Advertisement

Environmental Impact Assessment Model for Wireless Sensor Networks

  • Jérémy Bonvoisin
  • Alan Lelah
  • Fabrice Mathieux
  • Daniel Brissaud
Conference paper

Abstract

The aim of our research is to understand what design parameters are responsible for the environmental impacts of deployment and operation of wireless sensor networks (WSN), with the underlying aim to support their ecodesign. In this paper, we propose an environmental impact assessment model for WSN based on lifecycle assessment (LCA) and network energy analysis. It is based on a two-level approach, given that environmental impacts of WSN are generated by both the network elements and their synergetic effects. This model will help analyse the sensibility of the environmental impacts to parameter changes, and compare different solutions.

Keywords

Lifecycle Assessment (LCA) Machine-to-Machine (M2M) Energy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Tsoukas, H. (1997): The tyranny of light: The temptations andthe paradoxes of the information society, Futures, Vol. 29, No.9, pp. 827-843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mathúna, C.Ó. (2008): Energy scavenging for long-termdeployable wireless sensor networks, Talanta, Vol. 75, No. 3,pp. 613-623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nakamura, J. (2006): Analysis of the Potential Contribution ofICT Services to a Sustainable Society, in: Proceedings of the2006 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and theEnvironment, Scottsdale, AZ USA.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Akyildiz, I.F. (2002): Wireless sensor networks: a survey,Computer Networks, Vol. 38, No. 4: pp. 393-422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Watson, B.J. (2009): Creating a sustainable IT ecosystem:Enabling next-generation urban infrastructures, IEEEInternational Symposium on Sustainable Systems andTechnology, Tempe, AZ, USA.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Abukhader, S.M. (2008): Eco-efficiency in the era ofelectronic commerce - should `Eco-Effectiveness' approachbe adopted, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 16, No. 7, pp.801-808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    The Climate Group - Global e-Sustainability Initiative (2008):SMART 2020: Enabling the low carbon economy in theinformation age.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Erkman, S. (2004) : Vers une écologie industrielle, MayerCharles Leopold Eds.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Berkhout, F., Hertin, J. (2001): Impacts of information andcommunication technologies on environmental sustainability -speculations and evidence. Report to OECD, University ofSussex, SPRU - Science and Technology Policy Research.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yi, L., Thomas, H.R. (2007): A review of research on theenvironmental impact of e-business and ICT, EnvironmentInternational, Vol. 33, No. 6, pp. 841-849.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Loerincik, Y. (2006): Environmental impacts and benefits ofinformation and communication technology infrastructure andservices, using process and input-output life cycleassessment, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mulvihill, P.R., Milan, M.J. (2007): Subtle world: Beyondsustainability, beyond information, Futures, Vol. 39, No. 6, pp.657-668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Williams, E. (2002): The 1.7 kilogram microchip: Energy andmaterial use in the production of semiconductor devices,Environmental science & technology, Vol. 36, No. 24, pp.5504-5510.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Köhler, A., Erdmann, L. (2004) Expected EnvironmentalImpacts of Pervasive Computing, Human & Ecological RiskAssessment, Vol. 10, No. 5, pp. 831-852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Beucker, S., Clausen, J., Schischke K. (2008): WirelessSensor Networks for Agriculture and Automation: Challengesand Chances for Sustainability, Electronics Goes Green2008+, Fraunhofer IZM, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dubberley, M., Agogino, A.M., Horvath, A. (2004): Life-cycleassessment of an intelligent lighting system using adistributed wireless mote network, in: Conference record ofthe 2004 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics andthe Environment, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hoang, T. (2010): Environmental evaluation of machine-tomachineservices: the case of kerbside collection of glasswaste, CIRP IPS2 Conference, Linköping, Sweden.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bouzin, E. (2008) : Analyse de Cycle de Vie comparative:relève manuelle et télérelève de compteurs d'eau. CityPulseProject, Agro Paris Tech, Orange Labs.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Suri, A., Iyengar, S.S., Cho, E. (2006): Ecoinformatics usingwireless sensor networks: An overview, EcologicalInformatics, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 287-293.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rebitzer, G. (2004): Life cycle assessment: Part 1:Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, andapplications, Environment International, Vol. 30, No. 5, pp.701-720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lelah, A. (2010): SensCity: a new project opening the way forsustainable services in the city based on a mutualised M2Minfrastructure, CIRP IPS2 Conference, Linköping, Sweden.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jérémy Bonvoisin
    • 1
  • Alan Lelah
    • 1
  • Fabrice Mathieux
    • 1
  • Daniel Brissaud
    • 1
  1. 1.G-SCOP LaboratoryGrenoble UniversityGrenobleFrance

Personalised recommendations