Computational Modeling of Culture’s Consequences

  • Gert Jan Hofstede
  • Catholijn M. Jonker
  • Tim Verwaart
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6532)

Abstract

This paper presents an approach to formalize the influence of culture on the decision functions of agents in social simulations. The key components are (a) a definition of the domain of study in the form of a decision model, (b) knowledge acquisition based on a dimensional theory of culture, resulting in expert validated computational models of the influence of single dimensions, and (c) a technique for integrating the knowledge about individual dimensions. The approach is developed in a line of research that studies the influence of culture on trade processes. Trade is an excellent subject for this study of culture’s consequences because it is ubiquitous, relevant both socially and economically, and often increasingly cross-cultural in a globalized world.

Keywords

dimensions of culture computational model social simulation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Williamson, O.E.: The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead. Journal of Economic Literature 38, 595–613 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hofstede, G.: Culture’s Consequences, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gorobets, A., Nooteboom, B.: Agent Based modeling of Trust Between Firms in Markets. In: Advances in Artificial Economics. LNEMS, vol. 584, pp. 121–132. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Acuff, F.L.: How to negotiate anything with anyone anywhere around the world. Amacom, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Olofsson, G.: When in Rome or Rio or Riyadh: Cultural Q&A’s for successful business behavior around the world. Intercultural Press, Yarmouth Maine (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kumar, R.: Brahmanical Idealism, Anarchical Individualism, and the Dynamics of Indian Negotiation Behavior. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management 4(1), 39–58 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kersten, G.E., Köszegi, S.T., Vetschera, R.: The Effects of Culture in Anonymous Negotiations: Experiment in Four Countries. In: Procs. of the 35th HICSS, pp. 418–427 (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guo, R.: How culture influences foreign trade: evidence from the U.S. and China. Journal of Socio-Economics 33, 785–812 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kónya, I.: Modeling Cultural Barriers in International Trade. Review of International Economics 14(3), 494–507 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gilbert, N.: Agent-Based Models. Sage Publications, Los Angeles (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tykhonov, D., Jonker, C., Meijer, S., Verwaart, T.: Agent-Based Simulation of the Trust and Tracing Game for Supply Chains and Networks. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 11(3), 1 (2008), http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/11/3/1.html Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lévi-Strauss, C.: Tristes Tropiques (originally in French, 1955). Penguin Books, New York (1992)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Geertz, C.: The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books, New York (1973)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schwarz, S.H.: Culture Matters: National value cultures, Sources, and Consequences. In: Wyer, R.S., Chiu, C.Y., Hong, Y.Y. (eds.) Understanding Culture. Psychology Press, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Trompenaars, F., Hampden-Turner, C.: Riding the waves of culture: understanding cultural diversity in business, 2nd edn. Economist Books, London (1993)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smith, P.: Nations, Cultures, and Individuals: New Perspectives and Old Dilemmas. J. of Cross-cultural Psychology 35(1), 50–61 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Meijer, S., Hofstede, G.J., Beers, G., Omta, S.W.F.: Trust and Tracing game: learning about transactions and embeddedness in a trade network. Production Planning and Control 17, 569–583 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Meijer, S., Verwaart, T.: Feasibility of Multi-agent Simulation for the Trust and Tracing Game. In: Ali, M., Esposito, F. (eds.) IEA/AIE 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3533, pp. 14–154. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bosse, T., Jonker, C.M., Treur, J.: Experiments in Human Multi-Issue Negotiation: Analysis and Support. In: Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 672–679 (2004)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hofstede, G.J., Jonker, C.M., Verwaart, T.: A Multi-agent Model of Deceit and Trust in Intercultural Trade. In: Nguyen, N.T., Kowalczyk, R., Chen, S.-M. (eds.) ICCCI 2009. LNCS, vol. 5796, pp. 205–216. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Smith, P., Bond, M.H., Kagitçibasi, C.: Understanding Social Psychology across Cultures. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2006)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pedersen, P.B., Ivey, A.E.: Culture-Centered Counseling and Interviewing Skills: A Practical Guide. Greenwood Press, Westport (1993)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hofstede, G.J., Pedersen, P.B.: Synthetic Cultures: Intercultural Learning Through Simulation Gaming. Simulation & Gaming 30, 415–440 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hofstede, G.J., Pedersen, P.B., Hofstede, G.: Exploring Culture: Exercise, Stories and Synthetic Cultures. Intercultural Press, Yarmouth (2002)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hofstede, G.J., Jonker, C.M., Verwaart, T.: Modeling Power Distance in Trade. In: David, N., Sichman, J.S. (eds.) MABS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5269, pp. 1–16. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hofstede, G.J., Jonker, C.M., Verwaart, T.: Modeling Culture in Trade: Uncertainty Avoidance. In: 2008 Agent-Directed Simulation Symposium (ADSS 2008), Spring Simulation Multiconference 2008, pp. 143–150. SCS, San Diego (2008)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hofstede, G.J., Jonker, C.M., Verwaart, T.: Individualism and Collectivism in Trade Agents. In: Nguyen, N.T., Borzemski, L., Grzech, A., Ali, M. (eds.) IEA/AIE 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5027, pp. 492–501. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hofstede, G.J., Jonker, C.M., Meijer, S., Verwaart, T.: Modeling Trade and Trust across Cultures. In: Stølen, K., Winsborough, W.H., Martinelli, F., Massacci, F. (eds.) iTrust 2006. LNCS, vol. 3986, pp. 120–134. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hofstede, G.J., Jonker, C.M., Verwaart, T.: Long-term Orientation in Trade. In: Schredelseker, K., Hauser, F. (eds.) Complexity and Artificial Markets, pp. 107–118. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hofstede, G.J., Jonker, C.M., Verwaart, T.: Simulation of Effects of Culture on Trade Partner Selection. In: Hernández, C., et al. (eds.) Artificial Economics: The Generative Method in Economics, pp. 257–268. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hofstede, G.J., Jonker, C.M., Verwaart, T.: Cultural Differentiation of Negotiating Agents. Group Decis Negot (2010), doi: 10.1007/s10726-010-9190-xGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hofstede, G.J., Jonker, C.M., Verwaart, T.: The Influence of Culture on ABMP Negotiation Parameters. In: Ito, T., et al. (eds.) Innovations in Agent-based Complex Automated Negotiations. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gert Jan Hofstede
    • 1
    • 2
  • Catholijn M. Jonker
    • 2
  • Tim Verwaart
    • 3
  1. 1.Wageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Delft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands
  3. 3.LEI Wageningen URDen HaagThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations