Advertisement

Modelling Elections in Post-Communist Regimes: Voter Perceptions, Political Leaders and Activists

  • Norman SchofieldEmail author
  • JeeSeon Jeon
  • Marina Muskhelishvili
  • Ugur Ozdemir
  • Margit Tavits
Chapter

Abstract

Recent work has argued that institutional characteristics of political systems, such as presidentialism vs. parliamentarianism, or majoritarianism vs. proportionality, will have significant effects on the stability of government and the nature of redistributive politics.

Keywords

Nash Equilibrium Presidential Election Electoral System Vote Share Vote Choice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This paper is based on work supported by NSF grant 0715929 and a Weidenbaum Center grant to Schofield. An earlier version on Polish elections was presented at the Conference on Democratic Institutions, Hoover Institution, Stanford University, 2009. A later version was completed while Schofield was the Glenn Campbell and Rita Ricardo-Campbell National Fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford, 2010. Muskhelishvili expresses her gratitude for a Fulbright Fellowship at Washington University in the 2009–2010 academic year. The authors thank Merab Pachulia, Director of GORBI, Tbilisi, Georgia for making the survey data for the 2008 election in Georgia available, and thank Rauf Garagozov, Leading Research Fellow, International Center for Social Research, Institute of Strategic Studies of the Caucasus, Baku, Azerbaijan. He and his colleagues, Tair Faradov and Rajab Sattarov, of the International Center for Social Research (ICSR) carried out the survey in Aizerbaijan. We thank Maria Gallego for help in preparing this survey.

References

  1. Anable D (2006) The role of Georgia’s media-and western aid-in the rose revolution. Harvard Int J Press/Polit 11:7–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bawn K, Rosenbluth F (2005) Short versus long coalitions: electoral accountability and the size of the public sector. Am J Polit Sci 50:251–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benoit K, Laver M (2006) Party policy in modern democracies. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Broers L (2005) After the ‘revolution’: civil society and the challenges of consolidating democracy in Georgia. Central Asian Surv 24:333–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Budge I, Robertson D, Hearl DJ (eds) (1987) Ideology, strategy, and party change: spatial analyses of post-war election programmes in 19 democracies. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Budge I, Klingemann H-D, Volkens A, Bara J, Tannenbaum E (eds) (2001) Mapping policy preferences-estimates for parties, electors, and governments 1945–1998. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Bunce V, Wolchik S (2010) The regional tradition. In: Bunce V, Wolchik S (eds) Democracy and authoritarianism in the post Communist world. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. Carothers T (2002) The end of the transition paradigm. J Democracy 13:5–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheterian V (2008) Georgia’s rose revolution: change or repetition? tension between state-building and modernization projects. Nationalities Papers 36:689–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Vries CE, Edwards EE (2009) Taking Europe to its extremes. Party Polit 15:5–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dow JK (2001) A comparative spatial analysis of majoritarian and proportional elections. Elect Stud 20:109–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dow JK (2011) Party-system extremism in majoritarian and proportional electoral systems. Br J Polit Sci 41:341–361Google Scholar
  13. Downs A (1957) An economic theory of democracy. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Duverger M (1954) Political parties: their organization and activity in the modern state. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Epstein D, Bates R, Goldstone J, Kristensen I, O’Halloran S (2006) Democratic transitions. Am J Polit Sci 50:551–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ezrow L (2010) Linking citizens and parties. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ezrow L (2011) Reply to Dow: party positions, votes and the mediating role of electoral systems. Br J Polit Sci 41:448–452Google Scholar
  18. Fidrmuk J (2000a) Economics of voting in post-communist countries. Elect Stud 19:199–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fidrmuk J (200b) Political support for reforms: economics of voting in transition countries. Eur Econ Rev 44:1491–1513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fjelde H (2010) Generals, dictators and kings. Conflict Manage Peace Res 27:195–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gandhi J, Vreeland J (2004) Political institutions and Civil War: unpacking anocracy. In: Working paper, Emory UniversityGoogle Scholar
  22. Grzymala-Busse A (2002) Redeeming the communist past. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huber J, Bingham Powell G Jr (1994) Congruence between citizens and policy makers in two visions of liberal democracy. World Polit 1:73–111Google Scholar
  24. Kitschelt H, Mansfeldova Z, Markowski R, Toka G (1999) Post-communist party systems. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  25. Laakso M, Taagepera R (1979) Effective number of parties: a measure with applications to west Europe. Comp Polit Sci 12:3–27Google Scholar
  26. Laver M, Schofield N (1990) Multiparty government: the politics of coalition in Europe. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Reprinted 1998. University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  27. Markowski R (2006) Polish elections of 2005: pure chaos or restructuring of the party system. West Eur Polit 29:814–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Markowski R, Tucker J (2010a) Euroskepticism and the emergence of political parties in Poland. Party Polit 1–26Google Scholar
  29. Markowski R, Tucker J (2010b) Subjective vs. objective proximity in Poland: new directions for the empirical study of political representation. In: Working paper, New York UniversityGoogle Scholar
  30. Mitchell L (2008) Democracy bound. Natl Interest 95:70–76Google Scholar
  31. Muskhelishvili M (2010) Georgia in a new wave of transformation: the Caucasus & globalization. J Polit Econ Stud 4:35–41Google Scholar
  32. Muskhelishvili M et al (2009) Georgia’s ongoing struggle for a better future continued: democracy promotion through civil society development. Democratization 16:682–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Owen A, Tucker JA (2010) Past is still present: micro-level comparisons of conventional vs transitional economic voting in three polish elections. Elect Stud 29:25–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Persson T, Tabellini G (2000) Political economics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  35. Persson T, Tabellini G (2003) The economic effect of constitutions. MIT Press, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  36. Powers DV, Cox JH (1997) Echoes from the past: the relationship between satisfaction with economic reforms and voting behavior in Poland. Am Polit Sci Rev 91:617–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Regan PM, Bell SR (2010) Changing lanes or stuck in the middle: why are anocracies more prone to civil wars? Polit Res Quart 63:747–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Riker WH (1953) Democracy in the United States. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Riker WH (1962) The theory of political coalitions. Yale University Press, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
  40. Riker WH (1980) Implications from the disequilibrium of majority rule for the study of institutions. Am Polit Sci Rev 74:432–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Riker WH, Ordeshook PC (1973) An introduction to positive political theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  42. Schofield N (1999) The heart and the uncovered set. J Econ Suppl 8:79–113Google Scholar
  43. Schofield N (2007) The mean voter theorem: necessary and sufficient conditions for convergent equilibrium. Rev Econ Stud 74:965–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schofield N, Zakharov AV (2010) A stochastic model of the 2007 Russian Duma election. Public Choice 142:177–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schofield N, Ozdemir U, Tavits M (2010) Elections in Poland. In: Working paper, Washington University in Saint LouisGoogle Scholar
  46. Schofield N, Claassen C, Gallego M, Ozdemir U (2011a) Empirical and formal models of the United States presidential elections in 2000 and 2004. Chapter 9 in this volumeGoogle Scholar
  47. Schofield N, Claassen C, Ozdemir U, Zakharov AV (2011b) Estimating the effects of activists in two-party and multi-party systems: comparing the United States and Israel. Soc Choice Welf 36:483–518Google Scholar
  48. Schofield N, Gallego M, Jeon J (2011c) “Leadership” in the elections in Great Britain 2005 and 2010. Electoral Studies 31:in pressGoogle Scholar
  49. Schofield N, Gallego M, Jeon J, Ozdemir U (2011d) Modelling elections in Canada. In: Working papers, Washington University in Saint LouisGoogle Scholar
  50. Schofield N, Gallego M, Ozdemir U, Zakharov AV (2011e) Competition for popular support: a valence model of elections in Turkey. Soc Choice Welf 36:451–482Google Scholar
  51. Stokes D (1963) Spatial models and party competition. Am Polit Sci Rev 57:368–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stokes D (1992) Valence politics. In: Kavanagh D (ed) Electoral politics. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  53. Sumbadze N (2009) Saakashvili in the public eye: what public opinion polls tell us. Central Asian Surv 28:185–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Szczerbiak A (1998) Electoral politics in Poland: the parliamentary elections of 1997. J Communist Stud Trans Polit 14:58–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tavits M, Letki N (2009) When left is right: party ideology and policy in post-communist Europe. Am Polit Sci Rev 103:555–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tucker JA (2006) Regional economic voting: Russia, Poland, Hungary, Slovakia and the Czech Republic. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vreeland J (2008) The effect of political regime on Civil War. J Conflict Res 52:401–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wade L, Lavelle P, Groth AJ (1995) Searching for voting patterns in post-communist Poland’s Sejm elections. Communist Post-Communist Stud 28:411–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Welt C (2010) Georgia’s Rose Revolution. In: Bunce V, Wolchik S (eds) Democracy and authoritarianism in the post Communist world. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Norman Schofield
    • 1
    Email author
  • JeeSeon Jeon
    • 1
  • Marina Muskhelishvili
    • 2
  • Ugur Ozdemir
    • 1
  • Margit Tavits
    • 1
  1. 1.Center in Political EconomyWashington University in Saint LouisSt. LouisUSA
  2. 2.Center for Strategic StudiesTbilisiGeorgia

Personalised recommendations