Advertisement

Automating the Variability Management, Customization and Deployment of Software Processes: A Model-Driven Approach

  • Fellipe Araújo Aleixo
  • Marília Aranha Freire
  • Wanderson Câmara dos Santos
  • Uirá Kulesza
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 73)

Abstract

This paper presents a model-driven and integrated approach to variability management, customization and execution of software processes. Our approach is founded on the principles and techniques of software product lines and model-driven engineering. Model-driven engineering provides support to the specification of software processes and their transformation to workflow specifications. Software product lines techniques allows the automatic variability management of process elements and fragments. Additionally, in our approach, workflow technologies enable the process execution in workflow engines. In order to evaluate the approach feasibility, we have implemented it using existing model-driven technologies. The software processes are specified using Eclipse Process Framework (EPF). The automatic variability management of software processes has been implemented as an extension of an existing product derivation tool. Finally, ATL and Acceleo transformation languages are adopted to transform EPF process to jPDL workflow language specifications in order to enable the deployment and execution of software processes in the JBoss BPM workflow engine.

Keywords

Software process Software product lines Model-driven development 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    EPF Project. Eclipse Process Framework Project (EPF) (2009), http://www.eclipse.org/epf/
  3. 3.
    Pohl, K., Bockle, G., Van der Linden, F.: Software Product Line Engineering: Foundations, Principles and Techniques. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kleppe, A.G., Warmer, J.B., Bast, W.: MDA Explained: The Model Driven Architecture: Pratice and Promisse. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    GenArch Plugin. A model-based Product Line Derivation Tool (2009), http://www.teccomm.les.inf.puc-rio.br/genarch/
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Rombach, D.: Integrated software process and product lines. In: Li, M., Boehm, B., Osterweil, L.J. (eds.) SPW 2005. LNCS, vol. 3840, pp. 83–90. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gear/BigLever Software, Software Product Lines – Pragmatic Innovation from BigLever Software. (2009), http://www.biglever.com
  9. 9.
    Pure:Variant (2009), http://www.pure-systems.com
  10. 10.
    Eclipse Foundation, Eclipse Process Framework (EPF) Composer 1.0 Architecture Overview (2010), http://www.eclipse.org/epf/composer_architecture/
  11. 11.
    Haumer, P.: Eclipse Process Framework Composer: Part 1: Key Concepts. (2007), http://www.eclipse.org/epf/general/EPFComposerOverviewPart1.pdf
  12. 12.
    Cirilo, E., Kulesza, U., Lucena, C.: A Product Derivation Tool Based on Model-Driven Tecniques an Annotations. Journal of Universal Computer Science 14 (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cirilo, E., Kulesza, U., Coelho, R., Lucena, C.J.P., von Staa, A.: Integrating Component and Product Lines. In: ICSR (2008b)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cirilo, E., Kulesza, U., Lucena, C.J.P.: Automatic Derivation of Spring-OSGi based Web Enterprise Applications. In: ICEIS 2009 (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
    Barreto, A.S., Murta, L.G.P., Rocha, A.R.: Componentizando Processos Legados de Software Visando a Reutilização de Processos (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Xu, R.-Z., Tao, H., Dong-Sheng, C., Yun-Jiao, X., Le-Qiu, Q.: Reuse-Oriented Process Component Representation and Retrieval. In: The Fifth International Conference on Computer and Information Technology. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Aleixo, F.A., Freire, M.A., Santos, W.C., Kulesza, U.: Software Process Lines (2010), http://softwareprocesslines.blogspot.com/
  19. 19.
    OMG. Software & Systems Process Engineering Metamodel Specification (SPEM) (2010), http://www.omg.org/spec/SPEM/2.0/
  20. 20.
    Eclipse Foundation, Eclipse (2009), http://www.eclipse.org/epf/
  21. 21.
    Clements, P.: Software Product Lines: Practices and Patterns. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2002)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Aleixo, F., Freire, M., Santos, W., Kulesza, U.: A Model-Driven Approach to Managing and Customizing Software Process Variabilities. In: Proceedings of XXIV Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering (SBES 2010), Salvador, Brazil, pp. 50–69 (2010)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hat, J.: JBPM (2009), http://labs.jboss.com/jbossjbpm/
  24. 24.
    Bendraou, R., Sadovykh, A., Gervais, M.-P., Blanc, X.: Software Process Mode and Execution: The UML4SPM to WS-BPEL Approach. In: 33rd EUROMICRO Conference SEAA (2007)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bendraou, R., Jezéquél, J.-M., Fleurey, F.: Combining Aspect and Mode Driven Engineering Approaches for Software Process Modeling and Execution. In: International Software Process Workshop, Vancouver, Canada, pp. 148–160 (2009)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Maciel, R.S.P., da Silva, B.C., Magalhães, A.P.F., Rosa, N.S.: An Integrated Approach for Model Driven Process Modeling and Enactment. In: XXIII Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fellipe Araújo Aleixo
    • 1
    • 2
  • Marília Aranha Freire
    • 1
    • 2
  • Wanderson Câmara dos Santos
    • 1
  • Uirá Kulesza
    • 1
  1. 1.Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)Rio Grande do NorteBrazil
  2. 2.Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Rio Grande do Norte (IFRN)Rio Grande do NorteBrazil

Personalised recommendations