Boolean Threshold Networks: Virtues and Limitations for Biological Modeling
Boolean threshold networks have recently been proposed as useful tools to model the dynamics of genetic regulatory networks, and have been successfully applied to describe the cell cycles of S. cerevisiae and S. pombe. Threshold networks assume that gene regulation processes are additive. This, however, contrasts with the mechanism proposed by S. Kauffman in which each of the logic functions must be carefully constructed to accurately take into account the combinatorial nature of gene regulation. While Kauffman Boolean networks have been extensively studied and proved to have the necessary properties required for modeling the fundamental characteristics of genetic regulatory networks, not much is known about the essential properties of threshold networks. Here we study the dynamical properties of these networks with different connectivities, activator-repressor proportions, activator-repressor strengths and different thresholds. Special attention is paid to the way in which the threshold value affects the dynamical regime in which the network operates and the structure of the attractor landscape. We find that only for a very restricted set of parameters, these networks show dynamical properties consistent with what is observed in biological systems. The virtues of these properties and the possible problems related with the restrictions are discussed and related to earlier work that uses these kind of models.
KeywordsBoolean Function Threshold Function Dynamical Regime Boolean Network Chaotic Regime
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Tyson, J.J., Chen, K.C., Novak, B.: Network dynamics and cell physiology. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 908–916 (2001)Google Scholar
- 5.Albert, R., Othmer, H.G.: ...but no kinetic details are needed. SIAM News 36(10) (December 2003)Google Scholar
- 6.Wang, R., Albert, R.: Discrete dynamic modeling of cellular signaling networks. In: Johnson, B.M.L., Brand, L. (eds.) Methods in Enzymology 476: Computer Methods, pp. 281–306. Academic Press, London (2009)Google Scholar
- 7.Albert, R., Toroczkai, Z., Toroczkai, Z.: Boolean modeling of genetic networks. In: Ben-Naim, E., Frauenfelder, H., Toroczkai, Z. (eds.) Complex Networks. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
- 8.Aldana-Gonzalez, M., Coppersmith, S., Kadanoff, L.P.: Boolean Dynamics with Random Couplings. In: Kaplan, E., Marsden, J.E., Sreenivasan, K.R. (eds.) Perspectives and Problems in Nonlinear Science. A celebratory volule in honor of Lawrence Sirovich. Springer Applied Mathematical Sciences Series, pp. 23–89 (2003)Google Scholar
- 10.Kauffman, S.A.: The Origins of Order: Self-organization and selection in evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1993)Google Scholar
- 19.Hertz, J., Krogh, A., Palmer, R.G.: Introduction to the Theory of Neural Computation. Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Science of Complexity. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1991)Google Scholar
- 25.Kürten, K.E.: Correspondance between neural threshold networks and Kauffman Boolean cellular automata. J. Phys. A 21, L615-L619 (1988)Google Scholar
- 26.Derrida, B.: Dynamical phase transition in nonsymmetric spin glasses. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 20, L721-L725 (1987)Google Scholar
- 35.Derrida, B., Weisbuch, G.: Evolution of overlaps between configurations in random Boolean networks. J. Phys. (Paris) 47, 1297–1303 (1986)Google Scholar
- 41.Gama-Castro1, S., Jiménez-Jacinto, V., Peralta-Gil, M., Santos-Zavaleta, A., Peñaloza-Spinola, M.I., Contreras-Moreira, B., Segura-Salazar, J., Muñiz-Rascado, L., Martínez-Flores, I., Salgado, H., Bonavides-Martínez, C., Abreu-Goodger, C., Rodríguez-Penagos, C., Miranda-Ríos, J., Morett, E., Merino, E., Huerta, A.M., Treviño-Quintanilla, L., Collado-Vides, J.: RegulonDB (version 6.0): gene regulation model of Escherichia coli K-12 beyond transcription, active (experimental) annotated promoters and Textpresso navigation. Nucleic Acids Research 36, D120-D124 (2008)Google Scholar