Advertisement

Evolving Metaphors for Managing and Interacting with Digital Information

Chapter

Abstract

Digital information is ephemeral. It requires a dedicated infrastructure and a concerted user effort to ensure that it is persisted for further usage. As information technology and practices evolve, we observe shifts in the metaphors we use to manage and relate to the digital content. In this chapter we reflect on the developments that are transforming the Personal Computing (PC) Desktop environment. First, from the direct observations of users in the early days of Internet adoption, we consider the support they had for authoring, storing, and viewing digital content and the practices they adopted for organizing and sharing information. We underline the evolution of email from a communication channel to a rich authoring environment that stores and contextualizes documents created during user activities. With that we observe the increased rate at which knowledge workers are exposed to information through content streams and the speed at which they need to react and engage. These changes presented challenges to the segmented and application bound information storage on the PCs. They exposed the insufficient support for managing and organizing content from Web services. Second, we discuss the approach that de-emphasizes storage management and focuses on the support for user activities. In order to enable organization of the distributed digital content we generalize the notion of folders to collections that comprise references to digital objects in disparate storage locations and services. We also advocate semantically rich representations of collections that capture relationships among digital items and usage context. The file metaphor is expanded to a composition of digital information that transcends file boundaries and incorporates sub-document parts or alternative representations of resources in the collection. These notions are promising for transitioning to the cloud computing paradigm and ubiquitous access to resources through multi-device personal computing.

Keywords

File System Digital Content Email Message Desktop Application Logical Organization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Prototypes and research studies described in this Chapter are conducted by the Integrated Systems Group at the Microsoft Research Lab in Cambridge, UK in collaboration with Instrata Ltd., Cambridge, UK. Special acknowledgments go to Yvonne Sanderson and Gerard Oleksik from Instrata Ltd. for their work on the user studies. Eduarda Mendes Rodrigues conducted quantitative analyses and, together with Gabriella Kazai and Annika Hupfeld worked on the design of the TAGtivity features. We particularly recognize the work by Gavin Smyth who is solely responsible for the implementation and deployment of TAGtivity software. The prototype is publicly released as the Microsoft Research Project Colletta http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/cambridge/projects/ResearchDesktop/ProjectColletta.

References

  1. Bannon L, Cypher A, Greenspan S, Monty ML (1983) Evaluation and analysis of users’ activity organization. In: Proceedings of CHI 1983. ACM Press, New York, pp 54–57Google Scholar
  2. Bardram JE, Bunde-Pedersen J, Soegaard M (2006) Support for activity-based computing in a personal computing operating system. In: Proceedings of CHI 2006. ACM Press, New York, pp 211–220Google Scholar
  3. Bellotti V, Ducheneaut N, Howard M, Smith I (2003) Taking email to task: the design and evaluation of a task management centered email tool. In: Proceedings of CHI 2003. ACM Press, New York, pp 345–352Google Scholar
  4. Boardman R, Sasse MA (2004) “Stuff goes in the Computer but it doesn’t come out”: a cross-tool study of personal information management. In: Proceedings of CHI 2004. ACM Press, New York, pp 583–590Google Scholar
  5. Cutrell E, Robbins DC, Dumais S, Sarin R (2006) Fast, flexible filtering with phlat – personal search and organization made easy. In: Proceedings of CHI 2006. ACM Press, New York, pp 261–270Google Scholar
  6. Czerwinski M, Cutrell E, Horvitz E (2000) Instant messaging and interruptions: influence of task type on performance. In: Proceedings of OZCHI 2000. ACM Press, New York, pp 356–361Google Scholar
  7. Czerwinski M, Horvitz E, Wilhite S (2004) A diary study of task switching and interruptions. In: Proceedings of CHI 2004. ACM Press, New York, pp 175–182Google Scholar
  8. Dourish P, Edwards K, LaMarca A, Salisbury M (1999) Presto: an experimental architecture for fluid interactive document space. ACM Trans Comput-Hum Inter 6(2):133–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ducheneaut N, Bellotti V (2001) E-mail as habitat: an exploration of embedded personal information management. Interactions 8(5):30–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dumais S, Cutrell E, Cadiz J, Jancke G, Sarin R, Robbins D (2003) Stuff I’ve seen: a system for personal information retrieval and re-use. In: Proceedings of SIGIR 2003. ACM Press, New York, pp 72–79Google Scholar
  11. Fetterly D, Manasse M, Najork M, Wiener J (2003) A large-scale study of the evolution of web pages. WWW 2003, 669–678Google Scholar
  12. Gonzalez VM, Mark G (2004) Constant, constant multi-tasking craziness: managing multiple working spheres. In: Proceedings of CHI 2004. ACM Press, New York, pp 113–120Google Scholar
  13. Henderson DA, Card S (1986) Rooms: The use of multiple virtual workspaces to reduce space contention in a window-based graphical user interface. ACM Transactions on Graphics 5,3, 211–243Google Scholar
  14. Isaacs E, Walendowski A, Whittaker S, Schiano DJ, Kamm C (2002) The character, function, and styles of instant messaging in the workplace. In: Proceedings of CSCW’02. ACM Press, New York, pp 11–20Google Scholar
  15. Jones WP, Bruce H, Dumais S (2001) Keeping found things found on the web. In: Proceedings of CIKM 2001. ACM Press: New York, pp 119–126Google Scholar
  16. Jones R, Milic-Frayling N, Rodden K, Blackwell A (2007) Contextual method for the redesign of existing software products. Int J Hum Comp Interact 22(1–2)Google Scholar
  17. Kaptelinin V (2003) UMEA: translating interaction histories into project contexts. In: Proceedings of CHI 2003. ACM Press, New York, pp 353–360Google Scholar
  18. Kerne A, Koh E, Smith SM, Webb A, Dworaczyk B (2008) CombinFormation: mixed-initiative composition of image and text surrogates promotes information discovery. ACM Trans Inf Syst 27(1):1–45, Article 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mackay WE (1988) More than Just a communication system: diversity in the use of electronic mail. In: Proceedings of CSCW 1988. ACM Press, New York, pp 26–28Google Scholar
  20. Mark G, Gonzalez VM, Harris J (2005) No task left behind? Examining the nature of fragmented work. In: Proceedings of CHI 2005. ACM Press, New York, pp 321–330Google Scholar
  21. Mendes Rodrigues E, Milic-Frayling N, Fortuna B (2008) Social tagging behaviour in community-driven question answering. In: Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence, WI’08, IEEE 2008, Sydney, Australia, pp 112–119Google Scholar
  22. Milic-Frayling N, Sommerer R, Tucker R (2002) MS WebScout: web navigation aid and personal web history explorer. Poster paper 170, WWW 2002Google Scholar
  23. Milic-Frayling N, Jones R, Mendes Rodrigues E (2006) User study of interconnection among communication, authoring, and information management processes. Microsoft research technical report MSR-TR-2006-96Google Scholar
  24. Oleksik G, Wilson ML, Tashman C, Mendes Rodrigues E, Kazai G, Smyth G, Milic-Frayling N, Jones R (2009) Lightweight tagging expands information and activity management practices. In: Proceedings of CHI 2009, ACM Press, New York, U.S., pp 279–288Google Scholar
  25. Robertson G, van Dantzich M, Robbins D, Czerwinski M, Hinckley K, Risden K, Thiel D, Gorokhovsky V (2000) The task gallery: a 3-D window manager. In: Proceedings of CHI 2000. ACM Press, New York, pp 494–501Google Scholar
  26. Smith G, Baudisch P, Robertson GG, Czerwinski M, Meyers B, Robbins D, Andrews D (2003) GroupBar: the taskBar evolved. In Proc. of the 2003 Australasian Computer-Human Conference, OzCHI 2003, S. Viller and P. Wyethh (eds), CHISIG 2003, Available on web at http://www.ozchi.org/proceedings/2003/ozchi2003.pdf, Accessed date 15 Aug 2011, pp 34–43
  27. Teevan J, Dumais ST, Liebling DJ, Hughes R (2009) Changing the way people view changes on the Web. In: UIST 2009. ACM Press, New York, pp 237–246Google Scholar
  28. Voida S, Mynatt ED, Edwards WK (2008) Re-framing the desktop interface around the activities of knowledge work. In: Proceedings of UIST 2008. ACM Press, New York, pp 211–220Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Microsoft Research LtdCambridgeUK
  2. 2.Instrata LtdCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations