Advertisement

About Is and Ought in Research on Belief in a Just World: The Janus-Faced Just-World Motivation

  • Jürgen Maes
  • Christian Tarnai
  • Julia Schuster
Chapter

Abstract

The history of just-world research is almost 50 years old and still shows continuously increasing publication rates. In these 50 years, two clearly different phases can be distinguished. Up to the end of the 1980s, studies predominantly concentrated on the effects of just-world beliefs (BJW) on victims of injustice, misfortune or failure. These studies portrayed BJW as an anti-social trait which makes people prone to disdain their fellow people, to exclude minorities, to devalue innocent victims and to pursue them with blame and reproach. Since more than 15 years ago a distinctive change can be observed: From then on, studies have concentrated on the positive functions of BJW. These more recent studies present BJW as a personal resource which subserves people in manifold ways in everyday life: It allows individuals to invest time and energy in long-term goals and future-oriented activities, it facilitates the development of trust in other people and society, and it provides a conceptual framework which helps to find meaning in the events of life. These different findings involve rather different explicit and implicit valuations of the just-world phenomenon. While it seemed reasonable in the first phase to view BJW in a negative light, to advise against it and to restrain its detrimental effects, the phenomenon is judged much more positively in recent years, its benefits are highlighted, and its promotion is considered. The current paper attempts to combine the two perspectives again: The originally observed rather detrimental effects should not be forgotten when looking at the more recently found rather positively connoted effects. Both might be two sides of the same medal: It is just because BJW has so manifold positive functions and can be used as a personal resource that individuals are so reluctant to give it up only because of contradicting evidence in everyday life. We illustrate the connection of these two sides with data from three studies including the formerly used variables as well as the more recently considered variables.

Keywords

Test Anxiety Stimulus Person Innocent Victim Responsibility Attribution Positive Resource 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Albee, G. W. (1986). Toward a just society: Lessons from observations on the primary prevention of psychopathology. American Psychologist, 41, 891–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brandtstädter, J. (1977). Normkritik als Voraussetzung pädagogisch-psychologischer Praxis [Norm criticism as a basis for educational-psychological practice]. Trierer Psychologische Berichte, 4(1).Google Scholar
  3. Brandtstädter, J. (1980). Vom Sein zum Sollen in der Theorie des Moralischen Urteils. Wege, Schleichwege, Irrwege [From is to ought in the theory of the moral judgment. Routes, rat runs, meanders]. In L. H. Eckensberger & R. K. Silbereisen (Eds.), Entwicklung sozialer Kognitionen: Modelle, Theorien, Methoden, Anwendungen (pp. 133–145). Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
  4. Brandtstädter, J., & Montada, L. (1980). Normative Implikationen der Erziehungsstilforschung [Normative implications of research on edicational styles]. In K. A. Schneewind & T. Herrmann (Eds.), Erziehungsstilforschung. Theorien, Methoden und Anwendung der Sozialpsychologie elterlichen Erziehungsverhaltens (pp. 33–55). Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
  5. Connors, J., & Heaven, P. C. (1990). Belief in a just world and attitudes toward AIDS sufferers. Journal of Social Psychology, 130, 559–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dalbert, C. (1997). Coping with an unjust fate: The case of structural unemployment. Social Justice Research, 2, 175–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dalbert, C. (2001). The justice motive as a personal resource: Dealing with challenges and critical life events. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  8. Dalbert, C., & Katona-Sallay, H. (1996). The “belief in a just world” construct in Hungary. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27, 293–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dalbert, C., & Maes, J. (2002). Belief in a just word as a personal resource in school. In M. Ross & D. T. Miller (Eds.), The justice motive in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Furnham, A. (2003a). Belief in a just world: Research progress over the past decade. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 795–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Furnham, A. (2003b). Just world beliefs are good for you. Contemporary Psychology, 48, 179–181.Google Scholar
  12. Furnham, A., & Procter, E. (1989). Belief in a just world: Review and critique of the individual difference literature. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 365–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Glennon, F., & Joseph, S. (1993). Just world beliefs, self esteem, and attitudes towards homosexuals with AIDS. Psychological Reports, 72, 584–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hafer, C. L. (2000). Investment in long-term goals and commitment to just means drive the need to believe in a just world. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1059–1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hafer, C. L., & Bègue, L. (2005). Experimental research on just-world theory: Problems, development and future challenges. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 128–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harper, D. J., & Manasse, P. R. (1992). The just world and the third world: British explanations for poverty abroad. Journal of Social Psychology, 132, 783–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnson, C., & Dickinson, J. (1971). Class differences in derogation of an innocent victim. University of St. Xavier: Unpublished manuscript (quoted in: Lerner, Miller & Holmes, 1976).Google Scholar
  18. Jones, C., & Aronson, E. (1973). Attribution of fault to a rape victim as a function of respectability of the victim. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 415–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kaiser, A., Lüken, A., Maes, J., & Winkels, R. (1994). Schulzeitverkürzung – Auf der Suche nach dem bildungspolitischen Kompromiß [On shortening the school period – Searching for a compromise in educational politics]. Grundlagen der Weiterbildung. Zeitschrift für Weiterbildung und Bildungspolitik im In- und Ausland, 5, 219–223.Google Scholar
  20. Kleinke, C. L., & Meyer, C. (1990). Evaluation of rape victim by men and women with high and low belief in a just world. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14, 343–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Latta, R. M., Bernhardt, V. L., Hildebrand, P. K., & Kahn, A. S. (1974). Attraction to a Brandtstädter, J. (1977). Normkritik als Voraussetzung pädagogisch-psychologischer Praxis victim: Balance theory or “the just world”? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1, 107–109.Google Scholar
  22. Lerner, M. J. (1965). Evaluation of performance as a function of performer’s reward and attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 355–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lerner, M. J. (1974). Social psychology of justice and interpersonal attraction. In T. Huston (Ed.), Foundations of interpersonal attraction (pp. 331–351). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  24. Lerner, M. J. (1977). The justice motive in social behavior. Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms. Journal of Personality, 45, 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lerner, M. J. (1978). …but nobody liked the Indians. “Belief in a just world” versus a “Authoritarism” syndrome. Ethnicity, 5, 229–237.Google Scholar
  26. Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world. A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  27. Lerner, M. J., & Miller, D. T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1030–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lerner, M. J., Miller, D. T., & Holmes, J. G. (1976). Deserving and the emergence of forms of justice. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 133–162). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  29. Lerner, M. J., & Simmons, C. H. (1966). The observer’s reaction to the “innocent victim”: Compassion or rejection? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 203–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lincoln, A., & Levinger, G. (1972). Observers’ evaluation of the victim and the attacker in an aggression incident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22, 202–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. MacLean, M. J., & Chown, S. M. (1988). Just world beliefs and attitudes toward helping elderly people: A comparison of British and Canadian university students. International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 26, 249–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Maes, J. (1997). Nicht-kognitive Persönlichkeitsmerkmale [Non-cognitive personality traits]. In Ministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Weiterbildung Rheinland-Pfalz (Ed.), Entwicklung und Erprobung von Modellen der Begabtenförderung am Gymnasium mit Verkürzung der Schulzeit. Abschlußbericht [Schulversuche und Bildungsforschung, 80] (pp. 89–102). Mainz: Hase & Koehler.Google Scholar
  33. Maes, J. (1998). Eight stages in the development of research on the construct of belief in a just world? In L. Montada & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Responses to victimizations and belief in a just world (pp. 163–185). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Maes, J. (2007). Gerechtigkeitsempfinden und das Lernen in der Weiterbildung [The sense of justice and learning in further education]. In A. Kaiser, R. Kaiser, & K.-H. Hohmann (Eds.), Lernertypen – Lernumgebung – Lernerfolg. Erwachsene im Lernfeld (pp. 60–80). Bielefeld: Bertelsmann Verlag.Google Scholar
  35. Maes, J., & Kals, E. (2002). Justice beliefs in school: Distinguishing ultimate and immanent justice. Social Justice Research, 15, 227–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maes, J., & Montada, L. (1989). Verantwortlichkeit für “Schicksalsschläge”: Eine Pilotstudie [Responsibility for “strokes of fate”: A pilot study]. Psychologische Beiträge, 31, 107–124.Google Scholar
  37. Maes, J., & Tarnai, C. (2008). Implizite Wertungen in psychologischen Forschungsprogrammen: Das Doppelgesicht der Gerechte-Welt-Motivation [Implicit evaluations in psychological research programs: The two-faced character of just-world-motivation]. In E. Witte (Ed.), Sozialpsychologie und Werte (pp. 89–108). Lengerich: Pabst.Google Scholar
  38. McDonald, A. P. (1973). A time for introspection. Professional Psychology, 4, 35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McDonald, G. W. (1977). Innocent victim, deserved victim and martyr: Observers’ reactions. Psychological Reports, 41, 511–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Montada, L. (1991). Life stress, injustice, and the question “who is responsible?”. In H. Steensma & R. Vermunt (Eds.), Social justice in human relations (Vol. 2, pp. 9–30). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  41. Montada, L. (1992). Attribution of responsibility for losses and perceived injustice. In L. Montada, S.-H. Filipp, & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Life crises and the experience of loss in adulthood (pp. 133–161). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  42. Montada, L. (1998a). Belief in a just world: A hybrid of justice motive and self-interest? In L. Montada & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Responses to victimizations and belief in a just world (pp. 217–246). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Montada, L. (1998b). Justice: Just a rational choice? Social Justice Research, 12, 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Montada, L., & Schneider, A. (1989). Justice and emotional reactions to the disadvantaged. Social Justice Research, 3, 313–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Montada, L., & Schneider, A. (1991). Justice and prosocial commitments. In L. Montada & H.-W. Bierhoff (Eds.), Altruism in social systems (pp. 58–81). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  46. Murphy-Berman, V., & Berman, J. J. (1990). The effect of respondents’ just world beliefs and target person’s social worth and awareness-of-risk on perceptions of a person with AIDS. Social Justice Research, 4, 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Rubin, Z., & Peplau, L. A. (1973). Belief in a just world and reactions to another’s lot: A study of participants in the National Draft Lottery. Journal of Social Issues, 29(4), 73–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rubin, Z., & Peplau, L. A. (1975). Who believes in a just world? Journal of Social Issues, 31(3), 65–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ryan, W. (1971). Blaming the victim. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  51. Simons, C., & Piliavin, J. A. (1972). The effect of deception on reactions to a victim. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 56–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Solomon, R. C. (1989). The emotions of justice. Social Justice Research, 3, 345–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stein, G. M. (1973). Children’s reactions to innocent victims. Child Development, 29, 73–93.Google Scholar
  54. Stokols, D., & Schopler, J. (1973). Reactions to victims under conditions of situational detachment: The effects of responsibility, severity, and expected future interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tomaka, J., & Blascovich, J. (1994). Effects of justice beliefs on cognitive, psychological, and behavioral responses to potential stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 732–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wagstaff, G. F. (1982). Attitudes to rape: The just world “strikes again”? Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 35, 277–279.Google Scholar
  57. Wagstaff, G. F. (1983). Correlates of the just world in Britain. Journal of Social Psychology, 121, 145–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zuckerman, M., & Gerbasi, K. C. (1977). Belief in a just word and trust. Journal of Research in Personality, 11, 306–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jürgen Maes
    • 1
  • Christian Tarnai
    • 1
  • Julia Schuster
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EducationBundeswehr University MunichNeubibergGermany

Personalised recommendations