Towards Sustainability-Driven Innovation through Product-Service Systems

  • Anthony W. Thompson
  • Tobias C. Larsson
  • Göran Broman
Conference paper
First Online:

Abstract

Many current sustainability considerations in industry constrain design space by emphasizing reduced material and energy flows across product life cycles. However, there are also opportunities for sustainability awareness to extend design space and drive innovation. Product-service systems (PSS) in particular can be a vehicle through which sustainability-driven innovation occurs. A framework for strategic sustainable development, including a backcasting approach, provides the basis for understanding sustainability in this work and provides insight into how incremental and radical approaches could be aligned within product innovation. This work explores how sustainability considerations can be better integrated into existing product innovation working environments, with an emphasis on opportunities that occur as sustainability knowledge leads to innovation through a product-service system approach. It is demonstrated and ideas are discussed around how sustainability can be used to drive innovation processes through product-service systems that companies rely upon, while also supporting global society’s movement toward sustainability.

Keywords

Sustainable Product Innovation Sustainable Product Development Strategic Sustainable Development Ecodesign Product Service Systems (PSS) 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Porter, M.E. and van der Linde, C., (1995): Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 9(4), pp 97. Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Johnston, P., Everard, M., Santillo, D., and Robert, K.H., (2007): Reclaiming the definition of sustainability, Enviro. Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 14(1), pp 60–66. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Millenium Ecosystem Assessment, (2005): Living beyond our means. Natural assets and human well-being. Statement from the board, J. Sarukhán and A. Whyte, Editors. Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Holmberg, J. and Robèrt, K.-H., (2000): Backcasting from non-overlapping sustainability principles--a framework for strategic planning, International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, Vol. (7), pp 291–308. Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Binswanger, M., (2001): Technological progress and sustainable development: what about the rebound effect?, Ecological Economics, Vol. 36(1), pp 119–132. Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Isaksson, O., Larsson, T.C., and Ronnback, A.O., (2009): Development of product-service systems: challenges and opportunities for the manufacturing firm, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 20(4), pp 329–348. Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Maxwell, D., Sheate, W., and van der Vorst, R., (2006): Functional and systems aspects of the sustainable product and service development approach for industry, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 14(17), pp 1466–1479. Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rittel, H. and Webber, M., (1973): Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning, Policy Sciences, Vol. 4, pp 155–169. Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yin, R.K., (2003): Applications of case study research, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks. Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blessing, L. and Chakrabarti, A., (2009): DRM, a Design Research Methodology, Springer. Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gordon, R.B., Bertram, M., and Gradel, T.E., (2006): Metal stocks and sustainability, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 103(5), pp 1209. Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Willard, B., (2002): The Sustainability Advantage: seven business case benefits of a triple bottom line, New Society Publishers. Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brundtland, G.H., ed. (1987): Our common future: [report of the] World Commission on Environment and Development, Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK. Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D., and Nelson, R., eds., (2006): The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford University Press: Oxford. Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Roozenburg, N.F.M. and Eekels, J., (1995): Product Design: Fundamentals and Methods, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, England. Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ulrich, K.T. and Eppinger, S.D., (2003): Product Design and Development, 3rd ed, McGraw-Hill/Irwin. Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kline, S. and Rosenberg, N., (1986): An Overview of Innovation, in The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth, R. Landau and N. Rosenberg, Editors. National Academy Press: Washington, DC. pp 275–306. Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tukker, A., (2004): Eight types of product-service system: eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet, Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 13(4), pp 246. Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tukker, A., Tischner, U., and Verkuijl, M., (2006): Productservices and Sustainability, in New business for old Europe: Product-Service development, competitiveness and sustainability., A. Tukker and U. Tischner, Editors. Greenleaf: Sheffield. pp 72–97. Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Karlsson, R. and Luttropp, C., (2006): EcoDesign: what's happening? An overview of the subject area of EcoDesign and of the papers in this special issue, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 14(15–16), pp 1291–1298. Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    McDonough, W. and Braungart, M., (2002): Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things, North Point Press, New York. Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Benyus, J.M., (1997): Biomimicry: Innovation inspired by nature, Harper Perennial, New York. Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Norris, G.A., (2001): Integrating life cycle cost analysis and LCA, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 6(2), pp 118–120. Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shapiro, K.G., (2001): Incorporating costs in LCA, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 6(2), pp 121–123. Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bey, N. and McAloone, T.C., (2006): From LCA to PSS - making leaps towards sustainability by applying product/service-system thinking in product development, Proceedings of LCE 2006, 13th CIRP International Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, Vol., pp 571–576. Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Byggeth, S.H., Ny, H., Wall, J., Broman, G., and Robèrt, K.- H., (2007): "Introductory Procedure for Sustainability-Driven Design Optimization", International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED). Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Thompson, A.W., Ny, H., Lindahl, P., Broman, G., and Severinsson, M. 2010: Benefits of a Product Service System Approach for Long-life Products: The Case of Light Tubes, in: Proceedings of the 2nd CIRP International Conference on Industrial Product-Service Systems (IPS2), pp. 83–89, Linköping University, Sweden. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anthony W. Thompson
    • 1
  • Tobias C. Larsson
    • 1
    • 2
  • Göran Broman
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.School of EngineeringBlekinge Institute of TechnologyKarlskronaSweden
  2. 2.Division of Functional Product DevelopmentLuleå University of TechnologyLuleåSweden

Personalised recommendations