Advertisement

High-accuracy ultrasound target localization for hand-eye calibration between optical tracking systems and three-dimensional ultrasound

  • Ralf Bruder
  • Florian Griese
  • Floris Ernst
  • Achim Schweikard
Chapter
Part of the Informatik aktuell book series (INFORMAT)

Abstract

Real-time target localization in ultrasound is useful in many clinical and scientific areas. For example in radiation therapy tumors can be localized in real-time and irradiated with a high accuracy. To measure the position of an ultrasound target in a global coordinate system or to extend the tracking volume by moving the ultrasound transducer an optical marker is attached to it and observed by an optical tracking system. The necessary calibration matrices from marker to ultrasound volume are obtained using hand-eye calibration algorithms which take sets of corresponding observations of the optical marker and an ultrasound target as input. The quality of these calibration matrices is highly dependent on the measured observations. While the accuracy of optical tracking systems is very high, accurate tracking in ultrasound is difficult because of the low resolution of the ultrasound volume, artifacts and noise. Therefore accurate hand-eye calibration is difficult between ultrasound and optical tracking systems. We have tested different phantoms, matching- and sub-pixel strategies to provide highly accurate tracking results in 3D ultrasound volumes as basis for hand-eye calibration. Tests have shown that – using the described methods - calibration results with RMS errors of less than 1mm between observed and calibrated targets can be reached.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bruder R, Ernst F, Schlaefer A, et al. Real-time tracking of the pulmonary veins in 3D ultrasound of the beating heart. In: 51st Annual Meeting of the AAPM. vol. 36 of Med Phys; 2009. p. 2804.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Poon TC, Rohling RN. Comparison of calibration methods for spatial tracking of a 3-D ultrasound probe. Eur J Ultrasound. 2005;31(8):1095–108.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tsai RY, Lenzr RK. A new technique for fully autonomous and efficient 3D robotics hand/eye calibration. IEEE Trans Rob Autom. 1989;5(3):345–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rusinkiewicz S, Levoy M. Efficient variants of the ICP algorithm. In: Proc Int Conf 3D Digit Imaging Model; 2001. p. 145–52.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen C, Hung Y, Cheng J. RANSAC-based DARCES: a new approach to fast automatic registration of partially overlapping range images. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1999;21:1229–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ralf Bruder
    • 1
  • Florian Griese
    • 2
  • Floris Ernst
    • 1
  • Achim Schweikard
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Robotics and Cognitive SystemsUniversity LübeckLübeckGermany
  2. 2.Univerity LübeckLübeckGermany

Personalised recommendations