Advertisement

A Comparative Analysis of Foreign Workers and Citizenship in Korea and Germany

  • Jong-Hee LeeEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Transcultural Research – Heidelberg Studies on Asia and Europe in a Global Context book series (TRANSCULT, volume 5)

Abstract

The number of foreign workers has increased in both Korea and Germany as part of globalization, and there has been a liberalization of the concept of citizenship. Korea and Germany have maintained the tradition of nation-states based upon ethnic and racial homogeneity. With respect to citizenship, these two countries are comparable and have cross-case validity in that both of them have accepted immigrant workers on short-term contracts. Both countries actively provide incentives to attract foreign professionals, while the “return home” policy towards unskilled workers is closer to exploitation. Korea gives priority to the employment of Koreans, and Germany does so to citizens of the European Union. In this respect they are similar, with each country importing a minimum number of foreign workers based on the principle of complementarity in the labor market. There are also several important differences between the two countries. This paper seeks to analyze migrant worker policy and institutions and the characteristics of foreign workers’ civic status in Korea and Germany.  Chapters 2 and  3 analyze the history and current status of foreign workers in Korea and Germany, respectively.  Chapter 4 conducts a comparative analysis of foreign workers and citizenship in Korea and Germany.  Chapter 5 draws lessons from the example of Germany that may benefit Korean immigration policy.

Keywords

Unemployment Rate Unskilled Worker Foreign Worker Immigrant Worker German Government 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Brubaker, R. 1992. Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Brubaker, R. 1994. “Rethinking Nationhood: Nation as institutionalized form, practical category, contingent event”. Contention 4 (1), 3–14.Google Scholar
  3. Bundesanstalt für Arbeit (ed.). 2002. Jahresbericht 2002: Die berufliche Situation von jugendlichen und erwachsenen Migranten in Deutschland. Nürnberg: Bundesanstalt für Arbeit.Google Scholar
  4. Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge (ed.). 2005. Migration, Asyl und Integration in Zahlen. Bonn: Das Druckhaus Bernd Brümmer.Google Scholar
  5. Bundesagentur für Arbeit (ed.). 2006. Arbeitsmarkt 2006. Amtliche Nachrichten der Bundesagentur für Arbeit 55 (1).Google Scholar
  6. Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge (ed.). 2008. Ausländerzahlen 2008. Nürnberg: Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge.Google Scholar
  7. Choe, H. 2006. “Hankuk sitichŭn shwip: 1987 nŏn ihu siminkwŏn chedo pyŏnhwa wa simin ŭisik” (South Korean citizenship: the institutional changes since 1987 and their effects on citizen’s consciousness). Min chuchu ŭi wa inkwŏn (Democracy and Human Rights) 4, 172–205.Google Scholar
  8. Hollifield, J. F. 1992. Immigration, Markets, and States: the political economy of postwar Europe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Jacobson, D. 1997. Right across Borders: Immigration and the Decline of Citizenship. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Joppke, C.H. 1998. Challenge to the Nation-State. Immigration in Western Europe and the United States. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Klusmeyer, D. 2001. “Introduction”. In Citizenship Today: global perspectives and practices, Eds. T. A. Aleinikoff and D. B. Klusmeyer. Washington D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
  12. Kymlicka, W., and W. Norman. 1995. “Return of the citizen: a survey of recent work on citizenship theory”. In Theorizing Citizenship, Ed. R. Beiner. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  13. Oltmer, J. 2005. Deutsche Migrationsgeschichte seit 1871. In Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung (Ed.), Migration und Integration in Deutschland. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung.Google Scholar
  14. Seol, D.-H. 2007. “Kukche nodongnyŏk idong kwa oekukin nodongcha ŭi siminkwŏn e daehan yŏn gu” (International labor migration and the citizenship of migrant workers: a comparison of German, Japan and Korea). Minchuchuŭi wa inkwŏn (Democracy and human rights) 7 (2), 369–419.Google Scholar
  15. Soysal, Y. N. 1994. Limits of Citizenship: Migrant and Postnational Membership in Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Statistisches Bundesamt (ed.). 2006. Datenreport. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.Google Scholar
  17. Yoo, K. S. and K.-Y. Lee, et al. 2004. Chesukryŏn oekuk inryŏ nodong chichang punsŏk (Analyses of unskilled foreign labour market). Seoul: KLI.Google Scholar
  18. http://www.immigration.go.kr (accessed 23 January 2010).

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Election Broadcasting Debate CommissionSeoulKorea
  2. 2.SeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations