-called tracking portfolio with a smaller number of assets, mostly a subset of its components. When applying sampling one has to solve two sub problems: selecting the assets of the tracking portfolio and determining their fractions. The quality of tracking is measured by the tracking error, which expresses the deviation between the returns of the tracking portfolio and the returns of the index. The optimal tracking portfolio is the portfolio with the smallest tracking error among all possible tracking portfolios. This is usually calculated with past data, assuming that the tracking quality will remain in the future investment period. In the remainder of the paper, we show that the common approaches of sampling have weaknesses to generate tracking portfolios with a stable quality even in the estimation and investment period (section 2).


Tracking Error Support Vector Regression Mean Absolute Deviation Estimation Period Asset Class 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    G. Bamberg and N. Wagner. Equity index replication with standard and robust regression estimators. OR Spectrum, 22(4): 525–543, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J.E. Beasley. OR-Library: Distributing test problems by electronic mail. Journal of the Operational Research Society, pages 1069–1072, 1990.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Bi and K.P. Bennett. A geometric approach to support vector regression. Neurocomputing, 55(1–2): 79–108, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. Montfort, E. Visser, and L.F. van Draat. Index tracking by means of optimized sampling. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 34(2): 143–152, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Rudolf, H.J. Wolter, and H. Zimmermann. A linear model for tracking error minimization. Journal of Banking & Finance, 23(1): 85–103, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S.A. Schoenfeld. Active index investing. Wiley, 2004.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    X. Shao, V. Cherkassky, and W. Li. Measuring the VC-dimension using optimized experimental design. Neural computation, 12(8): 1969–1986, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. Vapnik, E. Levin, and Y.L. Cun. Measuring the VC-dimension of a learning machine. Neural Computation, 6(5): 851–876, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    V. N. Vapnik. Statistical learning theory. Wiley New York, 1998.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Frankfurt School of Finance & ManagementFrankfurt am MainGermany

Personalised recommendations