Advertisement

Sensitive Analysis of Intellectual Capital on Corporate Performance in Selected Industry Sectors in China

  • Xuerong WangEmail author
  • Li Liu
  • Cuihu Meng
Conference paper
Part of the Computational Risk Management book series (Comp. Risk Mgmt)

Abstract

Intellectual capital is increasingly being recognized as a driving force for the prosperity of economy and corporations. This paper applies the value-added intellectual coefficient (VAIC) model to investigate the link between components of intellectual capital and corporate performance in three industry sectors in China. We find that (1) the material capital employed efficiency has a positive effect on performance in both manufacturing and real estate sectors; (2) the human capital efficiency has a positive effect on performance in the manufacturing sector but not in the real estate or the IT sectors; (3) the structure capital efficiency has non-significant effect on performance in any of the three industry sectors.

Keywords

Capital employed efficiency Human capital Intellectual capital Sensitive analysis Structural capital Value-added intellectual coefficient (VAIC) 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper is supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (No.71071072)

References

  1. Aboody D, Barth ME, Kasznik RR (1999) Evaluations of fixed assets and future firm performance: evidence from the UK. J Acc Econ 26(1–3):149–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bontis N (1998) Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops measures and models. Manage Decis 36(2):63–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bontis N, Dragonetti NC, Jacobsen K, Roos G (1999) Knowledge toolbox: a review of the tools available to measure and manage intangible resources. Eur Manage J 17(4):391–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bontis N, Keow WCC, Richardson S (2000) Intellectual capital and business performance in Malaysian industries. J Intellect Cap 1(1):85–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bornemann M (1999) Potential of value systems according to the VAICTM method. Int J Technol Manage 18(5–7):463–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caddy I (2000) Intellectual capital: recognizing both assets and liabilities. J Intellect Cap 1(2):129–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chatzkel J (2004) Moving through the crossroads. J Intellect Cap 5(2):337–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cuganesan S (2005) Intellectual capital-in-action and value creation: a case study of knowledge transformations in an innovation project. J Intellect Cap 6(3):357–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Firer S, Williams SM (2003) Intellectual capital and traditional measures of corporate performance. J Intellect Cap 4(3):348–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. John CD (2009) Intellectual capital measurement: a critical approach. J Intellect Cap 10(2):190–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Joia LA (2000) Measuring intangible corporate assets-linking business strategy with intellectual capital. J Intellect Cap 1(1):68–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Juniad MS (2004) Managing and reporting intellectual capital performance analysis. J Am Acad Bus Camb 3:439–448Google Scholar
  13. Marr B, Chatzkel J (2004) Intellectual capital at the crossroads: managing, measuring, and reporting of IC. J Intellect Cap 5(2):224–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Meritum Project (2002) Guidelines for managing and reporting on intangibles (Intellectual Capital Report). European Commission, MadridGoogle Scholar
  15. Mouritsen J (2006) Problematising intellectual capital research: ostensive versus per formative IC. Acc Auditing Account J 19(6):820–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pulic A (2004) Intellectual capital–does it create or destroy value? Measuring Bus Excell 8(1):62–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pulic A (2000) VAICTM – an accounting tool for IC management. Int J Technol Manage 20(5–8):702–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shaikh JM (2004) Measuring and reporting of intellectual capital performance analysis. J Am Acad Bus 4(1–2):439–448Google Scholar
  19. Stewart TA (1997a) Intellectual capital: the new wealth of organizations. Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Stewart TA (1997b) Intellectual capital. The new wealth of organizations. Doubleday – Currency, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Strassmann PA (1999) The value of knowledge capital. Available online: http://www.strassmann.com
  22. Sveiby KE (1997a) The new organizational wealth: managing and measuring knowledge-based assets. Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  23. Sveiby KE (1997b) The new organizational wealth: managing and measuring knowledge-based assets. Berrett-Koehler, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  24. Sveiby KE (2007) Methods for measuring intangible assets. Available at: www.sveiby.com/portals/0/articles/IntangibleMethods.htm. Accessed 15 May 2007
  25. Tobin J, Brainard W (1968) Pitfalls in financial model building. Am Econ Rev 58:99–122Google Scholar
  26. Unerman J, Guthrie J, Striukova L (2007) UK reporting of intellectual capital. ICAEW, University of London, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Williams SM (2001) Corporate governance diversity and its impact on intellectual capital performance in an emerging economy. Working Paper, Haskayne School of Business, The University of Calgary, Canada.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of AccountingNanjing University of Finance and EconomicsNanjingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.School of Civil EngineeringThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations