Advertisement

Threats or Leverage for Korean Civil Society in Contesting Globalization

  • Hyun-Chin LimEmail author
  • Suk-Ki Kong
Chapter
Part of the Transcultural Research – Heidelberg Studies on Asia and Europe in a Global Context book series (TRANSCULT, volume 5)

Abstract

This chapter examines the ways in which newly emerging threats or opportunities on multiple levels impact on national social movements. By comparing strategy shifts between environmental and human rights movements in Korea since the collapse of the military dictatorship in 1987, we find that international factors such as intergovernmental organizations, neoliberalism, and the Internet have collaboratively impacted on local activism in Korea. Paradoxically, political threats at both national and international levels could offer opportunities for local groups to form alliances around, across, and even beyond national borders. In contrast to human rights groups, environmental groups that develop transnational ties and domestic institutional channels are more likely to change from an insider strategy to an outsider one, and vice versa.

Keywords

Social Movement Environmental Group Korean Government Strategy Shift Political Opportunity Structure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ayres, Jeffrey M. (1999). “From the Street to the Internet: The Cyber-diffusion of Contention”. Annals of the American Academy Political and Social Science, 556, 132–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ayres, Jeffrey M. (2004). “Framing Collective Action Against Neoliberalism: The Case of the ‘Anti-Globalization’ Movement”. Journal of World-System Research, 10(1), 11–34.Google Scholar
  3. Brysk, Alison. (1993). “From Above and Below: Social Movements, the International System, and Human Rights in Argentina”. Comparative Political Studies, 26(3), 259–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brysk, Alison. (1994). The Politics of Human Rights in Argentina - Protest, Changes, and Democratization. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bandy, Joe. & J. Smith. (2005). “Factors Affecting Conflict and Cooperation in Transnational Movement Networks”. In J. Bandy & J. Smith (eds.), Coalitions Across Borders: Transnational Protest and the Neoliberal Order (pp. 231–252). Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  6. Clark, Ann Marie, Elizabeth Friedman, and Kathryn Hochstetler. (1998). “The Sovereign Limits of Global Civil Society: A Comparison of NGO Participation in UN World Conferences on the Environment, Human Rights, and Women”. World Politics, 51, 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Evangelista, Matthew. (1995). “The Paradox of State Strength: Transnational Relations, Domestic Structures, and Security Policy in the Russia and the Soviet Union”. International Organization, 49(1), 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Juris, Jeffrey. (2008). Networking Futures: the Movements against Corporate Globalization. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Keck, Margaret & Kathryn Sikkink. (1998). Activists Beyond Borders–Advocacy Networks in International Politics, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  10. KFEM Kukjeyŏbdae wiwŏnhoe. (2001). Kukjeyŏbdae hwaldong bogosŏ (Report of International Collaboration), Seoul: KFEM.Google Scholar
  11. Kong, Suk-Ki. (2006). “Transnational Mobilization to Empower Local Activism: A Comparison of the Korean Human Rights and Environmental Movements”. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Sociology at Harvard University.Google Scholar
  12. Kong, Suk-Ki & Hyun-Chin Lim. (2010).Segye sahoe p’orŏm kwa Han’guk Sahoeundong (The World Social Forums and Korean Social Movements: From Seattle to Belém). The Korean Journal of International Relations, 50(1), 341–372. Google Scholar
  13. Koo, Hagen. (1993). State and society in Contemporary Korea, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar
  14. Lewis, Tammy L. (2000). “Transnational Conservation Movement Organizations: Shaping the Protected Area Systems of Less Developed Countries”. Mobilization: An International Journal, 5(1), 105–123.Google Scholar
  15. Moghadam, Valentine M. (2008). Globalization and Social Movements: Islamism, Feminism, and the Global Justice Movement, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. National Commission on Human Rights of Korea. (2003). Yŏnlebokosŏ (Annual Report), Seoul: NHRC.Google Scholar
  17. National Commission on Human Rights of Korea. (2004). Kukgaboanbŏp jŏkyongesŏ nat’anan ingwŏn silt’ae (Report of Investigation into the Actual Condition of Applying the National Security Law), Seoul: NHRC.Google Scholar
  18. Risse-Kappen, Thomas (ed.). (1995). Bringing Transnational Relations Back In- Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures, and International Institutions, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Risse, Thomas and Kathryn Sikkink. (1999). The socialization of international human rights norms into domestic practices, In Risse, Thomas, Stephen C. Ropp, and Kathryn Sikkink, (eds.), The Power of Human Rights: International. Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Risse, Thomas, Stephen C. Ropp, and Kathryn Sikkink (eds.), (1999). The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Rowell, Andrew. (1996). Green Backlash: Global Subversion of the Environmental Movement, New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Sarangbang Group for Human Rights. (2003). Ingwŏn harusosik (Human Rights Daily News: 1993–2003), Seoul: Sarangbang Group.Google Scholar
  23. Scholte, Jan Aart. (2003). Democratizing the Global Economy: The Role of Civil Society, Centre for the Study of Globalization and Regionalization at University of Warwick.Google Scholar
  24. Simin ŭi sinmun. (2003). Han‘guk mingandanche chongram (Directory of Korean NGOs), Seoul: The NGO Times.Google Scholar
  25. Simin ŭi sinmun. (2004). Han‘guk siminsahoe yŏngam (Korea Civil Society Yearbook), Seoul: The NGO Times.Google Scholar
  26. Simin ŭi sinmun. (2005). Han‘guk siminsahoe sipoyŏsa (Korean Civil Society and NGOs from 1987 to 2002), Seoul: The NGO Times.Google Scholar
  27. Smith, Jackie and Hank Johnston. (eds.) (2002). Globalization and Resistance, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  28. Smith, J., M. Karides, et al. (2007). Global Democracy and the World Social Forums. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  29. Spiro, Peter. (1998). Review Essay: “Non-state Actors and Global Politics”. The American Journal of International Law, 92n4), 808–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Waterman, Peter and Jai Sen. (2009). World Social Forum: Challenging Empires, 2nd rev. ed., Montreal: Black Rose Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Asia Center and Deapartment of SociologySeoul National UniversitySeoulKorea
  2. 2.SeoulKorea
  3. 3.Asia Center, Seoul National UniversitySeoulKorea
  4. 4.Dongan-gu Kyungki-doKorea

Personalised recommendations