Advertisement

An Advice System for Consumer’s Law Disputes

  • Nuno Costa
  • Davide Carneiro
  • Paulo Novais
  • Diovana Barbieri
  • Francisco Andrade
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 73)

Abstract

The development of electronic commerce in the last years results in a new type of trade which the traditional legal systems are not ready to deal with. Moreover, the number of consumer claims increased mainly due to the increase in B2C relations and many of these are not getting a satisfactory response. Having this in mind, together with the slowness of the judicial system and the cost/beneficial relation in legal procedures, there is the need for new suited and effective approaches. In this paper we use Information Technologies and Artificial Intelligence to point out to an alternative way of solving these conflicts online. The work described in this paper results in a consumer advice system aimed at fastening and making easier the conflict resolution process, both for consumers and for legal experts.

Keywords

Alternative dispute resolution Online dispute resolution Multi-agent systems 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Klamig, L., Van Veenen, J., Leenes, R.: I want the opposite of what you want: summary of a study on the reduction of fixed-pie perceptions in online negotiations. Expanding the horizons of ODR. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Online Dispute Resolution (ODR Workshop 2008), Firenze, Italy, pp. 84–94 (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goodman, J.W.: The pros and cons of online dispute resolution: an assessment of cyber-mediation websites. Duke Law and Technology Review (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    De Vries, B.R., Leenes, R., Zeleznikow, J.: Fundamentals of providing negotiation support online: the need for developing BATNAs. In: Proceedings of the Second International ODR Workshop, Tilburg, pp. 59–67. Wolf Legal Publishers (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chiti, G., Peruginelli, G.: Artificial intelligence in alternative dispute resolution. In: Proceedings of LEA, pp. 97–104 (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brazier, T., Jonker, M., Treur, J.: Principles of Compositional Multi-agent System Development. In: Proceedings of the 15th IFIP World Computer Congress, WCC 1998, Conference on Information Technology and Knowledge Systems, pp. 347–360 (1998)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Muecke, N., Stranieri, A., Miller, C.: The integration of online dispute resolution and decision support systems. In: Expanding the horizons of ODR, Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Online Dispute Resolution (ODR Workshop 2008), Firenze, Italy, pp. 62–72 (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Leake, D.B.: Case-Based Reasoning: Experiences, Lessons, and Future Directions. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (1996)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Almeida, T.: Lei de defesa do consumidor anotada, Instituto do consumidor. Lisboa (2001) (in portuguese)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Almeida, C.F.: Direito do Consumo. Almedina. Coimbra (2005) (in portuguese)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Notini, J.: Effective Alternatives Analysis in Mediation: “BATNA/WATNA” Analysis Demystified (2005), http://www.mediate.com/articles/notini1.cfm (last accessed on September 2010)
  11. 11.
    Andrade, F., Novais, P., Carneiro, D., Zeleznikow, J., Neves, J.: Using BATNAs and WATNAs in Online Dispute Resolution. In: Proceedings of the JURISIN 2009 - Third International Workshop on Juris-informatics, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 15–26 (2009) ISBN 4-915905-38-1Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jennings, N., Faratin, P., Lomuscio, A., Parsons, S., Wooldridge, M., Sierra, C.: Automated Negotiation: Prospects, Methods and Challenges. Group Decision and Negotiation 10(2), 199–215 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lewicki, R., Saunders, D., Minton, J.: Zone of Potential Agreement. In: Negotiation, 3rd edn. Irwin-McGraw Hill, Burr Ridge (1999)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bellifemine, F., Caire, G., Greenwood, D.: Developing Multi-Agent Systems with JADE. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., West Sussex (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Peruginelli, G., Chiti, G.: Artificial Intelligence in alternative dispute resolution. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on the Law of Electronic Agents – LEA (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nuno Costa
    • 1
  • Davide Carneiro
    • 1
  • Paulo Novais
    • 1
  • Diovana Barbieri
    • 2
  • Francisco Andrade
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of InformaticsUniversity of MinhoBragaPortugal
  2. 2.Faculty of LawSalamanca UniversitySalamancaSpain
  3. 3.Law SchoolUniversity of MinhoBragaPortugal

Personalised recommendations