Search Computing pp 256-271

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6585) | Cite as

Analysis of Business Models for Search Computing

  • Tommaso Buganza
  • Marta Corubolo
  • Emanuele Della Valle
  • Elena Pellizzoni

Abstract

The SeCo project is dedicated to the support of investigation-driven frontier research on search computing and its prime objective is not to develop a commercial venture. Still, not considering the possible market exploitation of such a project could be misleading also in terms of technology investigation. At the half of the project, when many technology and research decisions still must be taken, it is important to consider also the possible implications of such decisions on possible future business models. The present chapter is aimed at understanding the possible future trajectories for the exploitation options of the SeCo project. The chapter starts identifying roles and capabilities of a potential SeCo value chain. The second step is defining some archetypal Business Models investigating the option of having some of the previous roles not managed internally but delegated to the external market. Finally the business models are compared and recommendations for the following of the project are drawn.

Keywords

Search Computing software engineering development process advertising models cloud computing software architectures 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bhattacharya, S., Krishnan, V., Mahajan, V.: Managing New Product Definition in Highly Dynamic Environments. Management Science 44 (11 Part 2), S50–S64 (1998)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cusumano, M.A., Selby, R.: Microsoft Secrets. Free Press, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Iansiti, M., MacCormack, A.: Developing Products on Internet Time. Harvard Business Review 75, 108–117 (1997)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    MacCormack, A., Verganti, R., Iansiti, M.: Developing Products on Internet Time: The Anatomy of a Flexible Development Process. Management Science 47(1), 133–150 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mizk, N., Jacobson, R.: Trading Off Between Value Creation and Value Appropriation: The Financial Implications of Shifts in Strategic Emphasis. Journal of Marketing 67, 63–76 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Porter, M.E.: Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior. Performance. The Free Press, New York (1985)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Teece, D.J.: Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy. Research Policy 15, 285–305 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Teece, D.J., Pisano, G.: The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: an Introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change 3(3), 537–556 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A.: Dynamic Capabilities Management and Strategic. Strategic Management Journal 18(7), 509–533 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Verganti, R.: Planned Flexibility: Linking Anticipation and Reaction in Product Development Projects. J. Product Innovation Management 16(4), 363–376 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tommaso Buganza
    • 1
  • Marta Corubolo
    • 2
  • Emanuele Della Valle
    • 3
  • Elena Pellizzoni
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Ingegneria GestionalePolitecnicoMilanoItaly
  2. 2.Dip. di Ind. Design, Art, Communication and FashionPolitecnicoMilanoItaly
  3. 3.Dipartimento di Elettronica e InformazionePolitecnicoMilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations