The SID Creator: A Visual Approach for Integrating Sensors with the Sensor Web

  • Arne BröringEmail author
  • Felix Bache
  • Thomas Bartoschek
  • Corné P. J. M. van Elzakker
Part of the Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography book series (LNGC, volume 1)


This paper describes the Sensor Interface Descriptor (SID) model and focuses on presenting and evaluating the SID creator, a visual approach to create instances of the SID model. Those SID instances comprise the knowledge required to integrate a sensor with the Sensor Web. This integration is done by an SID interpreter which uses an SID instance to translate between a sensor protocol and the Sensor Web protocols. An SID instance, designed for a particular sensor type, can be reused in multiple applications and can be shared among user communities. The SID creator enables users to describe the interface, commands and metadata of their sensors. In a user study, we evaluated the simplification of the sensor integration process through the SID concept. The study incorporated four user groups, ranging from high school students to expert users, who were challenged to integrate weather station sensors with the Sensor Web by utilizing the SID creator. While the common approaches of integrating such sensors with the Sensor Web involve manual coding and extensive adaptation efforts, this new visual approach significantly simplifies the integration process.


Sensor Network High School Student User Study Sensor Type Open Geospatial Consortium 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    M. Botts, G. Percivall, C. Reed, and J. Davidson, “OGC Sensor Web Enablement: Overview and High Level Architecture,” Lecture Notes In Computer Science, vol. 4540, pp. 175–190, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Jirka, A. Broering, and C. Stasch, “Applying OGC Sensor Web Enablement to Risk Monitoring and Disaster Management,” in GSDI 11 World Conference, Rotterdam, Netherlands, June 2009.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. Stasch, A. C. Walkowski, and S. Jirka, “A Geosensor Network Architecture for Disaster Management based on Open Standards.” in Digital Earth Summit on Geoinformatics 2008: Tools for Climate Change Research., M. Ehlers, K. Behncke, F. W. Gerstengabe, F. Hillen, L. Koppers, L. Stroink, and J. Wächter, Eds., 2008, pp. 54–59.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. Walter and E. Nash, “Coupling Wireless Sensor Networks and the Sensor Observation Service - Bridging the Interoperability Gap,” in 12th AGILE International Conference on Geographic Information Science 2009, Hannover, Germany, 2009. 162 Arne Bröring, Felix Bache, Thomas Bartochek, Corné van de ElzakkerGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    K. Aberer, M. Hauswirth, and A. Salehi, “A Middleware for Fast and Flexible Sensor Network Deployment,” in 32nd International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, 2006.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Na and M. Priest, OGC Implementation Specification 06-009r6: OpenGIS Sensor Observation Service (SOS). Open Geospatial Consortium, 2007.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    I. Simonis, OGC Implementation Specification 07-014r3: OpenGIS Sensor Planning Service. Open Geospatial Consortium, 2007.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Cox, OGC Implementation Specification 07-022r1: Observations and Measurements - Part 1 - Observation schema. Open Geospatial Consortium, 2007.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Botts, OGC Implementation Specification 07-000: OpenGIS Sensor Model Language (SensorML). Open Geospatial Consortium, 2007.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. Hu, R. Robinson, and J. Indulska, “Sensor Standards: Overview and Experiences,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing ISSNIP’07, Melbourne, Australia, 3-6 December 2007.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    T. Bleier, B. Bozic, R. Bumerl-Lexa, A. Da Costa, S. Costes, I. Iosifescu, O. Martin, S. Frysinger, D. Havlik, D. Hilbring, P. Jacques, M. Klopfer, S. Kunz, P. Kutschera, M. Lidstone, S. Middleton, Z. Roberts, Z. Sabeur, J. Schabauer, S. Schlobinski, T. Shu, I. Simonis, B. Stevenot, T. Usländer, K. Watson, and K. Wittamore, SANY - An Open Service Architecture for Sensor Networks, M. Klopfer and I. Simonis, Eds. SANY Consortium, 2009.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. Gigan and I. Atkinson, “Sensor Abstraction Layer: A Unique Software Interface to Effectively Manage Sensor Networks,” in 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information, 2007. ISSNIP 2007, 3-6 2007, pp. 479–484.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. Tidwell, Designing Interfaces: Patterns for Effective Interaction Design. O’Reilly, 2006.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. Jirka and A. Broering, OGC Discussion Paper 09-033 - SensorML Profile for Discovery. Open Geospatial Consortium, 2009.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. Nielsen, Usability Engineering. Morgan Kaufmann, 1993.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. van Someren, Y. Barnard, and J. Sandberg, The Think Aloud Method - A Practical Guide to Modelling Cognitive Processes. London: Academic Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    C. van Elzakker, I. Delikostidis, and P. van Oosterom, “Field-Based Usability Evaluation Methodology for Mobile Geo-Applications,” The Cartographic Journal, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 139–149, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. Broering, S. Below, and T. Foerster, “Declarative Sensor Interface Descriptors for the Sensor Web,” in WebMGS 2010: 1st International Workshop on Pervasive Web Mapping, Geoprocessing and Services, Como, Italy, 26.-27. August 2010.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    A. Broering and S. Below, OGC Discussion Paper 10-134: Sensor Interface Descriptors. Open Geospatial Consortium, 2010.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arne Bröring
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Felix Bache
    • 2
    • 3
  • Thomas Bartoschek
    • 2
  • Corné P. J. M. van Elzakker
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty ITCUniversity of TwenteEnschedeNetherlands
  2. 2.Institute for GeoinformaticsUniversity of MuensterMuensterGermany
  3. 3.52°North Initiative for Geospatial Open Source SoftwareMuensterGermany

Personalised recommendations